Re: Why anyway ?
"Yes, and most of the recent terrorist atrocities in France have been committed by people who were on such a list"
And everywhere else in Europe!
25401 publicly visible posts • joined 21 May 2010
"New York is a hamlet in the East Lindsey district of Lincolnshire, "
According to the Wikipedia..."New York is a small village situated in Tyne and Wear in the North East of England and is part of the urban conurbation of North Tyneside."
Not far away is Washington, Philadelphia, Ontario, Albany etc. :-)
"For my kids too, I had to choose a nationality when registring their birth. I chose Dutch, for practical reasons, but when we got the paperwork back from the town hall, it listed both British and Dutch citizenship. I didn't complain."
Based on what you wrote "here" appears to be the Netherlands. So how does their system work that they granted your kids British citizenship? Real question, not nitpicking, as a friend of mine was born, to British parents, in Malaysia and they had to apply specifically for to the UK for UK citizenship on his behalf as a baby.
"This strikes me as another weakness of the human monitoring. *If* we take the video on trust, then the car was being driven with dipped headlights which made it difficult for the human driver to spot the pedestrian."
Someone posted dashcam footage, at night, of the place where the incident happened. It's very well lit. Even driving with no headlights, a human driver would have seen the lady and her bike in the road.
"There is no excuse for not detecting someone wheeling a bike. Far smaller targets should be detected and acted on."
And that's the bit that's really, really hard. Is it a paper bag? Is it a brick? Is it a plastic or glass bottle? Is it something that fell off the back of a lorry that might cause damage or and old newspaper just blowing in the wind?
"if Assange is willing to spend time in a British prison for skipping trial in exchange for no extradition to the US then that seems the adult solution."
While I agree with much/most of your post, contempt of court is viewed extremely seriously by the judiciary and Assange is in no position to negotiate anything.
"If we wanted him dead, he would be, embassy or not. Considering one of the Special Collection Services's jobs is to break into embassies and they're quite good at it,"
I don't care how good you think they are, or if they even exist. There's simply no way in hell the US, or even Trump personally, would order something like that in the heart of London At least not without asking Mr Potter for a loan of his "Cloak of Invisibility". Have you seen how many cameras there are?
Or do you think, for example, the Israeli Mossad would dare to attempt something similar in a foreign embassy in Washington DC and you'd be happy with that?
"He would probably only get a suspended sentence anyway"
Possibly, but jumping bail is contempt of court and when apprehended results in immediate imprisonment until a court can be arranged. This could be almost immediately, but might take time.
"According to the Sentencing Guidelines Council, jail sentences should only be used for skipping bail when there are serious aggravating factors."
Going on the run in such a public fashion whilst constantly thumbing your nose at the government may well be considered "serious aggravating factors"
"Lawsuits around Autopilot should be thrown out for the fact that to enable it you have to acknowledge the warnings, you get warned during use, and you are required to monitor the conditions during use. If you fail to follow these instructions then you should not have a leg to stand on in court."
Which, when you follow that reasoning to the logical conclusion, completely negates the need for the autopilot. If you have to pay that much attention and monitor it continuously, you might as well be driving yourself.
Not that I am NOT disagreeing with you. I'm just pointing out that all the legal disclaimers that come with this sort of "autopilot" are an effective admission that it's not safe to use.
"The carbon foot and level of earth rape is far too high in producing these totally unnecessarily fast and heavy vehicles"
That may well be true in the longer term, but you can't help but notice that the Tesla brand has brought electric cars to the notice of Joe Public more so than any of the other manufactures. It's also seemingly upped the game for the traditional manufactures who were, on the whole, pretty "meh!" over electric and hybrid for quite some time.
"In my opinion, the @USDOT should immediately impose a moratorium on all autonomous vehicles on public roads."
I agree There a plenty of non-public places that are very similar environments where permissions could be gained. Such as military bases, industrial estates, university campuses or, better yet, the large areas these autonomous car makers already mainly seem to operate from.
"Exactly. See here
There seems to be an erroneous belief centered on the Uber video that the accident happened in the dark, whereas the fact is it the road was well lit."
