Re: Technology
"Not just kitchens. Haven't you ever been to a hotel with a guest-operated conveyer toaster at the breakfast bar ?"
Toaster? Oh! That must be why I got funny looks from the other guests when I put my undercooked bacon through it.
25376 publicly visible posts • joined 21 May 2010
E.g. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GAqIynamBMY
Holy crap! Those tiny little slices are more fat than meat! And you'd need a whole pack just to male one bacon buttie. And it's pre-cooked for you in a microwave! Sacrilege!!!
If I had a Facebook account I'd be starting up a campaign to collect and donate bacon care packages to send to those poor suffering souls in the US. And maybe a Kickstarter campaign to raise funds for re-education centres to teach those poor deluded souls what bacon is meant to be.
Come on El Reg! It's Christmas. Can we re-vitalise the SPB and arrange air drops of real bacon for our colonial cousins via a fleet a PARIS aircraft? We could name the project PIIIIIIIGS IN SPAAAAAACE!
"Audio Analytic has found a way to take an already deeply creepy and disturbing thing and make it even creepier and more disturbing."
I still live in hope of a Star Trek like future but fear we're more likely heading for The Space Merchants combined with The Marching Morons.
"Because they often worried that one wrong move would indeed break the machine."
Probably because in the early days of £10000+ PC computers bought on the capital budget, the non-IT managers were aware of the value and warned users to never do anything that might damage the shiny new capital investment. Remember, those were the days when eating or drinking near the PC was a severe offence and a £1000 was a LOT of money.
"One also assumes that it is a ball mouse - something unheard of nowadays. (The younger among us will be confused by this story)"
And now that you mention it, all the ball mice I ever used wouldn't work upside down. The ball would drop to the "top" and the friction of that contact would stop it working as a trackball. Probably poor contact with the internal wheels/rollers too,
"For comparison, the Earth is about 6E21 tonnes, which at a rate of 10kton/sec would be gone in 6E17 seconds, 1.67E14 hours, 19E9 years. Slow enough to not bother me."
Now do the same for the mass of the atmosphere, leaving the rocky bit out of it. Is it a bit more of a worry now? :-)
"Probably that same places that fire their teachers when they give a world geography lesson and mention the Niger River in West Africa... "
Were they pronouncing it wrong? If so, odd considering LA was originally mainly French speaking.
I've always thought it was pronounced Nee-JER, a soft J
"1> Make rocket go higher and cross 100km line
2>Change definition of 'space' to one we can reach
Which did they go for?"
They are going for the 80Km line which by some definitions is space. The 100Km line is usually used as the definition for the edge of the atmosphere. This was a test flight. Also, as noted above, even the ISS has to be nudged back into orbit regularly because even at 400Km, it's subject to a small amount of atmospheric drag.
"What achievement? Rockets capable of doing better than this have been in use since at least WW2. Multiple countries routinely launch rockets not just into orbit but to land on other planets, and even private enterprise has started hitting orbit as a matter of routine."
Apart from the Russians and Chinese, no one is offering rides to humans. Those that may do, are not talking about fee paying passengers for anything close to 1/4mill just yet. Yes, it's just a rich mans rollercoaster ride at this stage, but then so were the first cars.
It was a massive, dirty bit of code whose time was right, and we ran with it."
My emphasis. That is the real crux of the matter. As per the article, Wang came out with theirs at about the same time. Another example is the iPod. There were other small, portable MP3 players before the iPod, but with some twewaking, the right marketing, and "the right time", Apple made a killing. There are many examples throughout history, eg use of water and steam power in ancient Greece but since slaves were cheap, who needs complicated powered machinery?
"Ok, then, the first practical and accessible to the masses word processor.
Still, innovation is innovation, and I'll lift a glass up to her tonight. Hail!"
So, like Apple then. Take an existing concept and improve the user interface. Unlike Apple, her business model was to make it better and cheaper, not better and massively more expensive.
No matter, as you say, still a great innovator and worthy of respect.
