Remember, the best protection from small explosions is...
Distance. Lots and lots of distance.
169 publicly visible posts • joined 13 Mar 2010
I just tried it and asked it a question for which I knew I would get a biased response where all the bad examples it came out with were unrealistically directed at just one political party. Then asked it what percentage of complaints were against one party vs the other and for some reason it wasn't able to tell me. I said that this should be possible to assess and it agreed. Eventually it conceded that it was probably primed with false information.
And the reason we have to watch the speedo so much in 20 mph limit zones is because the road has a design speed of 30 mph (sometimes it used to be 40 mph) and it is feels unnatural and unnecessary to be driving so slow. On a 30 mph limit road I don't need to look at the speedo so much because I know if I drive based on the road type, location and hazard perception then I'll likely be within the speed limit. Speed limits used to be based on safety necessity now they seem to be based on politics.
Only music in the "charts" has gone South. And that is probably not due to piracy. In fact a pirate warbling in a croaky Somerset accent would probably sound better than most of the current chart music.
I have never before in my life had so much access to fantastic music that I do like. It's just not in the pop charts anymore, that's all.
What would be the result of highly intelligent self awareness? Psychopaths aren't exactly known for being the brightest bulbs in the box in terms of having a fully functional brain with no parts suppressed and shut down. Why would a super-intelligent AI want to emulate such a disability?
Nothing to do with left/right/liberals, or my own political views, or what you think my political views may be.
From the Taliban's point of view, who are the ones making the claim, it makes no difference which political party is in power. Foreign policy towards the Taliban will be the same regardless and the BBC viewpoint will reflect that policy. Therefore, as far as the Taliban are concerned the "state" in the UK is constant and the BBC are part of it.
'The BBC is funded by British households to the tune of £159 ($194) a year and strives "to act in the public interest, serving all audiences through the provision of impartial, high-quality and distinctive output and services which inform, educate and entertain." The "state" does not have a hand in its coverage.'
The state has no hand in the BBC's coverage??? This has to be some kind of joke, right? Also I would love a chance to offer the Taliban some anger management training should they be bold enough to post something that shows up in my Twitter feed. Bring it on!