Is SAP trying to become Oracle ?
It is moving in the same direction.
2838 publicly visible posts • joined 29 May 2007
please just employ me at the very reasonable salary of £200,000/year and I promise that I will try my hardest to code something that has a GCHQ only back door.
It is not a lot of money for the government to save us from evil terrorists & drug dealers (do think of the children), but will bolster my pension fund nicely - I only have a few years before retirement.
If we get a good designer who can make the app look pretty then all these nasty people will be seduced into using it rather than some free open source stuff.
Please, pretty please!
how about we then get down with real equality and have full paid paternity for men to be even with women
What happens if a mum wants time off due to a sick/... child: it is usually granted without a fuss. If a dad does the same thing: often there is resistance from managers.
Following divorce: the kids go to mum 90% of the time & dad struggles to see them; mother then complains that her career/pay has suffered as a result. Share the childcare and everyone benefits.
So has this brouhaha finally woken the NHS to the fact that giving patient data to Google is not a clever idea ?
Has Google deleted the data or just said that they have ?
The Norks are rational enough to know that if they nuked the UK or anywhere else then they would be reduced to glowing embers -- look at their recent actions. The summary of this report says as much. They will huff & puff and carry out more missile tests just enough to worry people in other countries.
What they are trying to do is to distract the focus from ''they abused personal information'' to ''how many ?''
This is not too far from how political messages work these days -- sod the facts, produce vague, emotional messages that most listeners will interpret differently as being good for them.
OK: politicians have always done that, it used to be called 'spin'; but these days it seems more deliberate - we are in a 'post truth' era where people believe things despite clear evidence to the contrary.
It might be worth making your browser add a X-T&C header that said something like ''If you misuse my data then you pay me £1,000,000''. It might be hard to make it stick in the courts, but part of the problem is one way T&Cs, you either get to accept it down to the last comma or nothing at all**.
This is part of the Internet 'wild west' that is well overdue regulation; there should be standard T&Cs++ that have been prepared by even handed (consumer/business) lawyers - that people could thus trust.
IETF might even make an official T&C header.
** I admit to being one of the few who I know who does read T&Cs and frequently refuse to accept and thus not use some web site.
++ With schedules to specify things like delivery dates, etc.
Log files should be kept to monitor access, specifying who accessed a system and why, and these should be available to national data protection agencies and the European Data Protection Supervisor on request.
They should also be made available to the individual who's records are being looked at. It is s/he who is really going to take an interest and ask why the ex's brother is looking at their record.
You do not have fixed line Internet; Virgin provides you with a TV connection and chucks in some Internet.
I can see why BT might offer cheaper to non Internet people - the line can be cheaper & the card in the telephone exchange is POTS only (so cheaper), no load on its ATM network, etc. Well if you get Internet via Virgin/who-ever-cable then BT do not need to provide any of the expensive kit either.
The EU has some sanity by explicitly saying it cannot be copyrighted:https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/05/eus-top-court-apis-cant-be-copyrighted-would-monopolise-ideas/
Ooooh - another area of EU/USA courts disagreeing, time to order more popcorn!
I hope that the EU view prevails.
in the past few months they disabled the messaging part from mobile website forcing people to use their Messaging app
Does this not fall under the computer misuse act ? You have not given FB permission to make such a change ... but it does it.
and an UTF document will never be in "plain text" and an UTF document will never be in "plain text"
In a modern environment plain text is UTF-8.
Anyway the distinction being drawn is between a structured binary file (eg .ofd or .docx) and a text file containing some kind of markup (eg: markdown, LaTeX or even troff!) Both have their advantages.
to monitor children than for adults (teachers in this case) to know what the kids in their charge are up to.
What kids need is to trust adults and be confident enough that they will seek guidance Adults should spend time with them, adults should get to know and care for them -- and the kids be aware that they are being cared for. A computer is not a substitute for that.
Also: kids will get up to a little mischief, and have done so for millennia, it is good for them to push boundaries, to explore as they get older. Feel the consequences of going too far. What about the perve from the Internet I hear people say -- that is what you need to build adult/child trust for -- so that the adult will get to know and so react/guide in what is really a relatively rare situation.
Sexting: education as to why it is a bad idea, then support/admonishment when it does happen. Making criminals out of kids for this is over the top.
Bullying: this is not new, on-line bullying is just a development, just as when kids stopped using slates and started using paper in the classroom.
Naughty pictures on the Internet ? A natural curiosity. 'No' is not the answer (& impossible to achieve), but educate the differences between sex & relationships, romance & love. Not new anyway -- in my day it was smuggled copies of Playboy.
All of the above need adults (teachers & parents) to spend time with kids, get to know them.
The trouble with a solicitor driven risk averse society is that kids are not allowed to be kids.
in a few years time, in spite of having done a search to try to determine if he is an honourable character - which draws a blank because he has been 'forgotten'. Can I seek compensation from google/etc or the courts or ... ?