"ReactOS can't happen soon enough"
It's been happening for years now, and I suspect will never happen in way as to be useful to average users. If if it ever did, the MS lawyers would be unleashed and kill it dead, even if just under the weight of unaffordable legal costs. It's one thing to build a "workalike" from scratch in a "clean" environment, it's quite another to not have the big boys come along and accuse you of copyright infringement on the API definitions and spend years in court battles.
"Once you start adding up all the possible monthly and annual subscriptions you might want to consider which ones are worth keeping."
We're already there with TV. Free broadcast TV, all you can eat. Then subscription cable with premium sports and films as extras. Same on satellite, but some channels exclusive to a platform. Then the likes of Netflix and Amazon. So many subscriptions to so many services, all of which may me carrying something you want, but maybe not enough to justify the expense (or allowed by your budget). Now even the studios are jumping on the bandwagon and starting their own streaming services.
I can understand why these service are taking off in the US, having seen some US commercial TV with ad breaks every 10 minutes, even ads across the bottom of the show taking a 1/4 of the screen for a minute or so after the ad break has finished.
MS are just following the crowd, ads in the OS and apps, and then making you pay for that.
"Eventually, MS will convience OEM's to start distributing PC's with a new 'subscription' version of Windows 10 - at a reduced cost to them no doubt - to try and get consumers used to the idea of paying for Windows monthly. MS will manage most things remotely, further dumbing down the OS, and removing yet more power user features"
Maybe the end game is to supply a "free" WinTerm with every subscription and they get to control everything, including what you are allowed to install on your "PC".
"They are already testing simplified ribbons, it could be all you get in low-end versions."
Most home users don't really need a full fledged office package and many of those who do use MS Office at home are likely using employer supplied or highly discounted educational versions. If the only option becomes a monthly subscription, those home users are going to need something of obvious value for their money if they are not to jump ship to Libre Office/Open Office.
"You want it more private? Make it more private."
According to Microsoft, they are "committed to privacy"
Of course, they don't exactly say what they are committed too with regard to privacy. Maybe they mean they are committed to entirely removing the users privacy?
then that system can grind to a halt without anything else caring.
---------------
It does make one wonder who responsible for checking the security monitoring system and why they never wondered about either the complete lack of reports, logs etc. or even why, if reports were being generated, nothing ever happened for 19 months.
An org the size of Equifax should expect to be under constant attack fron multiple sources.
Seeing that they owe EVERYTHING they have gained to what they do for people, it is disingenuous for them to complain they have a right to any profit for not doing something that is fundamental to their very existence.
---------------
I once went on a sales course. The instructor said each area owef the company £xxx and it was our job to collect it. I only lasted a week before I found a proper job.
Ending that stupidity would go a long way toward solving these problems, because then we'd be able to get real competition for broadband services.
----------
The greatest and most ardent propents of capitalism and the "free market" seems to be suffering badly from monopolies in most areas and over regulation in a few small pockets.
I wonder if the pockets of over regulation are a backlash against the commetcial monopolies?
It's interesting how free market advocates denigrate Europe as "socialist" (implying communist) and yet in general we don't suffer the same problems.
"And we are not that big - 5600 cable TV subscribers and 4200 internet subscribers."
And yet so-called economies of scale are usually touted by the big boys as reasons they can provide cheaper and better, but can't beacause they are servicing huge debt and executive bonuses.
It the same across all industries. Surely ecomomies of scale dictate Dominoes can sell be a better, cheaper pizza than my local independant but agaon, the reality is the local independant is better and cheaper.
"In all cases , he'll fight it in the courts as far as he can,"
That's why he jumped bail in the UK. He'd fought it through the courts, losing at every stage and was due a final appearance which he obviously was expecting to lose as well, so he ran away from the consequences of his actions.
"Shit my mistake, I of course do not know what I meant, and only you know"
You may well know what you mean. But if you can't communicate your meaning in a reliable and accepted manner, is it any wonder that no one else knows what you mean?
