Yawn.
Another day.
Another data breach.
Another version of "lessons will be learned, we take security very seriously" etc etc
No one in outfit suffers any consequences (or cares about the customers)
Time for rea, and I'm 'aving 'oops.
3231 publicly visible posts • joined 5 Mar 2010
undercut existing e-commerce providers and monopolise the market in order to gain massive leverage over tariffs and the like. With western consumer manufacturing practically non existent governments either say "how high" or face riots on the streets, Either suits Bejing.
A business model laid out in the "history" section of your ever closing library under "what the British did", and "What the British did next".
ISO this, BS that,
How come - in an industry that fetishises standards - there isn't an ISO/RFC standard for authentication that mandates password hashing, etc etc. Possibly with a account recovery procedure appendix.
30+ years in IT, and we are still having to fix the roll your own brigades fuck ups. Because yes, your little postcode validation routine must be better than something tried and tested for decades.
Not true.
The fact it's not more widely used suggests the powers that be aren't so keen on teh idea of data they can't slurp.
March 2020, management: You can *only* WFH or the company dies.
This is a classic case of the powers that be being caught in a lie, and using "can't" as a synonym for "won't".
I'm mildly surprised we haven't seen hysterical headlines about "WFH helps terrorists", or "only paedos would WFH"
Everything gets promoted above it's level of competence. Ay which point you have to rely on the unpromoted parts.
I give you ... the cloud.
We also need to bear in mind John Glenns famous observation about sitting atop a bomb build by a collective of lowest bidders.
You think your PHB were tight ? Imagine how much these "cloud corporations" are trying to get away with not spending.
or maybe they did ages ago, and we are only just realising.
"Olden days" - the OS was needed to manage the machines resources most effectively, efficiently and properly.
The future: the OS is merely a shim between the user and the AI cloud.
Looking at cars might help. Gone are the days the driver had to adjust the advance/retard themselves as well as tweaking the fuel/air mixture in flight. Now they just drive.
That being said, you can fuck off if you think I want any sort of AI in my OS. Especially MS AI.
I'm sure all of us have had a moment when an alert pops up and no one has any idea (a) where it's coming from and (b) what it does.
Little tip: if you ensure you do a grown-up test of your UPSs by actually shutting things down (because as long as the mains is connected the battery remaining is a guesstimate you really don't want to rely on) you can winkle out some dinosaur processes.
Also restarting your comms to flush out DHCP reservation issues.
How fucking difficult is it for programmers to wrap a tiny sanity check around the "To/CC/BCC" fields in their shitty email "apps" to pause for a second if there are more than (say) 10 people in the field ?
"Your email appears to be going to more than 10 people, and may include more people on the BCC list. Do you wish to check before sending ?"
for example. With an additional flag to enforce it for more paranoid organisations.
Or or we waiting for Apple to fucking patent it ?