
No
Show us we can trust you with this power, then we will think about it... The Anti-Terrorism act was massively miss-used.
354 publicly visible posts • joined 20 May 2010
Fucking hell, we are all here though aren't we.
Personally my reasons are that I wanted to read some comments against Apple, the company. The company that claims to have invented rounded corners, the company who take a 30% slice of apps sales, the company who still have that fugly striped background on their phones that OS9 used. The company who claimed Google had stolen their business by moving into the phone market.
The company who go to court rather than release a significantly better product.
I'm sure you are very good at marketing and percentages but perhaps no so much at tech.
Let me explain something.
ICS has higher hardware requirements. Put simply, it is recommended that the device has 1GB or RAM rather than the 512MB required by Gingerbread and previous versions. This means ICS will never come to most devices out there. Therefore your article is pure marketing guff.
Gingerbread will be the legacy cut off, get used to it.
So what are the chances of this happening outside of London, 0%, why? Deregulation has allowed buses to be a profit making business, in London the buses are run by private companies but they are scrutinised over their costs and profits and they don't set the fares.
If you want cheaper and better out there, follow London. Buses aren't for making a profit.
That challenge was by Ken years ago, it was for cooling the station platforms rather than trains.
It was won and the system was trialled at Victoria, they pumped groundwater around heat exchangers and out into the sewers to remove heat (a very elegant system as they only needed to add heat exchangers to the existing pumping system), it wasn't expanded by BoJo, he's far more interested in covering everything in adverts for very little return.
Those car ads where the driver is free to speed along winding roads with wonderful views and not another car on the road.
I've always seen those ads as a home goal for the car companies, the landscape and views would be so much nicer without that twat blaring music and speeding through it... Perhaps that view is spreading.
This sounds like a scam, someone is asking for this to happen or they wouldn't be suggesting it.
TV broadcasting is not the best way to do this. The spectrum should be used for data, perhaps metropolitan wifi networks. Local radio with occasional livestream and youtube video would be far more cost effective and allow better production standards.
Can you get someone who knows something about the world of Android to review Android phones please? I've asked before...
Nothing about new built-in apps.
Nothing about the panoramic camera.
Nothing to say this isn't an evolution of the Galaxy S! It's based on the Nexus S, it's google's design, not Samsung.
Also the sound problem is expected, bugs are expected on Nexus phones, when you get a Nexus you get the latest Android features, not the best camera or reliability, but these bugs are also patched within days or weeks, not months.
El Reg, I used to respect you guys...
Who the fuck gives tablets as xmas gifts anyway. Are you one of these kick a granny to get the last xbox guys?
Anyway, simply put, The iPad has this exact same problem you are just blind to it. I just need to tick a box to use Grooveshark on Android, I'd need to jailbreak an iPad. The Kindle Fire is in the same position, to get Gmail you need Market, to get Market you need to cheat and flash an aftermarket OS.
OK international diplomacy aside...
I would say he is making it up. This is a trick of the security industry, a non-specific-threat.
Google has balls, they implicated China when the Chinese gov hacked into the accounts of dissidents. I admire that move. But this stinks of the security industry lobby.
WinMo was embarrassing, WinPho useless by comparison unless you want a 'feature' phone that looks like a smart phone.
So this is how they can keep their mobile division profitable. Simple business practises like demanding money from competitors in exchange for protection from litigation.