What is the fall out cost
of all of this to innocent business/individuals that have to deal malware and other crap that these people throw around ? Where do we send a bill ?
2650 publicly visible posts • joined 29 May 2007
BTW, I keep hearing that US sysadmins of multinationals now should not be allowed into data centres in other nations - anyone know why?
Because such sysadmins must obey the laws of the USA. This means that they can be ordered by their government to spy (copy data, insert backdoors, ...) from where they are employed, even if their employer has nothing to do with the USA.
If you handle anything remotely sensitive you should not use a USA citizen. I find this amusing, when I were a lad you would not employ a citizen of the USSR for much the same reason; how the world has changed!
''that is a nice little data center that you have there, it would be unfortunate if it were compromised''.
OK: they don't want your cash[**]; my point is more about use of English, claiming to do one thing while doing something very different. Those who want to believe it will do so and loudly shout that they are the good guys.
[**] well, not directly. They get it indirectly via the taxes that you pay.
if we remove leap-seconds. OK: it probably will not have any real impact on my kids or grand kids, but as the centuries roll on the clocks will ever get more out of sync with that yellow thing upstairs. When they do come to fix it the problem will be huge: several hours to shift and computer systems which are based on the idea that there are always 86400 seconds in every day without exception.
I am sorry that the real world is more complicated than some would wish - but that is how it is.
Better to get used to it now than have our great, great, ... grandkids curse us for idleness.
the only problem i would see is getting the users use to Linux.
Most users don't care, they don't really know what the difference between Linux and MS Windows is; they are only interested in what their machine will do for them: can they read email, browse the web, edit a document and print - that covers 90% of non game functions.
Don't even talk about applications: most users don't understand or care.
Because if it becomes known that he was an ordinarily skilled sysadmin then they will be shown up as incompetent but not dealing with the common (or should be expected) case of a disaffected worker. As we have seen many times with these sort of people their primary interest is in protecting their own back sides and laying the blame elsewhere - just remember how they pursued Garry McKinnon who had the 'genius' idea of using default passwords to access systems.
I do not know how clever Snowden is, however I suspect that it did not need genius level skills to do what he did, just a bit of determination.
The GPL obliges you to give a copy of the code to anyone to who distribute a binary. If someone just uses the code remotely (eg a web application) you don't have to give the code since the binary/script runs on your own machine.
The AGPL is GPL + you need to make available a copy of the code to those who use it remotely (eg web).
This is a good license to publish under since it means that if someone uses your code in a public way (eg web site) they need to give enhancements back.
It is isolated enough to need accomodation, a canteen, etc. So there will be maintainance, cooks, ...
See: http://alma.mtk.nao.ac.jp/e/aboutalma/office/location.html
The law sys you have to hand over your passwords. Otherwise you go to jail.
I though that you had to EITHER provide passwords or provide them with plain tex of what was encrypted or controled access by a password.
I just hope that he changed all his passwords everywhere as soon as possible; although I suspect that they rummaged through his email and accessed whatever machines remotely before he could change them.
Pamela Jones, a voice of relative sanity on US legal issues in IT, shut down the Groklaw blog this morning.
Really ? I have just been to http://groklaw.net/, it is still there.
What she does say is something very different:
The owner of Lavabit tells us that he's stopped using email and if we knew what he knew, we'd stop too.
There is no way to do Groklaw without email. Therein lies the conundrum.
What to do?
''No, a phone without a base station transmits at ZERO power. It LISTENS for the cell search, ...''
But it probably needs to reply to any base station at high power as it is a long way away.
The best way of reducing transmitted power could be for every plane to have a set of dummy base stations that the 'phones could lock on to, and being close would not need to transmit at high power. Because everything is low power it should not interfere with the real base stations outside of the airplane. Several would be needed for the various networks that the 'phones are subscribed to.
A workable idea or complete cobblers ?
as these can be relatively easily broken, but all the other stuff: like my list of phone contacts that is now in the hands of the NSA. I would be happier if I could back up these settings to my own server.
More worrying that wifi passwords are email login passwords; it would be interesting to set up an email account that is not used anywhere, configure in the android phone and see what loggs in from where.
I can understand that some evidence might need to be secret, but why does the court itself need to be secret ? Also: where is the order, why cannot we see it (maybe with some parts redacted) ?
This especially so when they are slurping everyone's data, ie it is not a targetted set of naughty boys. The only possible justification would be real, imminent threats ... maybe it has to be secret so that we don't know that there is, in fact, little justification.
Ie what should be on it ? Will the list grow to contain things that are, by some, deemed ''bad'' ?
I assume that it will contain sex sites, but what about other things that can damage young minds, eg: violence, astrology, suicide, anorexic encouraging, religion ??
I could add: BNP, taliban & facebook since some would regard those as damaging ?
Daily Mail readers will never agree with Guardian readers, so best to leave it down to the individual household and what they see as right for their kids -- ie their prejudices.
MS helps the NSA gain access to data in its cloud http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jul/11/microsoft-nsa-collaboration-user-data
Now: tell me why anyone would trust it.
USA: OK, I admit that we were trying to crack your machines
China: We both knew that we were probing each other's cracks and knew that the other knew. We just did not like being honest about it.
USA: Friends again ?
China: Let's shake on it.
USA & China: Great, we can now go back to spying on who really worries us: our own citizens.
Milk ruins a good cuppa, the flavour is lost under the sweet milk.
Tea without milk is a completely different drink, much more delicate and softer.
For those who have not tried it: you need a good tea (not a supermarket own label), don't brew it long.
The only downside is the residue left on the side of the mug, a small price to pay.
That is rather like saying "we won't ship Perl because we ship Python instead. They are both scripting languages and you can do much the same thing in either." But that does not help if youhave an application written in Perl.
Similarly: there are many applications written to use Mysql so RedHat have to ship something that is Mysql compatible so that their uses can run them. Agreed: Postgresql might be better for a new project, but that is a different story.
Microsoft may well be doing the best that it can; however it is still subject to the USA Patriot Act.
It would be interesting to have a MS customer (I am am not) write them a letter explicity addressing this issue. I can't complain about them having to obey it, but they should at least come clean.
I lived in a large house, 40 - 50 of us. We played space invaders in the long sitting room.
Most lined up across the room advancing slowly, menacingly shouting ''Boom, boom'' towards the other end where a lone defender hurled cusions & pillows at the invaders.
Those were the days!
She was the fictional Doctor's daughter and in real live is daughter of the 5th Dr and spouse of the 10th Doctor.