"Assange is a political prisoner, in the United Kingdom, end of "
He's not a prisoner, neither political nor otherwise, and never has been. At worst, he was under house arrest in a stately home until he skipped bail and self-imprisoned himself in the embassy.
"my reading of the situation is: Moreno would hand Assange over to the British who would extradite Assange to the US with the understanding Assange would not face the death penalty. "
The UK would not extradite him to the US anyway. Sweden has first call on him. If the UK were, for some obscure legal reason, able to skip the Swedes and accede to a US extradition order, it would require the US to guarantee to no death penalty under any circumstances. The US/UK extradition treaty may well be unbalanced in the US favour, but there is no way the UK would extradite to anywhere where the charges could result in the death penalty being applied.
To people outside the world of IT, using a well recognised email address is seen as good. Maybe not quite so much nowadays, but until fairly recently, only the big boys and geeks had domain addresses. I still see signed vans with @aol.co.uk on them too, although these days it tends to sole traders or very small businesses and they've been using that email address for many years. They may even have their own domain and website, but that email address is what everyone knows.
"After all one of the main objectives of the Bloodhound team was to fire up enthusiasm in hi-tech in a potential workforce currently destined for McJobs in the service sector."
The required £25m is probably less than if the Govt. had tried to do the school visits etc that the Bloodhound team already did. The project probably saved the Govt. more than they now need.
"I actually think that aspect is really disturbing. While the perpetrator was given a 3 year sentence, in practice in the UK it means that he'll be out again in in 18 months."
I always assumed that the 50% time served was not automatic, but apparently for fixed term sentences of under 4 years, it is. Unless he gets up to some fairly serious bad behaviour inside, then yes, he will serve a maximum of 18 months minus time spent inside on remand. That's really not very long considering the amount of disruption and damage caused and the large number of victims.
...what's it for? The article doesn't actually mention any examples of what this greater accuracy does to help us in any other area than "mine is better than yours". I'm sure there are very good reasons for doing this, but it's well out of my field so some hints in the article would have helped.
"The difference is that buses failed safe - the network connections failed, but the buses still ran."
There was a comms failure on our local metro system the other week. Complete shutdown of the system resulted despite the fact there far fewer vehicles involved, no other vehicles other than authorised ones with trained operators, very few junctions, but, no, to be safe, it all has to stop. Could you imagine the reaction of roads being closed because traffic lights failed?
Admittedly, there are stretched os single line operation and even sections where the light rail shares track with main line trains, so I suppose those sections might be more dangerous to operate without comms or signalling.
"But a look in their forums shows tons of people just screaming at them, who didn't even bother reading the news."
How were they supposed to read the news when their phone data connection was down? You don't honestly think they would have something old fashioned like a landline based connection or a radio or even a TV, do you? No, of course not. The world had just ended!
"We standardized our network pcs on Macintosh for three reasons: robustness (took 3-4 months in a hellish environment to kill them; PCs lasted weeks);"
You were lucky with that Apple warranty. That sort of environment would normally void any warranty or service contract unless specifically written in and at significant annual cost. I bet the Apple of today wouldn't accept it :-)
"he had a knotty problem with a word document he was writing. He showed me the screen that had a single line of large point text on it,"
Is that even possible on any word processor? A basic plain text editor, maybe, but as far as I can remember, every word processor I ever used going back to Electric Pencil on a TRS-80 in the late 70's would auto-wrap at the end of the line. Had he somehow managed to set the right margin to something insane?
"Communication skills are key in any walk of life, explaining things is a communications skill we should all practice."
I think he's referring to the fact that the support desk is used a low cost training budget. If the staff are not trained in the first place, then the support staff have to do the training over the phone, on the fly.
Having said that, I did spend 10 years training users across the "PC boundary", ie on CP/M and similar, then through the "IBM PC revolution" and had to become quite adept at analogies because most of the users were coming into IT usage completely "cold". They may have seen blinkenlights and spinning tape drives on TV, or maybe even used a typewriter, but computers? Nope, No experience, no prior knowledge to build on. Sometimes it was tough going, but much of it was dealing with the wonderment many of them experienced :-)