Ads make money ...
what incentive is there for google/facebook to do anything real to remove them ?
2650 publicly visible posts • joined 29 May 2007
still has a knighthood. Maybe smooging up to David Cameron helped.
They should have money extracted from them to just above the point where they become a burden on the state. Houses gone, pension gone, shares & savings gone, ...
Why ?
Execs elsewhere will see this and think "oh, shit, maybe I should not do things like this!"
Although I expect that execs elsewhere will see this and put layers of obfuscation between themselves & their deeds to protect their own bacon: probably by pushing the blame on to others.
Most LTS releases for Linux distributions limit to 5 years--from the original release.
But that is not a problem since it is not very hard for the user/owner to upgrade your laptop/... to the next LTS release. The problem is things that cannot be upgraded at all once the vendor has lost interest.
We are in an era where some memes receive a lot of vocal support and it can become damaging to speak out against them. If questioned: not supporting the meme can be held against you - this is why the likes of RedHat pulled away from the FSF.
You see related actions all over: no platforming of speakers, prominent groups (not just political ones) claiming that they are more disadvantaged than others (things are not 0% or 100%), blaming others for events that happened centuries ago, denigration of those who bear resemblance to those who are seen as oppressors,...
The evidence supporting the memes does not need to be good, indeed there can be large cracks or evidence against it - this does not matter, they will be ignored as long as the meme aligns with other popular memes.
This is not to say that some things do not need to change, but there is often an all or nothing attitude that is very harmful: you are either for us or against us. More nuance is needed; more listening less shouting.
Note: I said some memes, not all. I have avoided mentioning which memes as unthinking supporters of some of the more egregious memes would just down-vote my comment.
There used to be a time when contentious issues could be discussed, but now ...
who are doing this sort of thing think might happen to them when they get a bit older ?
Maybe they are the stupid ones who have risen to their level of incompetence.
No really so. One or more unnamed people within IBM fired him. These people should be named by the court and penalised for what they did.
Unless these people (and their managers all the way up to the top) are penalised heavily then this bad behaviour will continue at IBM and elsewhere.
It can't be in the mouse.
It could be in the user's PC - some chunk of software needed, probably MS Windows only.
I suspect that it sends the voice up to Baidu's servers to use its Baidu Brain. So this means that everything that you want speech recognised goes to China. They might well give you some text back but they will keep a copy to give to Chinese spooks.
Anyone who does not live their life 100% in the open should aoid this like the plague. It is a security disaster. But I can see idiot managers blindly ordering these things :-(
But then some twats do share stuff on facebook - so maybe it will sell well!
Can you switch the chatting to Baidu servers off ?
The USPTO wants lots of applications and for them to continue as long as possible as this is what earns them a lot of fees. It does not cost them if the rest of us have huge legal fees because they did not do their job properly.
Not quite as bad as these Guardians ad litems supposedly acting in kids' best interests but in reality feathering their own nests.
Both cases of power without proper accountability.
nasties out there that sit quietly and encrypt away
That is why you keep Monday's backup for a month or few and the backup on the 1st of the month for a year.
Restoring last night's backup should be quick. If you have not noticed these files being corrupted then it does not matter if it takes longer to restore them.
backup drives were also live on the network
Not a problem, it makes it easy for users to restore their own files, I do the same myself. But surely these backup drives are read-only to anything other than the backup server to which only savvy IT people have write access ?
It is not really that hard, neither is it expensive compared to the cost of not being able to work for many days. But people do love making plausible excuses.
It is about implicit requirements. Were the participants given a functional specification ? Would it have been OK to remove all of the bricks, move the man and put the roof on the floor ?
As any barrister knows you greatly influence the answer that you get by the way that you ask the question.
I would be very surprised if this did not happen. It is an obvious tactic and the cops are not that stupid.
I was wondering what they do with 28 tons of cocaine ? It is not a small bag that can be tossed into a bin and forgotten about. Burning it would have interesting effects on anyone down wind of the incinerator.
Maybe insist that the info is required on sign up and be made available to the cops; but that it be stored in a way that is unusable to facebook, etc, is so that they cannot use it for advertising, etc.
OK: this would be easy to do technically, however I would expect facebook to say "yes it is in a black box" and the promptly use the data anyway.
I have seen such printouts many times while waiting for the hotel staff to return to their desk.
I saw such a pile when checking in to a hotel in Eastbourne a few years ago, I complained to the manager who said that he would do something about it (no idea if he did).
I complained to Nat West credit card services. They were less than interested. In my experience banks talk much more about security than they actually do.
Going to law is expensive. They are unlikely to win (see what happened last time), but they might unsettle some who will buy other products.
So: where is the money coming from ? Who stands to gain by companies avoiding Linux ?
PS: anyone know where Pamela is these days ?
Maybe these digital businesses should campaign to get tax relief where they are already, supposedly, taxed.
I suspect the USA government will next threaten 25% tax on imports from Vietnam.
some satellites in geosynchronous orbits
To be in a geosynchronous orbit a satellite must be 22,236 miles up, if not it will not stay in the same apparent place above the earth. So how can it be closer than some and not others ?
to an address in Dewsbury - I have never lived there, I live some 200 miles away. I only found out when I asked for a subject access request (data protection act). They refused to refund me as it was more than 6 years ago and claimed that, somehow, I should have known about it.
If you deal with them only do so in writing; what they record on their computer is not always what is said on the 'phone.
Given how much intelligence we can pack into a printer why does any OS need to do anything other than say 'here's the data, get on with it'?
It means that the printer manufacturer can save $1 in making it and offload the hard work to a computer that has to have vast resources just to be able to run Microsoft Windows.
They need to build them cheaply in case they do not make their money back if the user does not buy their over priced ink.
This is collecting personal data. I thought that the data-protection-act/GDPR said that what data is being collected, and why, had to be clear and easy to understand -- so why vagueness ?
I do understand that I cannot opt out of this government data scrape, but I should know what is happening.
it is about ensuring that what gets printed is not significantly biased in any direction
I do not mind bias in op-ed pieces as long as it is clearly marked as opinion of the author. This can lead to interesting debate, we need to be wary of no platforming unpopular views.
There is no place for bias in, supposedly, straight reporting of facts in news. But it is really hard to police as the choice of words can completely colour descriptions: one man's "freedom fighter" is another's "terrorist".
(Apologies to W Shakespeare)
I think that part of the purpose is to evade the cookie laws in the EU, California & other places.
So: back to normal for a few years while Google tracks everyone. It will take legislators many years to catch up ... I suspect that Google has draft a FLoC replacement for then.
because most of them would not know about it. Chrome will come with it enabled by default, you might be able to switch it off, but most would not know how to and probably not understand why they might be at disadvantage by being tracked.
Installing "yes" men that make a mockery of an electoral system.
This time is was Kaseya being arse holes, next time it could be some malfunction, either way Kayeya are unlikely to worry much. How much work would you do for $48/year ?
The only way of being safe is to take your own backup, preferably two that you keep in different locations.
Yes: it is harder, more work, needs thought - but how much is your data worth to you ?