OK: Facebook is a bad boy ...
MPs (appear) to finally understand that. What about the rest of them ? How about starting with Google.
Most of the public, unfortunately, will have tut-tutted a couple of times and continued as before.
2650 publicly visible posts • joined 29 May 2007
If you enjoyed this El Reg article then you will enjoy this book.
Ah, to be a school boy again!
What should they do with the second stage other than throw it away ?
One idea: park it in orbit and put it up for sale. The cost of taking it up X hundred miles has been paid, so sometime it might be of interest to someone who is building something large upstairs and who needs a lot of metal. I'm assuming that it could be melted/reformed into something else.
a unit near GCHQ that would check/validate mobile operating systems and apps to ensure that they did not have back-doors/spy-ware in them. I would want their results (& checksums published & end-user verifiable) by equivalent Cells in China & Russia - I doubt that the 3 would collude enough to agree common spy-ware.
Hmm: thinking about my last sentence -- I'm not sure.
the user has paid for the 'phone ... the ROI on security updates is zero. Far better to encourage the user to buy a new model that has got lots of shiny new (useless) features.
No manufacturer brags long term patch availability, so punters do not think about it as a purchasing criterion.
The only way to get them to do it would be to make the manufacturer liable in some way - as with motor cars. That will be a long time coming.
The same applies to all IoT stuff.
Eg get someone from EFF (Electronic Frontier Foundation) or similar to ask the questions.
Second best is to get EFF to write them so that the politicians can still look clever by asking them; the trouble with this is that they won't be able to ask the right follow up questions - to the obfuscating answers.
Oh yeh ... in my experience Samsung abandon 'old' handsets pretty soon after a new one is released, no operating system patches - leaving users vulnerable to exploits.
They should provide lifetime support - where lifetime means as long as they continue to work - which should be 6-10 years.
That is what I care about - not the number of pixels in the camera.
over intrusive monitoring that invade privacy ... the same bunch that approve of even deeper data sweeps by the likes of NSA/FBI/GCHQ and this data is then available (often without oversight) to the police, local councils, government departments, ... In the UK DRIPA (RIPA predecessor) has been ruled by the High Court & ECJ - RIPA is worse but T May is doing little to roll this back.
It is a shame that Zuck did not have the balls to point this out -I would have given him a big thumbs up for that.
please just employ me at the very reasonable salary of £200,000/year and I promise that I will try my hardest to code something that has a GCHQ only back door.
It is not a lot of money for the government to save us from evil terrorists & drug dealers (do think of the children), but will bolster my pension fund nicely - I only have a few years before retirement.
If we get a good designer who can make the app look pretty then all these nasty people will be seduced into using it rather than some free open source stuff.
Please, pretty please!
how about we then get down with real equality and have full paid paternity for men to be even with women
What happens if a mum wants time off due to a sick/... child: it is usually granted without a fuss. If a dad does the same thing: often there is resistance from managers.
Following divorce: the kids go to mum 90% of the time & dad struggles to see them; mother then complains that her career/pay has suffered as a result. Share the childcare and everyone benefits.
So has this brouhaha finally woken the NHS to the fact that giving patient data to Google is not a clever idea ?
Has Google deleted the data or just said that they have ?
The Norks are rational enough to know that if they nuked the UK or anywhere else then they would be reduced to glowing embers -- look at their recent actions. The summary of this report says as much. They will huff & puff and carry out more missile tests just enough to worry people in other countries.
What they are trying to do is to distract the focus from ''they abused personal information'' to ''how many ?''
This is not too far from how political messages work these days -- sod the facts, produce vague, emotional messages that most listeners will interpret differently as being good for them.
OK: politicians have always done that, it used to be called 'spin'; but these days it seems more deliberate - we are in a 'post truth' era where people believe things despite clear evidence to the contrary.
It might be worth making your browser add a X-T&C header that said something like ''If you misuse my data then you pay me £1,000,000''. It might be hard to make it stick in the courts, but part of the problem is one way T&Cs, you either get to accept it down to the last comma or nothing at all**.
This is part of the Internet 'wild west' that is well overdue regulation; there should be standard T&Cs++ that have been prepared by even handed (consumer/business) lawyers - that people could thus trust.
IETF might even make an official T&C header.
** I admit to being one of the few who I know who does read T&Cs and frequently refuse to accept and thus not use some web site.
++ With schedules to specify things like delivery dates, etc.
Log files should be kept to monitor access, specifying who accessed a system and why, and these should be available to national data protection agencies and the European Data Protection Supervisor on request.
They should also be made available to the individual who's records are being looked at. It is s/he who is really going to take an interest and ask why the ex's brother is looking at their record.
