Re: There should be a big label
in low-contrast print
That just shows you what a shitty company they are. Trying to create a legal defence for themselves while ensuring that, in practice, many customers will not notice.
2623 publicly visible posts • joined 29 May 2007
In the EU (& UK) there is an anti-dumping law, "It protects against damage to UK industry caused by the dumping of goods in the UK at prices much lower than the normal value." The definition of "normal value" includes page 3, point (4) in second column:
(4) By constructing a normal value based on the costs of production plus a reasonable amount to cover selling, general and administrative costs and profit
It seems to me that HP is in breach of this.
Why are they not taken to court ?
But all of this will be ignored by the muppets in power.
If I really needed an illustration: Ferguson shipyard misses out on new CalMac ferry order
Many advantages:
• Keep money in the UK, not export it to the USA
• Build up skills and infrastructure in the UK
• Grow UK service companies, make them better able to compete overseas
• Better security - when data goes overseas who gets access to it ?
But all of this will be ignored by the muppets in power.
Of course, once SAP [of anyone else] have control of your data, they will take every opportunity to enrich themselves.
This is much the same what Microsoft is doing by sucking all of your documents into its O365 cloud - it will progressively make it more expensive, and harder, to do anything else.
although my attempts to train ChatGPT to answer everybody only in iambic pentameter are moving very slowly.
I would be even more impressed if you could persuade it to reply in Haiku.
Not quite as useless as you think as it would make a reply that is short enough to be taken in by everyone, especially those with a tiny attention span.
I am happy for them to do that by selling me a printer at a price that does that.
When I need a new printer I look ink vendors' web sites and work out the printing price per page and chose on that basis. I do not care who makes the ink/toner.
I would be very happy to buy printer manufacturer supplies as long as they are competitive.
Summary: I am happy for the manufacturer to make a profit but not a killing.
that each off-planet mission will, somehow, attempt to image Trump's ego from space. He will readily approve all of them.
However: given the size of his ego it will not be hard to find, I just hope that it will not crack some of the expensive optics.
Compare that to something like an HP stream from Argos at £249 (they do other cheaper stuff).
Most people do simple things and do not need hefty machines. I want a cheap laptop when away from home, where I have a more powerful desktop.
• It is cheaper to build
• Make more profit by forcing customers into expensive repairs
• Make another sale when the customer does not want to pay for an expensive repair
• Can make something smaller by not worrying about repairability
• CEO is a Trump supporter
Anything else ?
What do you think ?
(some of who I have worked in) who depend on Open Source components and then complain about bugs or missing features. I have suggested that they pay for the bug fix or enhancement to be met with derision "who do I think they are - to pay for something that could benefit their competitors ?", or similar sentiments.
Sometimes I fave fixed a bug while being paid for them and with their approval. "Now let me send in a patch" to be told "not on our time" - so I do it when I get home.
They just do not understand that we can all move forward faster if we cooperate, payment of trivial sums (compared to what they waste elsewhere) is an anathema to some of them.
I would much rather that BoE (or any organ of state) paid for services within our shores:
• generate employment here - which will be taxable
• use skills of people here which will:
•• encourage more Brits to become skilled up
•• enable us to better compete for such projects internationally
• keep sensitive data within the UK
Unfortunately: this requires joined up thinking - which is in short supply.
So it is 'opt out' not 'opt in'. So is this not a form of Unsolicited Goods and illegal under the Inertia Selling rules ?
I do understand that if you have something that works it might be thought preferable to bleed a little rather than face death if a migration goes wrong - especially for systems where downtime is very costly.
But if a something new is being developed breakages are not so important, indeed expected, before it goes live. So escape from VMware should be much easier -- reskilling being a major cost, maybe also different hardware.
I wonder how many new projects are being built on top of VMware just because of fear of the unknown ?
I've used Mint Cinnamon for over a decade
Let me put in a plug for Mint with the Mate desktop; Mate is, essentially, GNOME 2 as the GNOME project went off the rails with GNOME 3.
