Re: Ms just does not know when to stop fiddling
If it ain't bust don't fix it.
A good design philosophy -- but as a developer I do understand the temptation to fiddle.
2644 publicly visible posts • joined 29 May 2007
There should be a set of model contracts that are clearly written and fair to both customer and retailer/business. These would come with a logo like the BSI Kitemark.
Different contracts as there are different sorts of business.
The contracts would come with a schedule where the business could put things like: delivery times & charges; URLs; geographic restrictions.
One thing forbidden would be any change without further customer agreement - except, maybe, stuff in the schedule.
That often seems to mean "getting rid of pesky red tape" while glossing over why the red tape was there in the first place.
Red tape is often brought in after something bad has happened to prevent reoccurrence ... then, decades later, it is denounced as slowing business. But all those who were alive when the original bad thing happened are dead, so the red tape is removed and a few years later history repeats itself when bad thing happens again.
Not a lot(I am an individual), but I figure that several £20 by many will add up.
I encourage my customers to also give £20 to what they depend on - but I doubt that many do, in spite of spending a lot on the proprietary software that they use. They cannot see that giving little amounts will long term help what is vital to them - just expect others to pay. It is like climate change where everyone seems to expect everyone else to act to prevent a cataclysmic future.
I also release some of what I do as open source.
PETs and other fine sounding words that will have no real meaning. You can have all the tech that you want - but unless there are strong laws that prevent the abuse of personal data then companies & governments will do as they wish.
The sort of thing to start with: if a USA company goes bust then the personal data that it has will be sold to the highest bidder regardless of what the company promised when the data was acquired.
But I expect the UK government to not put in any real effort and will allow our privacy to be abused.
It is possible to generate electricity in a relatively carbon free way.
Gas: the carbon is in the product.
Electricity price per kWh is about 3 times that of gas -- it should be the other way round to encourage people to change.
I know that many will downvote me for saying this, but we must move away from gas as part of our climate change efforts.
what then ? End users have kit that is vulnerable. OK: the importers are liable, what can they do ? The source code for these things will prolly not be in escrow so they cannot be patched, even if it was and if (big if) it is possible to patch & build a working image from the code - how do they get it on to end users' kit ? These things are often set up to get patches from the makers' machines - which are not longer there.
Should the importers be made to buy the kit back ? Even if this happens many end users will not want to due to the hassle involved.
This needs much more thought.
but I trust some less than others.
China is near the bottom of trustability IMHO. Look at what is happening to that lady tennis player, I suspect that she has been told that her friends/relations will get harmed if she does not say that she is not under pressure. Her social media accounts are still dead, what we hear from her seems stage managed.
This is sensible as it then does not matter what is on the desktop as long as the web browser is reasonably modern. Most business applications are, essentially, form filling - interactivity can be done with Javascript.
Harder applications are graphical ones as they can need a lot of bandwidth and low latency. Word processors are common graphical applications, so the use of Libreoffice, being run locally, is sensible.
They will prob not reach 100% as a few programs will only be available on Windows or macOS - but a few do not matter.
if you work in an office that has many people - the meeting room stops you disturbing the others in the office.
As a result of lock-down many work from home: one person offices, so meeting rooms are not as useful.
As for cameras: almost all of the people in my jitsi meetings switch them off soon after joining the meeting.
Just what I was about to say.
The big problem will be getting it to stick. Google will just ignore informal claims that people make. Taking it to the small claims court might work but Google know that most people will just give up as it is a lot of bother for not a lot of money.
The best thing that people can do is to talk loudly on facebook/... about the problems.
is not something that can be done as it just makes them absorb more sunlight and so over-heat.
What about using the same flat panels, etc, as used on stealth aircraft to reduce reflections and so visibility ?
Many of us are prone to that eg: there are things that we all can do to help with climate change we might say that some are good, but how many do we really do ? I am not better than most.
Having said that: Google is evil.
That was only 18 months ago ... OK: the kit was probably not new then.
If the employee is doing the same job then why should their PC/laptop need to be replaced with something more powerful ?
My PC is 9 years old and my laptop 5 years old, both still run well. One runs Debian the other Linux Mint.
How many of the drivers will have had to borrow as they did not earn as much ?
The interest rate should be, at least, a borrowing rate not a deposit rate.
Why not use the UK statutory rate of interest which is 8% plus the Bank of England Base Rate.
A company can boost its profits by selling more stuff if it makes life-cycles short. The environment is not its problem. Profits are for today, environmental problems are in the future. Even if a company does the right thing it will probably find that its competitors will not.
Much like what will happen at COP26. Politicians want benefits in the current electoral cycle, climate problems are in the future. Even if a country does the right thing it will probably find that other countries will not.
before his company started selling this to schools. If CRB Cunninghams racks up a huge loss because this is not put into schools then the blame should be put to him.
It would be interesting to see the letter that "97 per cent of parents, carers and children had consented to the use of facial scanning". My experience with schools is that such letters are often phrased as edicts, done deals, that you must agree to else your kid will not, in this case, get lunch. Often: having to agree with whatever nonsense the school comes up with is part of the parental agreement that got your kid into school in the first place.
Too many of these contracts are, deliberately, unreadable or obscure. The result is that people agree to things that they do not understand.
We need a set of model contracts that companies can elect to use. These can be kite-marked or similar. We will then ask why they do not use a model contract.
They need to be different ? It will only need a few model contracts to cover pizza delivery to anti-virus; each will have a short schedule that details: prices, delivery prices/times, & similar.
To this guy the cost of his data being abused is a small one compared to the potential benefit of a treatment being found that saves his life.
To someone who illegally re-identifies his data which is then sold there is money to be made but there is little cost if this act is found; maybe at worse a fine for his corporation. If there were large personal fines then someone who re-identifies data might not do this. Part of the problem is that most re-identification is hidden behind corporate doors.
If you've not read it, "Ten Arguments For Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now" by Jaron Lanier is worth a read.
Here is a summary of what he says.