Why break things with gratuitous change ?
Microsoft does not seem to understand the concept of stability.
2646 publicly visible posts • joined 29 May 2007
Yes, I could make a Linux box last 10 years but I'd rather spend my time being productive myself than spending it on keeping my kit productive
You are suggesting that I spend lots of time maintaining the system as the hardware is old. Not true. Replacing the PSU and CPU fan [I forgot to mention] did not take long.
Other admin: apt-get update/upgrade
, backups, etc, all would be needed on new hardware.
The most time spent was when I moved from CentOS to Debian after RedHat went rogue on the GPL.
there was no free oxygen so why is it thought necessary for life on Europa ?
for the UK government to commission a local authority managements system that it would release as open source ? An up-front cost that would save billions later on. Call it LAsoft.
I am aware that not all local authorities have the same requirements but the core ones must be similar. It could also influence legislation: ie Parliament not enacting laws until LAsoft was able to support it.
I know that the failed unified NHS system casts a long shadow here, but maybe those mistakes could be learned. Part of it is making local authorities have common working procedures unless there was good reason not to - eg Urban/rural requirements.
A home grown approach would also stop us bleeding money to large overseas corporations and would build expertise in the UK.
Timescale ? 5 - 10 years maybe.
this moron\wcrook should be required to personally compensate everyone whose email he compromised.
A minimum of £5/head would be good. This might deter other, in the future, of doing likewise.
Every Saturday in the local market in the stocks would be a nice addition - especially of the rotten tomatoes were to be paid for by him.
be they owned by a white cat stroking Blofeld or anyone else.
The worst that these restrictions can do is to delay unapproved use of AI. Big crooks and national governments (**) will be able to get what they want, especially governments. Are AIs being put to good use ? The answer depends on where your affiliations lie.
** Sometimes I am not sure of the distinction
Taking the average of regular volume HP cartridges as 5.7ml then 270,315 of them is 1,544 litres or in el-reg units 266 footballs.
That depends on how large Martians are ?
The Romans defined a mile as 1,000 paces.
All sorts of entities meddle with GPS, does this make it twice as hard to disrupt ?
How much more does it cost to add Galileo to GPS in an aircraft or missile ?
that aircraft GPS receivers should only look upwards as that is where the GPS satellites are ? Yes: I know that there are not a vast number of the satellites and so that some might, at times, appear close to the horizon ...
Different for GPS receivers in cars/ships/... which are not high up.
Meyers then talks about applications (eg Powerpoint).
Microsoft seems to approach security just as it does testing of software updates: toss it over the wall and let customers do the QA for them.
This approach is bad enough for updates but criminal for security.
would it not be cheaper for them to enable the machines to connect to an address on the local network - ie somewhere reachable by the house holder's WIFI ? Then there would be zero cost to Haier.
The downside to Haier would be loss of all that lovely data as to how often I wash my sox and underwear.
Exactly this. Outside the nerds/techies that inhabit el-Reg most people do not care about the operating system. As long as they can "go on the Internet" ("Eh, what do you mean 'browser' - what is that ?"), play music, games, edit a document, ... they are happy -- especially if things do not change at all.
Most would quite happily have stuck with Windows XP if microsoft had not killed it.
And who benefits from those long hours ? Today the Grauniad reports: World’s five richest men double their money as poorest get poorer
As W S Gilbert wrote in the Mikado Let the punishment fit the crime.
was an appalling row back on climate policy, this was done after the Uxbridge by-election as he thought that he could curry favour with the electorate -- thus putting party before climate; what a pathetic leader. He is accused of having ‘fingers in ears’ over climate change.
Pushing the date back helps to cover up inadequacy of provision of charging points - yet another government failure.
This sounds like a complete nightmare.
Then what happens when it does the wrong thing ?
These will end up being used to deal with customers, especially by those companies that try and funnel you through dealing with queries only via a web form. When your situation is not one of the top 90% and you end up corresponding with an AI ... I suspect that many will just give up (which the company will like) and, next time, order from company that still uses humans (preferably UK based).
opening up another front in the war that these governments (both being terrorist) open up on each other. The only result is that innocent civilians are harmed and that their opposition becomes more enraged and do punches back hurting yet more innocents.
Of course there is virtue signalling "We delivered warnings to emergency services across the country before the operation began, ..." but that is complete bollocks that will be lapped up by partisan press.
If they want to do something: use their skills for true defence by protecting against intrusions from the other side ― but I doubt that they will as it is less exciting to brag about with their mates in the pub/... at the end of the day.
In the run up to Christmas what I want most is peace in this world, not slaughter of innocents on behalf of self serving politicians.
the main message of which is "trust no one but us to tell you the truth".
You might want to check how truthful your favourite media is by looking at https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/
Don't mean to sound like an ad for Car-X, I just used it as an example because I'm happy with this one particular shop near where I live.
I do even better, I use a man who arrives, takes my car from my house to his lockup/... and brings it back when he is done. He knows what he is doing and is not expensive. He does not need to advertise - word of mouth and he is busy.
Which is all that I really care about.
It now seems clear that stories of Putin ordering that his plane should crash were malicious. It is just that a lack of parts meant that it was not properly maintained.
I am glad that this is cleared up.
I have never had a FB account, use Javascript blockers, etc. However FB know about me since friends use it, mention me and have me in their contacts list. So FB has almost certainly got a shadow profile of me, something that it has built without my consent - which seems to be a breach of the GDPR. Something that they should be challenged in court about.
They might not be able to show me advertising, targetted or not, but knowing who I know helps them build their graph of personal interests and so must help them earn. How much I do not know, but not £0.