Re: You can see his point
No, they rely on Microsoft to do that
2855 publicly visible posts • joined 29 May 2007
his ravings are becoming ever more the stuff of fantasies. Maybe he is smoking something really good, or perhaps spending too much time close to Trump has gotten him infected with some nasty brain worm.
He talks about Chinese law ... I hope that someone reminded him of USA law, in particular the Patriot Act.
The UK is a sovereign state, we make decisions according to our own interests. We do not want to be bullied by another country: especially one that is wrapping up their commercial interests as a security issue.
I believe that Pompeo is trotting out this fake news on behalf of Trump - someone who shows no restraint on lying to get what he wants.
Please fix the proven spying in kit made in the USA before you complain about unproven spying in kit from elsewhere.
As I see it this is the Linux kernel running under a MS hypervisor. This means that the MS kernel sees everything that goes in & out of the Linux kernel and is so available to be slurped up and exfiltrated via telemetry. MS can then inspect/sell as it wants. Your Linux system is now not secure.
You might think that this would be hard to do; but one of the most sensitive devices is the keyboard (think typed passwords). Snooping of this would be easy and the bandwidth needed to take and forward to the NSA would not be large.
So: do not use one of these machines to ssh to something precious.
please remind me if they have been after those who Assange exposed for doing wrong; eg the helicopter crew who laughed while shooting innocent people ?
This is a case of 'shoot the messenger' - there is a clear message to other who might expose USA wrong doing.
Isn't that what things like WireShark are for?
You won't see what is being sent as the telemetry is encrypted.
Microsoft is right to encrypt it as it may contain personal information. This is why a tool needs to be provided that the user can run on their PC.
Microsoft said it would split data gathered into "required" and "optional."
So: people cannot switch off telemetry. But will Microsoft publish a program that lets the PC owner see what data has been sent to Microsoft/NSA ? That program must be open source so that we can verify that it is telling the truth.
This is all rather ironic considering the fuss about Huawei.
If they blab this probable bollocks about Huawei how much trust should we give to anything else that they say ?
What have we had: hacking from North Korea, Putin meddling in USA elections, Kaspersky Labs spying for Russia, ... ? I offer no opinion on any of these, but I down rate what the USA claims.
Of course, they say nothing about: Cisco routers tampered by the NSA and don't ask questions about what Microsoft telemetry is really about.
Google is doing the right thing here; the bandits are the likes of Intuit. They have an agreement with the USA tax people and then try to run around that agreement. They should be hit with a corporation changing fine - but this won't happen as they have paid too many politicians from their slush fund.
What operating systems, version; what PDF readers, etc ? Some details as to where holes have been found in the last year or few.
Eg: is MS Windows 10 any better than 8 ? What versions of MacOS ? What Linux distros ? Or do they assume that everyone runs MS Windows 10 ?
OK: can't predict the future, but knowing what has been vulnerable in the past can suggest what to avoid.
They might even do so, in an unusual fit of honesty; but what they will not do is to delete the social graph/connections that they have learned as a result - this is what I would like to see deleted.
Maybe punishment should be that Zuckerberg's address book should be made public, see how he likes that. Although that would be unfair on those who are exposed as talking to him.
My main desktop is a 7 y/old AMD Bulldozer, 32 GB RAM. I have had to replace some fans, the PSU & a disk but that is about it; oh - I upgraded the screen a while back. I run Linux so upgrade problems are not an issue. It is still plenty fast enough. I expect to continue to run this for a few more years.
Laptop: a small HP Stream. Not a heavy CPU which means the battery lasts. Cheap: so that when I drop it under a bus I won't cry (much).
That is the only possible reply to a bully; then the rest of us refuse to share security data with the USA.
This seems to be as much about economic competition that security/spying.
It seems that the quality of Huawei code is poor, but that is a different/unrelated topic and seems no worse than the code in their competitors' kit.
We all know that the USA wants to lock Assange up for as long as possible to frighten anyone else who is thinking if lifting the lid on unsavory actions done by (or on behalf of) the USA. This is all about punishing the messenger, not the guilty.
If they do get their hands on him: he will not get a fair trial - so the UK should refuse to extradite him.
It will be interesting to see how supine our politicians are ... yes, yes, I know that the judges will supposedly make the decisions, but it is likely that they will be heavily leaned on. I wonder what the deal will be ? Give them Assange and we won't need to take chlorinated chicken in a post Brexit trade deal ?
BTW: have any of those troops shown shooting up innocent people yet been put on trial ?
This is what he was afraid of: the USA, somehow or another, finding a way of getting him over the pond. Once there he would likely spend a very long time in chokey, on some pretext of another. The real reason is that he embarrassed the USA by exposing things and some there want revenge.
All that the median number tells us is how many men/women go for the higher paid jobs or work longer hours - which, to an extent, is up to the individual. There might be some prejudice in the hiring and promotion of people, that will be harder to flush out as it will need careful analysis of the decisions made that result in a job offer or promotion.
A like for like comparison (ie job rôle, experience, hours worked) will tell us if there is real wage discrimination - this difference should be zero.
