re:The only way that we will see an ad-free internet
I wasn't talking about an "ad-free" internet for everyone.
Just for me.
3225 publicly visible posts • joined 5 Mar 2010
this weird dynamic stalemate that ad-slingers and ad-blockers has morphed into some weird alternate universe where the elephant in the room: that nobody wants adverts is ignored.
I'd pay £<x> a month to not get ads. Anywhere.
Amazon and Netflix have twigged, whilst Sky et al seem to be stuck in the 1980s where people pay a premium and get ads.
Especially in a professional context, I could see an ad-free (no sponsored results, no SEO engineered cruft) Google subscription going down well commercially. After all, most searches are horribly inefficient and getting worse.
not even close.
The one thing about Outlook - for better, for worse, is it integrates calendar and email as seamlessly as a clueless user needs.
One thing about being out of the corporate fold, and using Linux for *everything* is you realise how good MS were where it counts.
That said, I never understood why even Outlook couldn't match calendar entries and OOO so that if you accepted a meeting as OOO, your Outlook wouldn't automatically switch OOO on ???????
I totally love my old-stylee WileyFox Swift. It's pretty much note-perfect in terms of features, and price point.
Their customer service on the other hand ... it would give too positive an impression to use the words woefully inadequate.
If history has taught us anything, it's that attention to detail trumps technical prowess. Ask Sony how Betamax worked out for them .....
I really, really wanted them to do well.
On a more pragmatic note, where can I find a dual-SIM quad-core phone with a 5.5" display that can take an SD card, and has a removable battery and (the only 2 features missing on my Swift) a fingerprint sensor and NFC capability for less than £150 ? (Seeing as my WF Swift was £129 in 2015)
Ever since this project was announced, I can't help but think it's a sequel to the M+M experiment to find the ether.
I think there's a good justification for looking back at some of the ideas previously dismissed as "wrong" to see if they might in fact have had some germ of sense in them ?
A bit like the current vogue for looking back at old medicines for new applications .....
If the police can't delete the relevant images, then their use as evidence should be struck out.
What's that you say ? UK courts are happy to allow illegally obtained evidence ?
Say it ain't so !?
Oh, it is.
You're fscked.
"The fruit of the poison tree" is an Americanis I would welcome.
Any half competent defence barrister will just insist that any US evidence is presented in person, and can be cross examined. Which simply cannot - and will not - ever happen. Because the witness would be forced to refuse to answer questions on the basis of (US) national security.
Remember when Thatcher was silly enough to try and prosecute Peter Wright in Australia ? The Australians ran rings around the UK witness, and forced him to admit under oath that he had lied in his evidence.
it's nothing new.
I've also been saying - even since I saw it demonstrate some *real* intelligence, that IBMs Watson should have a crack.
I was at IBMs labs, and Watson managed to return information that could only have been found by reading the context of the question (as opposed to just returning documents that contained the words in the question).
The GoogleFlop has a related AmazonFail, whereby when searching for - say a USB HDD - you have no way to specify USB2.0 or USB3.0, but you can specify "blue", "white", or "grey"
On a related note, has anyone had those really weird YouGov surveys where they seem to think that peoples first thought when booking a holiday is not "where shall we go ?" but "which airport shall we us ?".
was my first thought
How come the entire Arab Spring was managed by Twitter in 2012 with a mobile and mainly anonymous population, and these clowns can't get letters letters FFS to a static address in the same unwar-torn country ????????
There will be small "3rd world" countries looking at the UK wondering "and this is what we are supposed to aspire to ?"
What on earth was I doing over 30 fucking years ago, diligently working on RFCs for email and email addressing ?????? I should have been taking Pitman instead.
Can't speak for the PP, but I'd certainly make sure that my cryptogoodies were protected by a smart contract which prevented them being moved in a single block, over a single day, and which required other external factors to be recorded on the blockchain before paying out. Maybe a token transfer a day or two before, from another actor ?
But as I am learning, a lot of people simply do not understand blockchain - and more importantly what it's capable of.
Well, if you hang the right person, that's true.
But as the Christie case shows, hang the wrong person, and you increase crime, as the real offender is still free and the police aren't looking for them ... because they hanged them.
I tend to find proponents of capital punishment rarely think things through.
The cigarette companies went to great lengths to produce report after report that concluded that advertising had no effect on consumer uptake of smoking (and that adverts were merely intended to persuade smokers to switch brand).
Which would have been believable, had the cigarette companies not continued to spunk *billions* on advertising over the ensuing decades.
You don't spend that much money on something which doesn't work.
(unless it's called "Brexit" that is)u
The UK for not requiring assurances from Sweden that he wouldn't be extradited to the USA.
The UK didn't need any assurances. The UK HAS A VETO.
I really hope there aren't any morons here who are going to start blabbering that "The UK should have done this" or "Sweden should have done that". Fuck that.
The UK and Sweden treated Assange like anyone else suspected of a criminal act. He doesn't get to call the shots.
All very valid points. But not really the issue.
The bottom line is Assange jumped bail, and risks making UK law look even more asinine that it is.
That simply cannot happen. Otherwise every foreign criminal will simply jump bail in the UK.
Furthermore, Assange is manifestly the author of his own downfall.
If I were in the UK foreign office, I'd have a quiet word with whoever has sight of UK->Ecuador trade, and see if I could recover the millions from them. Because the bottom line is Assange is a squalid alleged rapist, not some freedom fighting hero. Shame on Ecuador for falling for the Assange hype-machine, along with any similarly hoodwinked El Reggers who (still) prattle on about some fanciful US snatch squad just waiting to whisk the Blond one off to Waterboardsville.
surely there is an absolute fortune to be made here. It matters not a jot that unicorns don't really exists. If Theresa May is continuing to insist they do, then surely she'd be willing to spunk a few million on them.
Don't worry about being exposed by an "expert" we all know they're biased anyway. And if one should get close, just suggest it's just jealous because they didn't think of it first.
We could trumpet it to the world as a sterling example of post-Brexit British excellence.
Last year, on one episode of the News Quiz, Simon Evans noted that when people are in hospital, they are leaving a perfectly good bed at home, which he proposed the NHS use to accommodate patients. This was followed by a joke about Uber ambulances to do the transport.
At the end, Jeremy Hardy quietly said that he hoped politicians weren't using topical news quizes for policies.
A month later, we had the announcement from Essex Health Trust about people "AirBnB ing" beds for patients.
but I'm guessing there must be some mighty pissed off companies here.
I wonder if the ICO views a commercial confidence breach more seriously that personal details ?
(Starting with the observation that the ICO couldn't really care less about personal data breaches.)
My recollection is the Estonian Prime Minsters grasp of the subject was pretty impressive, and he was completely aware of what digital ID was - and was not. (I'm sure peeps can find the El Reg article themselves).
We really have to find a way to lose this ludicrous arrogance that because we are "British" we are somehow naturally good at shit. Because generally, I'd say we were naturally shit at being good.
Didn't they use sourcesafe ?
Anyway, I will bet that the source isn't "lost". It's all there. In fact, probably a bit too much.
The real problem is they have no idea what combination of patches and modules actually compiles to the binaries they've been shipping. So they can't "tweak" the program without a thorough testing cycle of the base source beforehand.