This Is Good News
However, AI's persistent failures to ignore clear directions, producing unhelpful results for which no refund is possible (and time is lost) are a very heavy counterweight to the good news.
201 publicly visible posts • joined 9 Apr 2010
No, I did not get that far. I have relearned the need to follow every link before commenting on an article. My sincere apologies for assuming from the article proper no testing had been attempted. I am very very glad to hear it was and has been successful--that is huge!
> Short circuiting that journey with AI tools makes folks for whom the journey is the reward feel cheated.
So it seems there are a few of us here seeking knowledge and understanding first before we seek to seriously change things. I'm holding off on orchestration as I keep catching up starting in January after my exploration of ChatGPT in 2023 underwhelmed me. This week it feels like the technology is changing faster than I can catch up and the government has taken away my best tool for learning for the time being! Beware of those unintended consequences.
Why can't the industry standardize on paging for (typically) 4096-byte virtual memory pages moving in and out of real RAM (main storage in mainframes) while swapping is for process spaces to be rendered non-dispatchable with no in-flight I/O to be swapped out? The article would have been so much easier to read if the usage had been defined up front. Maybe we need new terms for swapping and paging to arise that adhere to these distinctions and end the confusion.
"This material has been created by AI and may be partially or entirely untrue and cannot be safely relied on."
as opposed to
"This material has been created by human being(s) and may be partially or entirely untrue and cannot be safely relied on."
Maybe I'm missing something.
Humanity uses appropriately vetted AI to publicly analyze proposed legislation before it is turned into actual law, serving as a check on the more egregious bills coming forth. Then we can hear the legislators' reasoning for agreeing or disagreeing with the AI reasoning (and the AI rebuttals of their opinions). That could sell a lot of popcorn. If that works out well, then start letting it publicly analyze existing law to come up with recommendations for tweaking or outright repeal by the responsible legislatures.
Actually, it was a parody developed in the '80s for singing (and eventually buffalo stomping by leaders) during the Thursday night session of the IBM mainframe user group SHARE. However, the chorus was "we all run in a virtual machine..." and the only VMs available ran on the IBM S/370 family of computers. See https://techchannel.com/performance/seeing-the-world-via-the-mainframe/ for corroboration.
This is, of course, the real concern, and the outcome may not be as certain as the comment presents. The personality of the new Number One must be as respectable to the team as Linus himself. If that person cannot quickly earn such respect, IT will be in a serious situation, one that AI cannot solve at this time and probably at that time.
I, too, was alive, as was my oldest brother who had graduated the year before and was visiting the week before (had a significant conversation with the ROTC student who was killed). What of it? The only real question is was any legal precedent established in the following investigation and legal proceedings that may have relevance today.
RTFM is almost as old as computers themselves, and it applies to technologies older than computers, even if the acronym wasn't commonly used then. In the 21st Century it boggles the mind how few people RTFM _before_ they use some technical widget, despite the serious harm that approach can cause themselves and others. Somehow "human nature" falls short as an explanation. Does anyone know of any credible studies regarding this phenomenon?
Of course, with too many apps devoid of a manual (I'm looking at you, smartphones), the users cannot be blamed.
That was a quotation from the popular song "Wonderful World" by Sam Cooke [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wonderful_World_(Sam_Cooke_song)], not a statement regarding my educational achievements nor was it intended as a question seeking an answer. Oh, and the SR-71 design employed heavy slipstick support back in the day, so I guess it was faster than referencing log tables.