* Posts by Blitterbug

558 publicly visible posts • joined 27 Apr 2010

Page:

Half of phish marks respond to scams within one 'golden hour'

Blitterbug
FAIL

Trusteer Crapport

The latter part of this article read like an advert for this utter crapware. As an independent IT consultant I regularly service hundreds of PCs, and when a person reports broken or sluggish browsing, this is the first thing I now look for following the usual malware (well, I class this as malware these days). In all cases where browsing was still broken or horribly slow, after malware removal, ripping out this rubbish fixes the problem.

The scary thing is, after looking into this company and its products and methods from a position of complete ignorance a couple of years ago, I now believe the entire banking industry is moving inexorably toward mandatory takeup of this failtastic application. Indeed, I have one client whose banker, name withheld, threatened to remove banking services following an ID theft incident where several thousand pounds were siphoned from his account, unless he installed Crapport.

Just reading the outrageous claims for this product is a revelation. Did you know that even a machine riddled with malware is 100% safe to perform online banking with, as long as you have TR installed? I kid you not. And apparently the secure tunnel it provides between client PC and bank is as rugged as the Rock of Gibralter! Except that without much skill in advanced hacking I am easily able to knock out the core TR engine with a simple script (does need a reboot after to complete the process but that will happen the next time the hapless owner switches their machine off).

Be afraid, very afraid.

Netbooks: notebook evolved - or stunted throwback?

Blitterbug
Happy

It's not about Win vs Linux

This shouldn't be about Win vs Linux; the same arguments are true regardless of base hardware. Yes, netbooks are quicker (as are all PCs) running *nix variants. We all know this. We should be comparing the netbook spec against 'full-blown' laptops and deciding whether it is a 'dead end', as per the thrust of the article.

In my experience, most of the early linux netbooks were returned cos the punters simply wanted what they knew - eg Windows - so the manufacturers responded to simple market forces & went to MS to see if there was a suitable OS available, and we all know the rest; Vista was too bloated so XP was de-mothballed until Win7 was ready. MS mandated a lowish res in return for very low license costs of around £25 - £30 per unit.

None of this means Win = any better or worse than it was in the first place. It's about whether this form factor has any relevance, whatever the OS - and of course you can still install Ubuntu or whatever you want on your shiny new Win7 netbook if you choose. The Win license is around £30 of the total £250 cost, so not a huge waste for the wonderful hardware feature set you get.

Blitterbug
Happy

Actually only the display is limited

@ Graham B:- You can easily swap out the 1GB DIMM for 2GB. MS only mandated the vertical res @ 600 to keep the license (Windows tax, if you prefer) much lower.

It seems to me that many peeps here can't have tried a real, actual Win netbook. Fair play to those that have and still find it slow, but the Atom architecture is fast, it's not knobbled. Even at 1.6GHz my Aspire One absolutely *slays* my older Vista Home Basic laptop (Celeron @ 2GHz) and *all* my older Pentium M laptops that run @ faster clocks.

Truthfully, if you hate Win and/or MS, you will be commenting negatively here about Netbooks to some degree or other, even if it's just to have a quick pop @ MS. But that aside, people seem to be forgetting that the Atom uses much of the core2 architecture and if the screen res is allowed to grow a little (already has in some models), and if netbook makers keep their nerve and keep making them, they *are* the perfect small-footprint workhorse they were supposed to be.

Guys, kick out all the crap that is killing your Win netbooks and they will fly! Using virtual DVD software I have even mounted copies of my Civ IV and Rome Total War games, and they actually play quite nicely. Has no-one realised the integrated graphics on these things is actually pretty damned good??

Blitterbug
Happy

Tweaked, they're fine!

The base netbook spec is absolutely fine. What isn't fine, on the many I have installed for my clients, is the pre-loaded crap that Acer, Dell & even Samsung chuck on top of Windows. This stuff KILLS netbooks. Heck, I spend an average of 90 mins tweaking brand-new fast laptops before I consider them usable, including killing Norton, dumping the OEM automatic healthcheck crap services and shutting off rubbish services such as Tablet PC, Server, etc.

I promise you; spend the same time on an XP or Win7 netbook as you would commissioning a fast laptop & you will be very pleasantly surprised; mine goes with me everywhere and lasts a working day on a single charge, allows me to fault-test routers & WiFi setups, I can plug it into an external monitor for hi-res work if I want, and being Acer it has a beautiful 'proper' keyboard, not a bunch of scrabble tiles!

Check Point defends ZoneAlarm scareware-style warning

Blitterbug
FAIL

Unbelievable

I run a small business as a local 'PC Doctor', and 90% of viruses I deal with on a weekly basis are scareware. This so-called 'promotion' uses *word-for-word' the text from any scareware variant you care to name, whether XP Antivirus, Antivirus Live or SecurityTool.

In my opinion, although the product is not itself a virus, many people will believe they are infected and will pay the money. Effectively, cash has been extorted using fear as leverage. How exactly does this differ from the scareware 'business model'??? Wankers.

Zuck buffs image ahead of Facebook movie

Blitterbug
Alien

High on the autism spectrum?

I recall a study of MS employees a few years back that indicated the average Microsoftie placed somewhere on the autism scale. At the very least, Aspergers Syndrome was often indicated. The conclusion, inevitably, was that IT tends to attract the 'socially awkward' inward-looking types who often have issues empathising with others. A sweeping generalisation, undoubtedly, but is it possible that Mr Z can blame some of his 'issues' on a touch of Aspergers..? Just a thought.

I speak incidentally as an IT guy myself, who also could be said to fit this 'profile' in many ways.

Google slaps malware warning on Radio 3 website

Blitterbug

I agree with Conrad

... but not having a US proxy to test it on, I can't tell, but it seems likely, and explains why UK-based tests fail to spot anything wrong. But why would the BBC carry advertising in any event, even for overseas visitors?

McAfee offers cash for clunkers

Blitterbug

Bloatware indeed

As an independent contractor, I recommend all my clients remove this rubbish immediately before we undertake work on their system(s). Norton, too. In my experience, over 90% of serious computer slowdowns are cured in this manner with *no* further major intervention required.

It's apparent to anyone with a background in software engineering how fundamentally broken these packages are and it disgusts me that the major PC and laptop manufacturers have such a cosy cartel going with the 'big two' AV vendors. Most of our clients simply don't believe their problems are mostly caused by their own (paid for) system protection. They often say, 'but this software is advertised on TV - why would PC World promote something that's bad for my computer?'

Hmmmm.......

Page: