Oversight, what oversight!
So, the government keeps telling up that the security services have 'robust' oversight and we should trust them.
Well I think that this goes to prove that the so called oversight has failed miserably.
11 posts • joined 5 May 2010
This really pisses me off, no-one has the right to determine when a debate is over, especially not the government.
The whole thing sounds like someone had a hissy fit, and didn't think things through.
Next thing will be 'D' notices (if they still exist), best of luck with that in our internationally connected world.
One of the things that really annoys me is the attitude that somehow the rest of us are some kind of idiot that don't have the ability to understand what Scientology is saying.
If you think that somehow you are superior to the rest of us then you are even more deluded than I already thought.
So far we have had two versions of a voluntary self-regulation system for the press, well they worked out well didn't they?
From what I can see Lord Justice Leveson, is not proposing statutory regulation of the Press, just giving statutory backing to a new regulator.
But I guess Cameron needs to keep his paymaster happy.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2020