Re: Who was responsible
Direct Line gives a 5% discount for Tesla cars that have Autopilot, which I guess they based on empirical evidence.
1644 publicly visible posts • joined 27 May 2007
"Just go look at the Tesla forums and you will see the vitriol that is spouted when anyone dares to criticise something (such as rust) on their Tesla."
Product fanbois brutally mob product critic in online product forum shock
From my experience, postings on product forums are people complaining that the product or customer service is useless, fanbois saying that the product and company are wonderful and other people asking a question asked every two weeks, the answer to which is in the product manual.
"... disabling the vehicle by moving to the side of the road when the user has stopped monitoring the AI."
The system does do this - but after warning the driver a few times. The gap between warnings is based on distance travelled.
One problem has been that of stupid drivers using devices designed to defeat the detection of the driver holding the steering wheel, so that they can play video games, watch films or do other things that they have been told they should not do when driving.
"About 2 minutes in he's talking about the various options on the car and says something like "...or pay an extra $7,000 for the full self-driving capability"."
FSD is an option which provides some features to Tesla cars now but promises to provide "Full Self Driving" at some future but as yet unknown date. Buying the option would cover any software or hardware upgrades needed to achieve FSD, if it ever becomes reality. But a fair proportion of Tesla owners consider FSD to be a unicorn that will never be seen.
"All Teslas required large oil burning machines to pull the various battery metals out of the ground and ship it to the processing plant & then on to the factories. It can take a very long time for an electric car to become more 'green' overall than a petrol/diesel motor, (German Teslas run on about 30% coal & lignite)."
UCUSA reckon it takes from 6 to 16 months of driving for an EV to have offset the increased impact of it's manufacture, compared with an ICE vehicle.
https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/cleaner-cars-cradle-grave
IANAL bit it seems extremely dodgy for a service provider (with whom you have a contract) to demand that you agree to having your personal data handed to some third party (with whom you have no contract,no legal relationship and no contact). It sounds like the sort of thing that should not happen by default and not without a customer's explicit permission.
The car was owned by Tesla - it had not been sold or owned by anyone else, so it was not sold to someone, with a defined set of options. Maybe it was a demonstrator (hence all the options being enabled).
Tesla sold the car via an auction company to a third party dealer. The third party dealer sold the car (advertised with autopilot, etc,) to some guy. Tesla subsequently decided that the car should not have autopilot and disabled it. If Tesla sold that car at auction as not having autopilot, then I guess the third party dealer may have to pay up - but if Tesla sold the car to the third party dealer as having autopilot, they should probably reinstate autopilot and send the new owner some goodies as an apology.
"If the new owner bought a new Tesla could he transfer his licence to the new car? If he's not allowed to then is the licence for the car, for the owner or a car/owner combination?"
All the software options stay with the car, not the owner. One of the tricky issues is where an owner has paid for a future update, which was never delivered, because it was not yet available -- and his car is then written off. The Tesla rules say that he or his insurers would have to buy the undelivered software option again for any replacement car.
"And what exactly are the traditional methods, waiting for somebody to phone about it ?"
My local council has a page on their website for reporting potholes. They have notes on how to report and you can even upload a photo.
It works: On a road I regularly use, a utility company had dug a hole, not made a good job of filling it and a pothole had developed as lorries drive over it. The council had repaired it within a few weeks of my report - and they addressed some other issues on the same road.
We should have a change in the law that requires utilities and others who dig up the roads to be made to fix their own errors or at least, pay for their errors to be fixed, instead of leaving it to local councils.
One could record the GPS track, WiFI SSIDs and MAC addresses, when moving along a certain route. Then play the data back in multiple VMs, with the GPS and WiFi interfaces spoofed. You could run the simulated route just before heading home, to help reduce traffic on your favourite route.
Whilst several traditional automotive manufacturers have entered the EV market, their offerings (with the exception of Hyundai and Kia) seem to have a problem matching the range and efficiency of Tesla cars - even those that cost more. It seems that, in their years of manufacturing EV batteries and battery management systems, Tesla has some secret sauce that others have yet to discover.
Then there's charging: Tesla has a global network of DC chargers, which are free at the point of use and easy to use - which makes long journeys viable and straightforward in a Tesla. While a number of manufacturers are involved with Ionity's rollout of DC chargers, they are years behind.
Significant competition for Tesla may come from Chinese EV manufacturers, some of whom have been quietly selling EVs in large numbers in China and elsewhere.
It might also be worth remembering that Three and Vodafone started offering free roaming in various countries (some EU countries, some non-EU countries) some years before the related EU directive was conceived. I think Three currently has free roaming in 70 countries, so most of these are not in the EU and therefore, are not free because of the EU directive.
"Whilst some of the Bitcoin was transferred into 'fiat currency' as it is known, a substantial proportion of the Bitcoin, namely, 96 Bitcoins, were transferred to a specified address."
Entities who facilitate "cashing out" are normally required to have records (e.g. copies of passports, etc.) unless they want to fall foul of the authorities where they operate.
The production, storage and distribution of hydrogen is incredibly energy intensive (as it is for petrol and diesel). This makes for very low "well-to-wheel" efficiency. If, as you suggest, local electrolysis could be used instead, that might change but safety concerns remain. However, BEVs and static battery energy storage seem to be winning, mainly because the Chinese have chosen this route.