Thanks for that. It's a very well lit area and I can no reason for the "superior" sensing ability of this car to have not seen the victim in time to stop unless there was something very badly wrong with the sensors or the data processing. She was about 2/3rds of the way across the road when she was killed. It was obvious she was a "hazard" from the cars point of view. It almost seems as though, as someone mentioned elsewhere on these forums, that the cars systems can't anticipate a collision, merely react to an imminent one (and it doesn't even seem to have reacted in this case)
"Not saying all tyres go this way but it takes a fuckton of them to be shredded to a smallish size to cover a 2 mile course to a depth of 3 inches."
Likewise childrens play areas and even road surfaces (mixed with tarnac). I also recall a report from Australia using cut-up sections of tyres strapped together and reflectors added to make roadside marker posts which, on the whole, survive being driven over in accident almost entirely unscathed. and a longer roadside lifetime to boot.
"That's the problem with remoaners, they never leave their comfort zone to hear other opinions."
And then there's the Brexiteer heroes galloping to the rescue to save us from the nasty foreigners, whether we like it or not. Take the blinders of and try to see that many people, on both sides, have their own, differing reasons for how they voted. You need a narrower brush.
"Well I believe that we are the only country to develop orbital capability and then kill it off..."
I wonder what sort of funding, if any, Reaction Engines Ltd will get? I can see them upping sticks and moving, lock stock and barrel, to where the money is.
"Why on earth would we be due a refund? We are choosing to leave."
For the same reason we will paying £billions for "current and future obligations" to be allowed to leave. As the first many posts point out, having cake and eating it. I wonder how much any UK patents and software is worth it to the EU to keep, or, if refused access, how well it will work if any UK patented kit or software is withdrawn. The UK seems to have a had a significant hand in security side of it.
"and tell GUMMINT to just STAY OUT OF THE WAY as much as possible. [yeah here come the exploitation arguments, yotta yotta - *yawn*]
I think all the recent exposés of the likes of Cambridge Analytics, Facebook, Google and their ilk shows what capitalism gets up to when the law is failing to keep up and regulation is light.
"Something particularly hazardous like radioactive waste or toxic chemicals you might want to bury a little deeper and further from inhabited areas, just to protect against the unlikely possibility of a meteor landing on top of it and sending it flying..."
Or in case it reaches a critical mass and explodes with such force that it splits the moon in half, send the survivors on a magical interstellar tour such that they reach a new star system every week and manage to spend a few days at each.
While it doesn't have carrier deals, the company is still able to sell its hardware to consumers as unlocked units.
I'm shocked and surprised that no one has mentioned if Big Telecoms and Big Cellphone are not lobbying hard to make all phones illegal unless locked to carrier and unlocking them to become illegal. DRM/Piracy/Think of the Children, etc.
"Not to speak of getting the interrupts hooked in the right sequence!"
I'd forgotten about that! A bloody TSR written by someone arrogant enough to think theirs would be the only one loaded so didn't gracefully pass on activation key-presses properly to next in line. If you only had one like that, you could load it last. If you had two like that you were either stuffed or had to find some way to patch it.
"PornHub has the same rights and I really wouldn't be surprised if the gun guys get kicked off there too (for entirely different reasons"
Based on my limited knowledge of the USA, it does seem as though the areas with gun racks on the back window of the pick-up is also a very religious god-fearing area. They won't be happy that their family friendly gun videos are being hosted on the devils porn sites :-)
"Sex, Guns, and Violence: Sorry, the combination of these I see creating weird subconscious associations and possibly encouraging all kinds of nonsense ranging from domestic violence to snuff flicks. It's just too creepy."
That's exactly the association the "anti fun" crowd have been pushing for decades. Sex and violence is always associated when complaining about the failing younger generation, vandalism, deliquancy, video games etc etc etc. Of, and let's not forget the devils music, Rock'n'Roll that was going to destroy civilisation back in the 1950s. because it encouraged wild dancing and sex!
seemingly random application of their "rules".
Considering the sheer amount of YouTube content and the massive flood of uploads on a daily basis, I would suggest it's poor algorithms rather than "seeming random". We see it all the time with automated systems from parking tickets issued 3 seconds after the ticket expires to weird site blocks and take downs.
"Here's the logic. You are running queries against a data set of potentially 50 million users, what server do you need for that and how much disk space is required? Do we believe they could fit it in an office in London?"
I did a repair on a server grade desktop box a few years ago at a university. The user was running queries for research on a local copy of the entire NHS patient database, over 60 million records. No network connection due to data sensitivity. The HDD looked exactly the same physical dimensions as any other 3.5" HDD. Weird that it all managed to fit in there eh?