
Uh huh, sure, and that's why I make sarcastic comment like all the rest of the commentards, right?
2455 publicly visible posts • joined 17 Mar 2010
It's not as though the idea of a collapsar jump would be particularly useful even if it did work. Our distant descendants on a generational ship might be able to use one, but by the time they got there, assuming they were to leave right now, we'd have already colonized a couple of nearby solar systems.
Personally I'm still hoping for some brilliant physicist to come up with a practical way to make an Alcubierre drive. Of course they have to wait for some other physicist co come up with a way to harness exotic matter....and that physicist will have to wait till someone figures out how to produce exotic matter in significant quantities....which of course will have to wait till someone actually proves that the stuff exists....I'll stop now. My hopes of visiting Polaris in my lifetime are getting further away.
wonder how many Linux users we have based on the number of Linux downloads
You and me both. I know that I download Linux about 3-4 times a year (sometimes to set up a new box, but more often to play with X-distro that someone said they liked for a couple hours before deciding I still like my distro of choice better).
No thanks. A Facebook app? Maybe, if it offers a better experience than mobile.facebook.com (which, currently, it really doesn't in my opinion), but letting Facebook take over my home screen? No, that is never, ever going to happen.
As for iOS, wouldn't a home screen replacement be one of the things automatically denied in Apple's walled garden according to their developer rules?
Microsoft's security gnomes also deserve credit for quickly determining there was a problem before the vast majority of corporates rolled out the problematic patch.
I disagree. They deserve the blame for failing to follow the basic step of TESTING THEIR PATCH before they started to roll it out. How many times does this have to happen before Microsoft figures that out? It seems like they've been pushing out a dodgy patch two or three times a year for ages. That's the sort of thing I expect in the beta software I run, not in a fully released product like Windows.
2-3 people too many for regular launches but might well be justifiable for launching the components of a space elevator
Unless conventional launches cause deaths due to atmospheric pollution or something even a single death per year is too much for any method of launch.
This and other reporting leaves a bit unclear if they have actually managed to magnetically crunch even a single pellet so that it produces fusion energy.
That's essentially what a polywell device does, isn't it? And according to publically available data they may be able to actually break the all important breakeven point.
In fact, making the FDR work as explained would mean they have also cracked the problem of making Earth-bound fusion power plants.
MAKING a fusion plant isn't difficult. There's probably a dozen research fusion plants dotted around the world. The difficult part is getting more electricity out of them than you have to put in to make them work. Since they're using it as a rocket engine that's not a concern.
Doesn't the usefulness of solar panels degrade pretty much to "useless" once you get much further out than Mars? I get that right now Mars is the goal, but there are moons out further that might also, with a good enough energy source, be colonizable (yeah, yeah, now I'm making up words). Or, in the nearer term, this could be used to make mining asteroids a little more feasible, but only if you have enough power when the sun's a lot further away than it is on Earth.
The default position I have when driving is to assume the other drivers are about to do something stupid
They usually are. In my experience at any given moment on the road at least one driver within 50 yards is always about to do something stupid. Anticipating the stupid is one of the essential skills of a safe driver.
Most people can tune out constant background noise like the hum of an MRI. I know I've slept in one before, but I had been kept up for 30 someodd hours before hand specifically so I'd fall asleep easily, so that may not be the best example.
American media is taking all the BS this world and sticking it aggressively into people's heads. FB is taking all the BS from people's heads and broadcasting it to the world.
There fixed that for you. All the major American broadcasters are guilty, not just the one that jumped off the cliff to the right instead of following the rest off the cliff to the left.
So judging from what this article says it sounds like cats domesticated humans. Further it seems they did so for basically the same reason that humans domesticated cows: it makes getting food easier.
Just further proof that we are, despite what we think, a slave race to our feline overlords. Grumpy Cat will no doubt have some biting words for me for pointing this out.
I don't think the FBI has a prayer of winning this one. They're CLEARLY in violation of the 4th amendment, even if the last couple Presidents have largely ignored that part of the Constitution whenever they could get away with it.
If this case were to make it to the Supreme Court it could, depending on the wording of the official verdict, finally put an end to all the warrantless wiretaps. The things are already illegal, we just need a judge to say so and force them to stop.
*Waves to the friendly (or not) NSA agents who've been following all his recent rants*
Apple and Samsung are arguing that forcing companies to give up all their financial data will stop them from getting the courts' protection for their patents.
Sounds like a very good reason to force them to give up the data to me. Maybe we'd start seeing companies only bringing patent litigation when there's actually a good reason to do so.
I've got a manager over one site who's never deleted an email in his life. The man literally saves it all, even the spam. Do you have any idea how much space 20 years worth of email takes up in backups? Thankfully he retires in a couple months. I think I'll do the final backup of his inbox to /dev/null.
Aside from the technology barriers, are you really going to wait for one of those to come along before starting your journey?
Wait for one? No. Jump in behind one on the road? Sure. I don't know about the rest of the world, but in this little corner or the world it's danged near impossible to be on a major highway for more that half an hour without finding (and, since they tend to go slightly under the speed limit, usually passing) a big rig.
Personally if the system were set up the right way I'd have no problem slaving my car to a semi and getting to my destination a little later. Those guys are (usually) some of the most skilled drivers on the road. That's what happens when you've got a million or so miles of road behind you. Of course there's a lot of room for setting the system up wrong.
Actually some of these are good ideas. There are cars on the road now that detect when you're nodding off and nag you to pull into the nearest rest area or hotel. I always rather thought that was a good idea. It's not a feature I need (I have the sense to get off the road for a quick nap when I need to, which has annoyed my non-driving wife a time or two), but definitely one I'd like other people to have. And I have to admit I'd love to have a car that checks its own blind spots when preparing to change lanes. That would eliminate one of my bigger causes of road stress. For some reason I can't fathom my relatively small car has absolutely huge blind spots and no amount of fiddling with my mirrors has succeeded in shrinking them. I'd also love for the other drivers around here to have such a feature in their cars. I've had more than a few close calls because someone tried to make a lane change in heavy traffic without checking their blind spots.
