Please explain to me ...
why I need all of this to talk on the phone and send/receive text messages ?
2650 publicly visible posts • joined 29 May 2007
Some 8 years ago I opened a bank account with Santander, they did not understand security:
* they sent the username for on-line banking in a clear text email; the password was in another email sent 1/2 second later.
* we went in, took all the documents needed to open a bank account (passport, etc); they took a copy; a month later ''we have lost them, please scan and send the images by email". (I refused to do so)
* I complained that important, security related documents were lost. They assured me that they were quite safe: but were unable to explain how they knew so since they did not know where they were.
And so it went on. The account has been closed for many years, final statement showing a NIL balance - but every 6 months I get a letter telling me that there are a couple of quid there (I have checked - there is not).
Muppets
I don't understand how the security of a device is dependent upon its bus width.
More room for ASLR (Address Space Layout Randomisation), which makes buffer overflow attacks harder to exploit. Windows 10 uses so much RAM that there is not much left over for ASLR if all that you have are 32 bits of virtual address space.
My guess anyway.
But were the packages not signed with the public key of the software vendor/distributor ? Or are we dealing with a bunch like slack ?
OK: I don't know how this is done in the windows world, and if you have never installed anything from the vendor you will not have the key (so getting it could be spoofed) ... but Skype is from Microsoft and so the Windows machine will have their signing key ... so if the installer does not complain we need to ask how the spooks got their malware signed to make it look legitimate.
I suspect that you mean ''laptop left on train'', or similar, ie misplaced - and possibly in the wrong hands.
This is very different from ''data accidentally deleted''. There is sometimes a requirement for data to be kept for certain periods. I observe that embarrassing data, especially when asked for by a subject access request, has a propensity to become ''lost - accidentally deleted''.
These two should be counted separately.
Could we please start calling the ''left on train'' incidents ''misplaced'', not ''lost''.
This makes unsolicited goods something that the supplier cannot demand payment for. This is 123reg trying to indulge in inertia selling ... so if they renew the domain without the customer saying they want it: then they are acting illegally.
Not that acting illegally seems to bother many businesses these days.
If they grab the money from your bank account: just get the bank to reverse the charge and let 123reg whistle for their money.
Most people think that this means that the boffins has worked out how to do all manner of technical wonders.
Just as important is: have the politicians grown up enough to not destroy the planet. I used to think that this meant not throwing nukes around, but increasingly realise that it means controlling expansion and population growth to what the ecosystem can sustain.
Of the two: the harder is the politics. Politicians are just big children who have the gift of the gab and persuade the rest of us to vote for them (or self interested psychopaths who become dictators). They have little interest in the long term of anything (including the ecosystem) as long as they get what they want now.
is something that middle class people must do. It is not a burden that is to be felt by the very rich or by large corporations.
If large corporations were made to pay taxes just like the rest of us: where would all those nice consultant type jobs come from once MPs and top civil servants retire ?
to assure users that the the cable/... will not damage their expensive iBling.
I cannot see why Apple would want a chip in the cable ... to me this smells like printer vendors putting chips in printer ink cartridges - as a means of trying to stop perfectly good independent suppliers from undercutting their overpriced stuff.
the managers who knew about it and probably asked him to write the code. This needs to go up as high as possible in the management structure. Most of them are probably happy that someone else has taken the blame.
The only way of making change is my making it so painful for the read decision makers that they, and their successors, will never do this again.
This is much the same thing. Guy discovers gaping hole in computers, is held to blame and arrested - this is an attempt by the site owners (in this case USA military) from having to admit that their own staff are incompetent. It is called saving face that just ends up showing the site owner to be arrogant & stupid.
Fine £80,000 - new business as a result £xxx ??? The fine should be in excess of what they gained otherwise fines will just be seen as an extra cost.
Also: 1/2 the fine should be paid by board members, personally - out of income after tax. Unless it hurts someone in authority: behaviour will not change.
The website where you can register as not having a TV asks for too much information.
Why do you need to register that you don't need one ?
If you really do not need one, then just don't buy one. If they come round, just say that you don't need one. You don't need to tell M&S that you do not need any new shirts.
If you are feeling nice you could write them a letter, but I cannot see why you are under any obligation to do so.
I have not taken some 'services' because I did not like the T&Cs.
Some, unfortunately, one does not have the choice - like some government sites where the T&Cs are complete cobblers.
The clause that I hate the most is the one that says ''we may change these T&Cs at any time, you agree to check for updates'' - how often am I expected to read umpteen pages of drivel with no indication of if (and where) changes have been made?
These clauses should be outlawed.
Given the ongoing set of wikileaks revelations I would be surprised if they did not have a means of subverting Let's Encrypt.
They backport security fixes so that holes get closed without affecting any of the functionality of the software in question.
All decent OS vendors do that. RedHat do the same (Red Hat Enterprise, CentOS), as do Suse and, I suspect, other Linux/Unix distros. Microsoft seem to as well ('seem' - this is what I read, I don't use any MS product).
Where they vary is how quickly they backport fixes and how far back they do it - ie how long something is supported for.
It's a library specifically labelled for cryptography. It's likely to have been high on their study list.
And they probably found it and would have known that their counterparts in <insert name of currently despised foreign power> would probably have also found it. But rather than protect us by having a quiet word with the GnuPG maintainers they chose to not tell anyone -- presumably hoping to break crypto on messages.
One does wonder which side the TLAs are on ? The general population or some shadowy masters ?
how running an important application ''out in the cloud'' is better than running on your own machines ? It is not just subject to failures of the cloud provider, but also vulnerable to that man who goes round the country in a JCB randomly digging up network/broadband cables. Not to mention the privacy/security aspects (who does the cloud provider share your data with ?)
OK: you can save a bit by not employing a sysadmin or bothering to do your own backups, but how much does it cost to not be able to do anything for 1/2 a day (or more) ?
BTW: this is NOT a flame against Microsoft, but any vital cloud based service.
Somehow I don't think warships are connected to the Internet
The SS Yorktown in 1998 was not connected to the Internet, but a rogue packet in the ship's intranet took the MS Windows XP machines down and it needed to be towed back to port.
Maybe the Royal Navy wants to shows that it is also capable of gross cock up ?
of the likes of GCHQ and the NSA to hoard vulnerabilities that they find. The Russians, and likely other ''bad guys'', are probably going to find the same set of vulnerabilities.
If they really wanted to do their job of protecting us they would tell the vendor and we would all be a lot safer.