So they're adding 128GB of RAM to the existing one
Posts by annodomini2
1186 publicly visible posts • joined 24 May 2010
UK splashes £45M on AI supercomputer to help crack fusion power
UK.gov's nuclear strategy is 'slow, inefficient, and costly'
British boffins build diamond battery capable of working for a millennium or five
DARPA suggests turning old C code automatically into Rust – using AI, of course
Safety Critical 2
Most Safety Critical systems don't use dynamic memory management.
The MISRA standard specifically forbids it, assuming it's being used.
I'm not saying C/C++ is perfect, far from it.
But to me it does scream "Use this, it's better!" Ignoring the convenient (for them), but convoluted back doors we've put in the code to access your system if we need to.
Resource burden of electric vehicles set to triple by 2050
Musk claims that venting liquid oxygen caused Starship explosion
Fuel and Oxidiser tend to slosh around when subject to loads (i.e. re-entry), there will be design loads on the tank structure for how much propellant can remain in the tanks without damaging the ship on atmospheric re-entry.
They would need to dump to prevent the ship becoming damaged and potentially breaking apart at this point.
You would dump with the engines running as the propellent would separate and move away from the vent port and also hover around the ship until re-entry.
Given on the first launch they had a number of engine failures, it's logical that they would add more propellant to give a greater chance of reaching the target trajectory in these cases.
Also given there was no payload the extra propellant mass will help to simulate one, otherwise the forces experienced during launch will be higher and not a representative test.
SpaceX's Starship on the roster for Texas takeoff
Re: Clearing stage zero is again the primary aim...
Historically with probes, with multi-billion dollar launch costs and programs, combined with no super-heavy launch capability (Saturn V was cancelled remember).
The mass budget available for the landing systems was limited, so there's a trade off between payload for science and payload for landing, given that most of the people designing these missions are scientists, so they want to maximise science. So some risk is there.
With Super-heavy lift of Starship and the intention for them to be manned will require a greater margin of safety in the landing systems to reduce the risk.
NASA, DARPA enlist Lockheed to build nuclear-powered spacecraft
Lockheed Martin demos 50kW anti-aircraft frickin' laser beam
Techies ask PM to 'prepare UK chip strategy as a matter of urgency'
Here's how to remotely take over a Ferrari...account, that is
NASA boss says US may lose latest space race with China
Re: America needs a new adversary ...
Started as a NASA project:
Japan lacks the expertise for renewed nuclear power after Fukushima
Re: "an intermediary power source until the wider adoption of renewables like wind and solar"
Thorium is no safer than Uranium.
There are reactor designs that are safer than the current stuff, but the fuel has little to do with it.
Also if we can reprocess the existing spent fuel we've enough to power the planet for hundreds if not thousands of years without the need to transition to Thorium.
America's nuclear fusion 'breakthrough' is super-hot ... yet far from practical
Bill Gates' nuclear power plant stalled by Russian fuel holdup
Fast reactors are breeders.
The problem with a true breeder is proliferation, as it requires removing enriched fuel from the reactor. The concepts use a fertile blanket of material that needs to be replaced periodically.
Fast reactors are intrinsically ISO breeders, which create more fuel from the production of higher actinides e.g. plutonium, which can be burned in the reactor.
This has the downside that the enrichment of the reactor is constantly changing and changes the reactivity, this is part of what makes them harder to control.
Like any engineering decision it's a compromise, harder to control, but doesn't need to be refuelled for 20yrs.
But taking from something like LFTR, where they reprocess and remove fission products from the reactor, automatically during operation, will help with regulating the chemistry of the core and help with control.
The real advantage of fast reactors is they can be run on "spent fuel" from thermal BWR and PWR reactors with minimal reprocessing.
The problem is they're making the same mistake AEA made in the 60's, liquid metal cooling, they're either volatile (sodium, lithium etc) or expensive e.g. Lead + Bismuth. Molten Salts offer a better compromise IMO, but are also not without their risks.
All this is un-proven is the real issue and the major blocker being research investment.
Fusion won't avert need for climate change 'sacrifice', says nuclear energy expert
Re: "US government has promised around $1 billion in investment in nuclear fusion over five years"
They are DARPA have a few running, being military they'd likely keep it top secret to give themselves a competitive advantage.
Planes, Tanks, smaller ships will relatively "infinite" range (if they can build them that small), would be a serious advantage.
