sounds fishy
"the majority of the funds raised would be used to buy back shares from investors"
Isn't this the way pyramid schemes begin... pay off early investors with the money from late investors, rinse, repeat...
I'd avoid this if I were me...
Posts by Xerxes
9 publicly visible posts • joined 22 Mar 2010
Groupon drops $500m in piggy bank, eyes world hungrily
Diary of an Overflow Addict
Court slaps down coppers in photography case
Future quantum computers could be made of... silicon?
Thursday 24th June 2010 23:03 GMT
I think you meant...
... Felis catus (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Taxonomy/Browser/wwwtax.cgi?id=9685) rather than F. domesticus.
Johann Christian Polycarp Erxleben used the name F domesticus. This name, and F silvestris domesticus, are sometimes seen, but are not considered valid scientific names under the rules of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. F silvestris is generally adopted for the wild species and F catus is sometimes seen in print for the domestic cat.
* http://www.messybeast.com/breed-subspecies.htm
Cheers!
X!
Far East fanboi dresses iPad as Mac (Classic)
Terence Conran slams 'appalling' Olympic mascots
Copernicus reburied with full Catholic honours
Aussie smoko-proofing drug prevents ill effects of cigs
Monday 22nd March 2010 18:40 GMT
Useful research, even for non-smokers
Imagine how this could be used to help people who are exposed to other kinds of smoke, such as fire fighters, who may not always have the right breathing equipment handy... or if the dose could be given after exposure to smoke (such as in a regular home fire). Just because the research used cigarette smoke, doesn't necessarily mean it wouldn't apply to other kinds of smoke related injuries / professions, thus it's not money put to bad use, just your lack of imagination... please remove yourself from society sooner rather than later.
Go, because I'm done with you...