Mint is what I run on my laptop, at home my desktop runs Debian with the Mate desktop. Mint gets much of its packages from Debian - not that an end user needs to worry about that.
I have never had a FB/... account and do not use their services. However they have a "shadow account" that contains my personal information, they store this outside of the UK & EU, I have not agreed to them having my information, them taking it outside the UK, they have not told me what they are using it for.
Either:
• Meta should seek consent before they use my information -- clearly documented in the GDPR, or:
• Meta can pay me £1,000 per year to keep this shadow information. To be paid into my bank a/c not as credit to some service that I do not use.
without it organisations will do the minimum, especially if the cost of failure is borne by others - especially if those others are too small to be able to fight back.
Regulation has a cost but it also has benefits.
Too much regulation is bad, too little is bad. There is a balance, but finding it is hard and might only be obvious in retrospect.
Trump and Musk. Let them take risks rather than letting others do so on their behalf.
Them leaving would also make this planet a much safer place for the rest of us. It is a shame that we will need to wait until the end of next year for the launch window.
According to DVLA there were 32,888,476 cars in the UK in Q2 2024 (warning: spreadsheet) so 300,000 charge-points is about 1%, assuming that they are all working and near to where EVs need to be charged.
(40,448,909 vehicles in total, including buses & lorries)
Like anyone would give their true ID to a porn site that could then track all their "views" !That's ripe for hackers and blackmailers.
They appear to be doing it already - only yesterday I received an email from someone who claimed that they had control of my Windows PC and had seen the porn sites that I was visiting. They would inform my wife, etc, unless I paid them 10 bitcoin.
I thought that I had better pay up until I remembered that my PC runs Debian and that I am not married!
In 2023 there were stories of Twitter not paying rent and being sued. How was this resolved, did Musk get away with non payment ?
Is this the sort of person who we want in the government of the USA ? Oh, look at the new president - he will fit right in!
I am on the local community group committee. We report pot holes to the Hertfordshire county councillor who just tells us that it is policy to not fill/repair them until they are big enough:
"Overall for HCC potholes it’s 5cm in depth and 30cm in width – at the higher end as per the article sent through, and of footways for trip hazards its 2cm."
So: how is AI going to improve that ?
Will the debris be less damaging/polluting than when a metal framed satellite it hit - thus reducing impact of Kessler syndrome ?
I suppose that the contents will still contain much metal, so the box/contents ratio might be important.
So: the experts have been proven right -- what a surprise. But I doubt that the politicians will learn and start listening to experts in other fields. One set of experts that I would like them to listen to are the climate scientists, some do, most pretend to.
The USA is about to get a dictator who will shut own and ignore all experts that say inconvenient things.
Not living in the USA I am more worried about what happens at home (UK) than in the other side of the pond.
The USA is a large economy and provides a lot of tech and buys a lot of our goods -- but not all of them by a long way.
Trump will try to tie other countries up with individual trade deals, do not do what he says and he will yank the trade deal away.
If the rest of the world unites we can force Trump to behave to everyone's benefit rather than what Trump thinks is best for him personally (and the USA secondly).
Nice in theory but getting countries to act together is very hard. A few will be seduced by Trump offering trinkets - this will seem good in the short term until Trump changes it when escaping his clutches will be hard. Forward thinking is needed - something that our politician are not known for
what did the US do to be saddled with the likes of Trump, Musk and co?
It is what they did not do: not listen to the what Trump was saying and think it through; not understand that Trump's low morals, lying, made up facts are not what is needed for a good president; not look at the reprobates that Trump surrounded himself with; ...
Do ? Listening to Fox news is a good start.
Look at the data collection policies of a lot of sites and they include the right to 'fingerprint' you and track you 'across various devices'
My point is that they should only be able to follow those policies once a user has agreed to them, just viewing a web page is not enough.