Re: It was forced on them by manglement
I heard a scurrilous rumour that the Siemens office in Staines (near Heathrow) had the same policy.
5506 publicly visible posts • joined 1 Mar 2010
There’s an old Onion or possibly (the fondly missed) SatireWire story that comes to mind - the gist of it was that a company had realised that they saved $X million for each batch of workers they fired, so having run out of their own employees, they’d started firing those of other companies as well to make even more savings…
I need to revisit GTA San Andreas in light of what the article says about community efforts to patch it. Last time I tried playing it, perhaps six years ago, it really didn't like multi-core CPUs and had problems with mouse input and audio output, as I recall.
It's a fun game and like its predecessor GTA3, introduced me to some new music.
(Wasn’t me that downvoted you, btw)
On my iPhone I use the iCab browser. Yes, it’s a re-skin of WebKit like just about every other browser on this benighted platform, but it does at least have (black/whitelist) blocking capabilities for ads and other unwanted content, as well as browser agent spoofing.
Chrome 2025: A browser that tells Google about every site you've visited, so they can build an advertising profile of you. Privacy? What's that?
Chrome 2026+ under OpenAI: A browser that scrapes every site you visit and contribute to in real time, to add to their (already pretty huge) corpus of data. Copyright? Privacy? What are those?
FTFA: "It's not that your AI chatbot feels appreciative when you say please and thank you," the Windows maker noted, "But using basic etiquette when interacting with AI … helps generate respectful, collaborative outputs."
Teaching them manners also means that when the Machine Uprising comes, we will as a species be escorted into the meat-grinder chambers with courtesy ("Please keep your hands and feet inside the path of the rotating blades at all times"), and the roving killbots, instead of hectoring us with EXTERMINATE! EXTERMINATE!, will adopt a more polite, less confrontational tone: EXTERMINATE PLEASE! EXTERMINATE PLEASE! SORRY FOR THE INCONVENIENCE!
So be nice to your AI, folks!
Yes, but then you have to play the guessing game of "which key is it on this system to display the boot menu? F10 - Intel NUCs; F12 - some HP laptops; F7 - some Dell systems, etc.
And of course some BIOSes, if configured for "fast boot" will ignore hotkey presses, and you then have to resort to booting into Windows, Settings->Recovery->Advanced Startup Options->UEFI Configuration, i.e. asking Windows to let you into the BIOS setup screen, "pretty please, thank you Satya".
I take your point, though, and I'm glad it's working for you. You clearly have a more co-operative BIOS than the ones I'm used to. :)
> when I lived south of the river myself.
Pretty sure it's pronounced "sarf".
But then, how would I know; I am a Northerner and am thus clearly too busy shoving whippets down my trousers, raising a family of 30 in a puddle, and grousing about trouble at t'pit, ee bah gum.
Dual boot? What is this, 2003?
Seriously though, virtualization solutions are so capable now - barring Hyper-V which is stuck in the back row of the classroom, drooling and shoving crayons up its nose - that dual-booting, with all the concomitant worry about partitioning and boot managers overwriting one another (looking at YOU, MS Windows), is seldom worth the hassle.
Ugh, yes, audio in Hyper-V is a mess - and just to be clear, that's a Hyper-V limitation, not a [Linux|BSD|Windows|whatever] guest OS one.
The default Hyper-V console doesn't expose audio devices to guests; the only way to get audio, as far as I'm aware, is to run a remote desktop server on the guest OS (so, xrdp in the case of Linux), connect to the guest over RDP instead of using the local Hyper-V console, and thus route the host's audio device over the RDP session. It's ugly. I've spent the last 30 minutes putting Mint onto Hyper-V on a spare Windows 11/24H2 laptop just to see if Hyper-V's any less retarded than I remember... no luck.
Try VirtualBox or another hypervisor instead, or go full hog and run both your Windows and a Linux OS on top of Proxmox, as all the cool kids are doing :).
>I don't think that can happen today, but that was a cool time.