Right to be forgotten should be about personal things (affairs, etc) and for those under 25; not those who have indulged in criminal activity.
.
Anyway: why go after search engines, surely the newspapers, etc, are the right targets ?
Individual government departments each seeking to save a few bob off their own budget; whereas, maybe for a little more, they could 'buy British' - which creates jobs, etc, in the UK that DO pay tax, that DO build up UK expertise, that DOES make them better able to complete internationally, that DOES keep British data within our borders, ...
Overall a few different choices ends up benefiting Britain overall.
But politicians won't do that: each trying to bring their departmental budgets down and, anyway, the benefits of beefing up British business probably won't be noticeable until after the next election -- so they don't give a toss!
other than a few nerds. However at the time the politicos made great hay of it being the Norks - which suits their political ends of portraying Kim Jong-il as being the current root of all evil and a great nuclear threat - not ½ as many words spoken when Putin did the same last week.
I'm not saying that Kim is a nice bloke, but lets start to compare him to Bashar al-Assad, Robert Mugabe, ...
otherwise they will simply refer customers to the manufacturer; which is probably somewhere in China that ignore complaints. This will ensure that resellers will sell stuff that causes them least problems, ie kit that it well designed, tested and is well supported, etc. If a manufacturer cannot provide assurance, etc, they won't get sales - simples.
Also product (support) lifetimes should be reasonable. This does not mean 'until the next model is released', but the real lifetime that one expects. So: for a fridge - maybe 20 years, light switch - 50 years.
Telnetted into various Unix machines, wanted to restart the one in the server room. Whoops - I forgot which machine I was logged into and typed 'reboot' to a machine on the other side of the planet. It did not come up, had to wait until teatime for the guys there to come in and push a button :-(
We all did silly things when we were young and naive...
Agreed
I think there also needs to be a Statute of limitations of articles.
But only in some circumstances; perhaps some combination of:
* Petty crime, eg stealing a car, getting into fights, using (not dealing) drugs, ...
* Under a certain age. I would put this at acts done under 25, 5 years after the act was done. 25 might seem high but a magistrate friend of mine tell me that she saw the same youths time & again, then at 25 they asked for other things 'to be taken into account' - then she would not see them again. It appears to be an age at which many of us finally grow up.
* Maybe acts done under 20 should drop out of sight after 2 years.
You just tell the advertiser you've served loads of ads and they'll believe you and give you tons of cash! Don't know why no-one's thought of this before....
Oh I do understand that it is harder. But it could be done ... independent audits & a bit of trust (which is sadly lacking in today's commerce).
The biggest problem is going to be deciding which ads to show on which page. In some ways it should be simpler: what is the page topic? Put something related. But ad flingers seem to want something much more dynamic & up to the minute. But fixed ads worked in print, so maybe a retro-ad movement might be a solution.
it because they are not displaying them as in-line content generated by their web site; they have put ad-monger's javascript in their web site that would put so called 'tailored' adverts on their web page.
It is this javascript driven shmuck that I object to; partly because of the attempted tracking, partly because it eats bandwidth/slows the browser and partly as it is often garish, auto-plays noise/sound.
Go back to discrete ads served off your own machines and you will find that most of it gets displayed. Yes: you might earn less per page impression, but something is better than the nothing that you will get if I go elsewhere.
To one person a 'hug' might mean 'sympathy' (over a loss, misfortune, ...) while another might read it as an attempt of physical, sexual, ... closeness. The interpretation might even depend on how you feel about the person saying/hearing the word.
This big problem with this code of conduct is that it places too much weight on the perception of the 'listener' of the comments; a code of conduct should deal with the intent of the 'speaker'.
Add to this that we are dealing with people from all over the world with varying abilities in English/whatever, and who use words that have different subtleties of meaning in different cultures. Just because a geek can speak good techno-babble does not mean that they understand the nuances of all words.
Also we all make mistakes: how often has a smart/funny comment seemed great in your head but you realise a disaster when it comes out of your mouth ?
I am worried that someone will find themselves with a ban and either not understand why or feel that they are maligned by the ban.
I also worry that people will abuse the code of conduct to hurt someone who they dislike.
That is part of Microsoft's problem. One CPU/instruction-set has really made things simpler for them and their users. However it is really difficult for them to change; 16 -> 32 -> 64 bit has caused enough problems.
This is something that Unix has addressed from the start. I remember 30+ years ago porting my programs to at least 3 different instruction-sets before I considered it ready for others to test. So different platforms have always been part of *nix programmer & user expectations, part of the culture.
Yes: need to think a bit more, but once you have the idea not that hard.
He has a new fridge installed on Air Force one at double the price of Opportunity's annual maintainance.