Actually recent (VERY recent, like yesterday) reports show that they may now be able to 'functionally cure' HIV if they catch it early enough. My medical knowledge is above average*, but I'm still not quite sure what they mean by 'functionally cure' and the article I read was in a medical periodical so it didn't go into details for the uninitiated.
*Mostly due to being around medical professionals (both my parents, several aunts, an uncle, my sister, and numerous friends of the family) a lot. Sort of like how my wife knows more about computers than the average person just from having had to puzzle out what I'm talking about so often even though she's not a geek by any definition.
We have a one to one program with iPads in the district I work for. I was against it to, until I saw what a savvy teacher who's not wasting their time railing against it could do with the things. Quite frankly it's amazing how interactive a classroom suddenly becomes when every kid has an iPad.
I will also point out, backed by several years of experience in school based IT, that kids are actually easier on technology than grownups. I can hear you scoffing now, but it's true. 75% of our broken laptops have been due to abuse by teachers. Everything from coffee being spilled on them to them getting left of top of a car. Yes we have the occasional malicious kid. The one who threw a laptop out a 2nd floor window because 'it seemed like a good idea at the time' sticks in my mind, but that really was an anomaly.
We also have a number of measures in place for lost or damaged iPads. Each kid pays $40 for insurance which goes into a pool for replacing them when the need arises. We also have an iPad repair class (which Apple doesn't like, but meh) and some locator app that allows the people in charge of the iPad program to locate them anywhere in the world as long as they have internet access. Only twice has an iPad been lost and not recovered. One is somewhere in the high school. Somewhere in one of 4 classrooms covered by a single wifi access point in fact. When the battery finally died it hadn't moved for most of a week, but no one's been able to find it. The other one was stolen and has not yet popped up on the internet for us to track, possibly because the thief didn't grab the charger.
We've also saved a bundle in text books by using the iPads as ebook readers. Not quite the cost of the iPad itself, but one thing I will point out: the article is wrong about the cost of textbooks. They're $50-$90 a piece and most high school kids have 6-10 of them. They cost far more than iPads even before the hefty discount that we get.
Actually using a NAS simplifies my software list. I was originally using HTTP to push the data around, but there'd be no need for that with a NAS, so all you'd need is the software to take pics whenever there's a significant change to be noted. You'd use motion, configured to save to your NAS with a filename that includes a reference to the camera and datetime stamp. You'd still want a control box with the ability to clean up old files probably, but with a good sized NAS it wouldn't be strictly necessary.
The other option, video, would use streamer instead of motion, but the setup would be a little more work. I think it might also need a server to catch the stream. It's been a while since I put together the details.
Or, if you want a REALLY nice setup, check out ZoneMinder. It's a bit overkill in my opinion, especially if you're only thinking of one camera, but it'd make things easy.
Especially with the (relatively) new Raspi specific camera, the Raspi makes for a great security system. Get several of them, along with the above mentioned camera, and load them with software that either streams video out (if you have storage to burn) or clicks off a still whenever there's a certain threshold of change in the image. Pipe that to a server in your back room that saves the data. Extra cost: about $20 per Raspi for a cheap USB wireless card plus whatever the camera costs (I actually made plans for this before the Raspi cam was available). You'll need one more Raspi with a big external hard drive or an old PC to act as a storage node. The software is all in the Debian repository (though I don't have my list with me right at the moment to tell you exactly which packages you need).
By my math when I first looked at doing this you end up with the functional equivalent of a $700 security camera system for about $250 total. Of course I haven't yet convinced the other half that we have any need for such a system and thus have not been granted the permission to spend the money.
I've been saying for years that if you give me a better alternative for dealing with nuclear waste that's going to be around for several hundred thousand years than burying it then I would get behind nuclear power. Looks like it's finally happened. Sure there's still waste, but much less waste that's dangerous for less than 1000 years is something that can be dealt with.
Really? I steered clear of it. By that point I'd learned that anything with Kubrick's name attached to it was most likely artsy-fartsy to the point of tediously missing its own point. I reached that conclusion with 2001 actually, it being the third tediously-missing-its-own-point Kubrick movie I saw.
I love Blade Runner. I haven't seen it in years though. Something about a particular scene, about 15 minutes in, throws my epileptic wife into a seizure. The first time I thought nothing of it, the second time I thought it was an odd coincidence, but the third time she tried to watch it with me only to have a seizure during the exact same scene I learned my lesson. This great movie is now sadly banned from my house. The things we sacrifice for the sake of love.... :-(
Ubuntu doesn't work. It's buggy as hell (by Linux standards anyway) and is responsible for turning a lot of people off of Linux. For non-techies it simply requires too much fiddling under the hood to get it to run (not to mention the mess that is Unity). If you want user friendly, use Mint or Mepis, but for the love of Tux stay away from Ubuntu.
I must say from the problems he's describing it sounds to me like he never learned to set up a Linux desktop properly. That or he's been using Ubuntu (which, in my experience, is impossible to set up properly). All the things he listed as desktop Linux problems (suspend, wifi, and audio problems, kernel recompiling, graphics drivers) have been non-issues for me for years with Debian. Wifi just works, audio just works, I've not had problems with suspending or resuming in probably seven or eight years, I don't even remember the last time I recompiled a kernel, and the newest AMD graphics drivers are as easy to install in Linux as on Windows (I haven't used nVidia in quite a while).