The most famous brand in physical security
Well if you count the Brinks Mat robbery then you are probably right.
3639 publicly visible posts • joined 5 Mar 2010
of sorting their fucking stock out.
If you use the online site to shop from favourites, you will be aware of the parade of items that are "Out of stock". If you don't use favourites it hides the entry for them to give the illusion of their being somehow competent.
The UKs Attorney General has been instructed to lay proceedings against the US government for
"The divers and repeated use of His Majesties Common Law of England, most egregiously exploited in the Supreme Court therein and without honour or restitution to the originating party as is the ancient custom and practice of this land".
Because as quoted last week, the US still relies on English Common Law (and why not, it's clearly superior to anything they have cooked up in 250 years).
It's much more is it in any way related to life on earth.
If not, then we can still consider that life can emerge under the right conditions.
If it is, then it raises the further question of where it originated whilst still not answering if it's unique or not.
Surely the safest outfit is one that has spread the risk, using all flavours of OS and application software to mitigate a single point of failure ?
And the role of compliance is to say to the lock in vendors "That's nice dear, but we're the ones paying"
I have zero sympathy for Microsoft here. And only marginally less for any organisation that has allowed it to become their problem too.
She was not. She was a narrow minded little bigot who would have got cross that outfits like Reform nicked her tricks.
She headed an organisation that would happily have perjured itself to send people to jail if they hadn't been rumbled by a court.
Do not rewrite history. *My* history.
downvote all you like. As you explain to me what it was about the previous 30 years of MS behaviour that made you think "You know what ? This time thins will be different".
I have been using "AI" for the past 5 years in a professional capacity. And my original observation that it's most useful feature is to work around the shite that is modern IT still stands.
can lead to so many profitable discussions.
Also, the reasons for wanting sovereignty can change the definition. Are you cost cutting ? Are you trying to ensure resilience ? Are you wanting to control expenditure (not the same as cost cutting) or are you trying to eliminate any possible insecurities ?
I'd wager that well over 80% of businesses interest in sovereignty is to avoid subscription price gouging and to retain the ability to put their data where they want, when they want with not extra costs.
Which means this article is really aimed at (checks notes) less than 20% of companies
and it's not owning every single component and it's means of production.
It's about having control over what you have paid for.
The two are not synonymous. And anyone who conflates the two is dim, or has an agenda or both. Either way their contribution is of questionable value.
From memory the Apollo computers were bespoke in a way they had to be, Whilst you may be able to simulate them with more general purpose kit, I *really* wouldn't like to try it for real.
Remember for Apollo 11 the computer had to deal with overload without failing - and it was needed.
However all of that being said i am supremely happy that space travel still inspires the nerdiverse.
Virtual pint --->
Why ?
Esteemed though El Reg is, if it is reporting even 10% of the reality, that's 9% too much.
How come media outlets - which are approaching pisspoor from the wrong side - suddenly become siren voices of truth when writing about the purported woeful inadequacies in UK or NATO defences.
Did no one stop to think maybe this in itself is part of our defences ?