You do not have fixed line Internet; Virgin provides you with a TV connection and chucks in some Internet.
I can see why BT might offer cheaper to non Internet people - the line can be cheaper & the card in the telephone exchange is POTS only (so cheaper), no load on its ATM network, etc. Well if you get Internet via Virgin/who-ever-cable then BT do not need to provide any of the expensive kit either.
The EU has some sanity by explicitly saying it cannot be copyrighted:https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/05/eus-top-court-apis-cant-be-copyrighted-would-monopolise-ideas/
Ooooh - another area of EU/USA courts disagreeing, time to order more popcorn!
I hope that the EU view prevails.
in the past few months they disabled the messaging part from mobile website forcing people to use their Messaging app
Does this not fall under the computer misuse act ? You have not given FB permission to make such a change ... but it does it.
and an UTF document will never be in "plain text" and an UTF document will never be in "plain text"
In a modern environment plain text is UTF-8.
Anyway the distinction being drawn is between a structured binary file (eg .ofd or .docx) and a text file containing some kind of markup (eg: markdown, LaTeX or even troff!) Both have their advantages.
to monitor children than for adults (teachers in this case) to know what the kids in their charge are up to.
What kids need is to trust adults and be confident enough that they will seek guidance Adults should spend time with them, adults should get to know and care for them -- and the kids be aware that they are being cared for. A computer is not a substitute for that.
Also: kids will get up to a little mischief, and have done so for millennia, it is good for them to push boundaries, to explore as they get older. Feel the consequences of going too far. What about the perve from the Internet I hear people say -- that is what you need to build adult/child trust for -- so that the adult will get to know and so react/guide in what is really a relatively rare situation.
Sexting: education as to why it is a bad idea, then support/admonishment when it does happen. Making criminals out of kids for this is over the top.
Bullying: this is not new, on-line bullying is just a development, just as when kids stopped using slates and started using paper in the classroom.
Naughty pictures on the Internet ? A natural curiosity. 'No' is not the answer (& impossible to achieve), but educate the differences between sex & relationships, romance & love. Not new anyway -- in my day it was smuggled copies of Playboy.
All of the above need adults (teachers & parents) to spend time with kids, get to know them.
The trouble with a solicitor driven risk averse society is that kids are not allowed to be kids.
in a few years time, in spite of having done a search to try to determine if he is an honourable character - which draws a blank because he has been 'forgotten'. Can I seek compensation from google/etc or the courts or ... ?
Right to be forgotten should be about personal things (affairs, etc) and for those under 25; not those who have indulged in criminal activity.
.
Anyway: why go after search engines, surely the newspapers, etc, are the right targets ?
Individual government departments each seeking to save a few bob off their own budget; whereas, maybe for a little more, they could 'buy British' - which creates jobs, etc, in the UK that DO pay tax, that DO build up UK expertise, that DOES make them better able to complete internationally, that DOES keep British data within our borders, ...
Overall a few different choices ends up benefiting Britain overall.
But politicians won't do that: each trying to bring their departmental budgets down and, anyway, the benefits of beefing up British business probably won't be noticeable until after the next election -- so they don't give a toss!
other than a few nerds. However at the time the politicos made great hay of it being the Norks - which suits their political ends of portraying Kim Jong-il as being the current root of all evil and a great nuclear threat - not ½ as many words spoken when Putin did the same last week.
I'm not saying that Kim is a nice bloke, but lets start to compare him to Bashar al-Assad, Robert Mugabe, ...
otherwise they will simply refer customers to the manufacturer; which is probably somewhere in China that ignore complaints. This will ensure that resellers will sell stuff that causes them least problems, ie kit that it well designed, tested and is well supported, etc. If a manufacturer cannot provide assurance, etc, they won't get sales - simples.
Also product (support) lifetimes should be reasonable. This does not mean 'until the next model is released', but the real lifetime that one expects. So: for a fridge - maybe 20 years, light switch - 50 years.
Telnetted into various Unix machines, wanted to restart the one in the server room. Whoops - I forgot which machine I was logged into and typed 'reboot' to a machine on the other side of the planet. It did not come up, had to wait until teatime for the guys there to come in and push a button :-(
We all did silly things when we were young and naive...
Agreed
I think there also needs to be a Statute of limitations of articles.
But only in some circumstances; perhaps some combination of:
* Petty crime, eg stealing a car, getting into fights, using (not dealing) drugs, ...
* Under a certain age. I would put this at acts done under 25, 5 years after the act was done. 25 might seem high but a magistrate friend of mine tell me that she saw the same youths time & again, then at 25 they asked for other things 'to be taken into account' - then she would not see them again. It appears to be an age at which many of us finally grow up.
* Maybe acts done under 20 should drop out of sight after 2 years.