A substantial part of the reasoning for a digital tax in the UK has to do with the manner in which a number of multinationals exploit single market rules e.g. goods or services sold in the UK are invoiced from Ireland or Luxembourg, avoiding UK taxes. Once we leave the EU, that particular ruse will no longer be possible and the same businesses will be forced to invoice in the UK, with UK VAT, etc.
The UK's consumer laws are probably the best in the EU, with a 6 year legal warranty (5 years in Scotland). It is in stark contrast to "Servicewüste Deutschland". One of my German colleagues returned a two month old notebook DVD drive under warranty and the shop had it "in repair" for nine months. When Walmart Germany offered a 30 day no quibble return, a group representing other German stores successfully sued Walmart for unfair competition, requiring them to pay compensation and stick to the legal requirement of 14 days.
My understanding is that some errors were individual transactions being logged as multiple transactions on the central database (following a connectivity break). Others were apparently phantom transactions (possibly allocated from a different post office or even fraudulent activities of people running the central database), appearing in the central database after the post office concerned had finished for the day and completed their sign off from Horizon.
It it possible to hire people as temporary workers, via an agency, which is then responsible for all the PAYE, etc. Client companies typically like to have a limited company between themselves and any temporary workers/contractors and will avoid hiring them directly. In IT and other fields, many contractors have chosen to provide the limited company isolation themselves, because of the tax benefits.
One potential downside for the government in pushing contractors from PSCs to agency work is that temporary workers can sign on as unemployed (to get their mortgage paid) after the end of every contract, which can't happen with contractors running PSCs.
I have had a few contracts where I was there longer than some of the so-called permanent staff. Just because an individual is salaried and has an employment contract, it doesn't mean they are any more loyal than a contractor.
Currently, I have been subcontracted for the same end client for ten years - albeit, in different divisions and countries and via different prime contractors.
"Not sure it was the computer system who made the decision to prosecute.
That would have been the CPS based on information provided by the Post Office and the police."
The Post Office have brought all these prosecutions themselves, without involving the CPS at any point. They inform the police that fraud has been committed and seize the post office concerned. They hold all the evidence, as their terms dictate that sub postmasters may not not secondary accounting systems. When they commissioned independent auditors to assess Horizon, they then tried to quash the report when they found out that it listed numerous failings. The whole thing is a complete travesty. The settlement is not nearly enough. At least one sub-postmaster committed suicide over the false accusations and seizure of his business.
"Possibly its when they find out their backups havent been working for months as the person who changed the tapes was outsourced."
In the case of backup run at a manufacturing site of a very large pharmaceutical, operations were switched to office hours only and the cleaner was apparently supposed to swap tapes in the backup device. The operator had failed to check and change the tapes during the day, so the cleaner had been swapping the same two tapes for months, overwriting all the previous backups. A whole load of really important data was lost after a disk failure, so the company sacked the cleaner.
The last time the Russians hacked the doping agencies, we learnt that one vocal opponent of drug use had been caught by more than one random drugs test but was then been awarded a number of retrospective TUEs. That is driving a coach and horses through the rules and blatant hypocrisy from the tennis player in question. And why is it, that when an athlete has some medical condition, all of the oral remedies given to the rest of us are apparently unsuitable and athletes are obliged to have injections, which have the greatest beneficial impact on their performance?
Also from the last Russian hack, we learnt that all members of the Norwegian cross country skiing team were apparently chronic asthmatics.
While the Russian hacking and Russian doping are bad, so is all this other "legalised doping". The whole thing should be done in the open.
The difference is that Tesla owners can turn off the telemetry sent to Tesla but Microsoft's customers cannot. Microsoft has a number of options to reduce the telemetry being sent (presumably intended to give users a false impression that their privacy has been respected) but other telemetry is still collected and can only be blocked using third party software.
Yes - when I bought inkjet printers, I wasn't using them often enough to stop the ink drying up and blocking the print heads. I had a secondhand HP laser printer for about 10 years but have had a Xerox MFP for about 5 years now. As long as the printer prints, there isn't any point in changing it - I don't need any more resolution, speed or new functions.
"....and if they come home, they aren't covered either."
Entitlement to free non-emergency NHS treatment is for all legal residents of the UK - any returning ex-pat would be entitled to free routine NHS care as soon as they establish residency e.g. register for council tax and inform HMRC and DWP of their return and UK address.
"Imagine the gloomy Brit workforce in the EU who haven't got a scooby doo what their future is going to be, because their residency, work, health, and pension rights are reciprocal to what gets dished out to EU citizens in the UK and are entirely dependent on the entitled schoolchild and his special psychopathic friend dream up today."
EU citizens resident in the UK before Brexit is implemented (currently, 31st October)are entitled to stay in the UK, even if they have not already qualified for permanent residence. This was announced under May's tenure. Many EU citizens have already established their situation but as usual, the Home Office is managing to screw up the fairly simple rules.
The EC/EU27 have not reciprocated, which is why many British citizens living on the continent don't know what will happen. However, some EU27 countries, like Germany, have announced something similar to the UK.
Given that the people most likely to have a .eu domain are likely to be supportive of the EU, the EC's action in respect of these domains seem a bit of a shot in the foot.
About the government position/statements about the Benn law: The law requires the government to send a letter to the EC, requesting a Brexit extension - it does not require them to achieve a Brexit extension.