If all that data is held by Amazon, a USA company subject to USA laws, then how long before the NSA/CIA/... issues them with a National security letter demanding a slurp of all UK tax data.
How can they be so stupid ? Or don't they care ?
All this brouhaha about Huawei and we just give it to the USA!!!
CPU clock does not tell you a lot. Different chips have different numbers of processors. Different processors do different numbers of IPCC (Instructions Per Clock Cycle). Different Instruction sets do different amounts of work per instruction (think: RISC/CISC, or x68_64 vs ARM vs MIPS vs mainframe ...). See here.
Work done is the only real metric. Something like SPEC is a good starting point. OK: different types of work load use the CPU in different ways so SPEC is not always that good, but it is a much better metric that clock speed.
This will make it harder for the journalists as vendors like to quote GHz as it is easy and many people don't know better. But most el-reg readers do know better ... so, please, can we have something more meaningful.
Another example of crap software talked about y/day. I doubt that Huawei is worse than many vendors who ship other closed source on their kit. Huawei sells hardware, the software that makes it work is just an inconvenience and so will put as little effort (== cost) into it as it can get away with.
BTW: some will claim that this is an example of Chinese government back hole in Huawei kit; possible but I doubt it.
You say it'll be more expensive
The real question is ''who bears the cost?'' The answer is ''not the development organisation'', eg not the vendor but its customers. So the benefit to who has to pay the extra cost for the reliability gains little, a bit less work for its call center maybe, but that is about it. Its customers however: waste huge amounts of time on work arounds or become frustrated - but does the vendor care ?
The other cost of producing reliable programs is time. The extra time taken means that the competition might get their product to market first and so get the customers and maybe even the market. One company that has used this ''get something that vaguely works and let the customers suffer'' method is Microsoft; it did this in its early days, got better for a while and is now getting worse again.
Another part of the problem is that customers getting redress is rare. We are pushed to accept major bugs. It is hard for the customer to go elsewhere, they have already made an investment, changing is costly - and anyway: will the competition be much better ? Probably not: commercial factors dictate not.
Having to buy in (*) something to fill in 7 numbers on a web-form seems pointless
HMRC is pursuing the unicorn that by making everyone use an accounts package that tax fraud will be magically eliminated. They don't care a toss that it will cost all of us huge sums that bring us little benefit.
This is especially onerous for small businesses who do not need costly accounts s/ware, eg private landlords. It is also a pain for those who have written their own accounting programs.
From what I hear the amount of detail that will be required will increase over time, which means more time wasted entering, into accounts programs, information that is useless to the business, such as one purchases: supplier invoice numbers and VAT numbers.
to take on some of the function of the MS marketing department ? Pushing this stuff to school kids thus ensuring that it is what they will expect to use when they enter employment ... and complain if given anything else.
Oh, you mean Wales is paying MS, not the other way round !!!
Education should be about teaching kids how to use computers and a variety of software products.
Training is teaching kids to use one product.
How low our education has slumped.
If you need to call that because of their screw up: you should add the cost of the premium call to any refund that you get. If they argue: add the cost of your time that they have wasted.
You can always find an alternative number at saynoto0870.com
I seem to recall PuTTY has had a mixed history when it comes to security (e.g IIRC there was a period where they had a trojanised copy hosted on the official website for quite some time before it got noticed).
PuTTY on MS Windows has a much greater problem than a, now fixed, trojan copy of PuTTY.
The whole operating system is a trojan, it has an in built key logger. You are supposed to be able to turn key logging off, but you can't completely switch off telemetry, what gets sent is encrypted (from the machine owner) -- so how do you verify that key stroke stealing is really disabled ?
I will not use PuTTY on a Windows machine - I would just not feel safe.
It would make it harder for the USA to claim that Huawei networking kit is riddled with Chinese Gov't spyware. Especially if Huawei makes it easy for the local network admin to install his own compiled copy of NOS.
Granted the claim could be made that the hardware is spooked, but that is harder.
Next question: will CISCO also support NOS - so we can be free of NSA 'additions' ?
good news for farmers, not so good for shoppers
But:
* UK farmers will become richer and thus pay more taxes, so the rest of us will need to pay less tax to 'balance the books'.
* Import tax also means less tax needed.
So at first glance it is good for tax payers, but the benefit will be felt most by the richer who will gain most by any tax cuts (assuming that this happens). Alternatively UK government could spend the extra tax receipts on helping the less well off - cushion them from price hikes.
But: it is all too complicated, and exposed to political whimsy, for anyone to predict with any accuracy.
people keep on asking me if I think that Brexit will be a good idea. I always say ''I don't know as I don't know what the UK relationship with the EU will be after Brexit.''
Remember: all the brouhaha is about the *exit deal*, getting on to three years post referendum and they have hardly talked about what the post Brexit relationship will be. So how can anybody pass opinion on something that, for now, is a vague wish list ?
Refusing to talk about the new relationship until after exit strikes me as stupidity in the extreme; or perhaps political game playing.