Tesla Autopilot accounts for 70% of driver assist crashes, says US traffic safety body
Fusion boffins apply plasma know-how to building thrusters
Intelsat orbital comms satellite is back online after first robo-recovery mounting and tug job gets it back into position
Fly me to the M(O2)n: Euro scientists extract oxygen from 'lunar dust' by cooking it with molten salt electrolysis
Move over Ceres! There's a new, smaller dwarf planet in town called Hygiea
Diggerland comes to Mars as boffins battle to save InSight's mole
Re: Bubble cars
First water world exoplanet spotted – and thankfully no sign of Kevin Costner, rejoice!
Re: Thank you!
"the light year is probably a difficult unit for Joe Bloggs to relate to"
The Sun is travelling at approximately 828,000km/h
Speed of light (in a Vacuum) is 299 792 458 m/s or 299,792.458 km/s.
A light year is 9,464,615,782,836.48 km
Therefore the Sun takes roughly 1303 years to travel 1 light year.
Mysterious 'glitch' in neutron stars may be down to an itch under the body's surface
Meet the super-speedy white dwarf binary system that's going to grav-wave our world
Years late to the SMB1-killing party, Samba finally dumps the unsafe file-sharing protocol version by default
US kids apparently talking like Peppa Pig... How about US lawmakers watching Doctor Who?
RIP 2019-2019: The first plant to grow on the Moon? Yeah, it's dead already, Chinese admit
Steamer closets, flying cars, robot boxers, smart-mock-cock ban hypocrisy – yes, it's the worst of CES this year
Jeep hacking lawsuit shifts into gear for trial after US Supremes refuse to hit the brakes
Congrats from 123-Reg! You can now pay us an extra £6 or £12 a year for basically nothing
EU aren't kidding: Sky watchdog breathes life into mad air taxi ideas
@Peter2,
It's also not going to have a ~30 meter wing to distribute the weight. It's going to have all of the velocity concentrated upon a meter area like a wrecking ball.
Yes the CSA is smaller, but the mass is much lower ~500-1000kg vs 7000-12000kg for the DC3
Someone would have to do the maths obviously.
SpaceX touches down in California as Voyager 2 spies interstellar space
A web where the user has complete control of their data? Sounds Solid, Tim Berners-Lee
It's official – satellite spots water ice at the Moon's chilly poles
Canny Brits are nuking the phone bundle
Re: Shysters
It all switched with the regulation changes that allowed users to cancel their mobile contracts at any time.
As the phone was a "freebie" with the contract, you could buy for 1 month and keep the phone, this required the companies to split the contract into the call plan cost and a loan for the device you are purchasing.
When this shift happened, it also conveniently coincided with the prices going up.
Tax the tech giants and ISPs until the bits squeak – Corbyn
Treasury
"HMRC would label it hypothecated and, on the basis that they don't like hypothecated taxes, would just roll it into the general taxation pot and the intended beneficiaries would get little or nothing out of it."
Treasury would, not HMRC, they seriously don't like having their spending direction dictated to, elected representative or not.
Connected car data handover headache: There's no quick fix... and it's NOT just Land Rovers
Boffins build the smallest transistor, controlled by an atom
Re: More akin to a relay than a transistor
Was about to say the same thing, but for the majority of uses of transistors today (by count) most are used as switches anyway.
The major issue I see with it is the removal of the solid state functionality, just like relays, making the thing reliable over billions if not trillions of actions, in wide environmental conditions is the challenge.
I could only see this being developed if we had room temperature superconductors.
Any data on the switching speed (I respect it's a prototype)?
Rejoice! Thousands more kids flock to computing A-level
Brain brainiacs figure out what turns folks into El Reg journos, readers
The Solar System's oldest minerals reveal the Sun's violent past
Re: Irradiation in the early solar system
Red dwarfs emit more radiation because they are physically smaller, i.e. the core is closer to the surface.
It could be that the young Sun was physically smaller for the purposes of starting the reaction and it would take time for the reaction to grow and also heat the outer layers of gas so there could have been more radiation emitted.
Brit spending watchdog brands GP Primary Support Care a 'complete mess'
Microsoft: The Kremlin's hackers are already sniffing, probing around America's 2018 elections
Engineers, coders – it's down to you to prevent AI being weaponised
What if tech moguls brewed real ale?
You're burning £1.2bn for what? UK spending watchdog gives digital court plans a kicking
"The digital feudal system. They're just replacing local lords (who've been occasionally know to go Robin of Sherwood with corporations, who sometimes do charity, but also very 'charitable' to poor government servants."