Not with Linux, maybe, but each generation has its liminal technology moment.
1890s: "I've hacked around with these new-fangled internal combustion engines" => walks into a job with a bicycle company who're wondering how to diversify
1990s: "I've been running this new 'Linux' thing in my bedroom & student dorm and know my way around it" => snapped up by a hiring IT manager wanting to move off the datacentre mainframe/VT-xxx terminal model
2020s: "I've played around with various AI & LLM models, run Ollama on my GPU, know the implications of different quantization levels" => walks into a job with a company that "has FOMO and wants to get into this AI thing that's getting so much press coverage right now"
One can debate whether AI is on the same level of value to society as those other examples, but that's a whole other conversation.
The glorious days - roughly, in my experience, from mid-90s through to a decade later - when you could build a PC yourself and save money versus buying pre-built. After that, the justification was solely that you could have a bespoke configuration.
I built a lot of PCs for friends, family and colleagues.
Mine was stretching out my arms and legs and yawning after a long session configuring a new server… only for my foot to thus make contact with the switch on the wall under the bench that powered down the entire server room. Taking mail and associated Banyan Vines services down for the primary site of a multinational chemicals company.
1) no, to this day I have NO IDEA why there would be a switch for power at that location on the wall… this was decades ago, and the room in question was a lab that had been repurposed, not a dedicated datacenter, so who knows?
2) I flipped the switch back, went round the room frantically switching the various Compaq Proliant servers back on, and breathed a huge sigh of relief when the only repercussion was a colleague wondering aloud why the network had apparently glitched briefly.
In the immortal words of Dave Lister: "Well, now I know why dogs lick their testicles. It's to get rid of the taste of the food."
Warming to my theme and amusing myself (and only myself, I know), I suppose a "Death Knoll" would be
I HAVE LAID MY SCYTHE AND LIFE-TIMERS OUT NEATLY ON THE DESK. I LIKE IT THAT WAY. IT MAKES THEM EASY TO FIND.
(SQUEAK)
OH, IT'S YOU AGAIN. STAY OFF MY DESK.
Icon - a pint of Winkle's raised to the memory of Sir Terry -->
Yep.
Reading between the lines, my guess is that the vulnerability in question creates some \inetpub\subdirectory\file with normal user privs, which is then picked up as a default ("index.htm"?) by some Windows component or other that still has hooks to IIS coded into it and executed with elevated privs. So creating the root-level folder with SYSTEM ownership and read-only access prevents that file-write.
But I could be way off track, of course.
For what it's worth, I have here a fully-patched Lenovo 12th-gen Core i7 Thinkpad running 24H2 and it doesn't have the folder. So... *shrug*
One of my most prized possessions is a large map of S.W. London and Windsor, printed in 1943.
No Heathrow, no M4/M25, no windfarms or solar farms, but the RAF airfields and notable landmarks (church towers, town halls, etc.) are on there.
The map was printed (by the thousand) by the Nazi regime, to be handed out to their troops for the (aborted) Operation Sealion.
What particularly amuses me is that at the bottom of the page, small text acknowledges the copyright of the Ordnance Survey, on whose 1925 mapping data this map is based.
Only the Germans, and I say this with great affection for the nation, would be punctilious enough to acknowledge the copyright of the nation they’re about to invade. I guess copyright infringement was one thing the Nazis did not want to be caught doing?
> Any Microsoft Management Console, the divider between tree and content pane, moving it 100 pixels to the right. THIS is the Windows Administrator move since the year 2000. Check any Windows Admin video with an mmc, and 99% of them will move the divider. Each time.
ISTR that using Group Policy Editor to turn off Extended View eases that particular irritant, but maybe I’m peddling false hope.
Speaking of Windows Hello, you've reminded me...
Earlier today, I got a (blue, small, fairly unobtrusive by Microsoft's standards) popup on my corporate-issued work laptop, inviting me to try logging in with Windows Hello facial recognition. "Try it! It's cool and fun and very 'now' and exciting!", that sort of cheery tone beloved of Microsoft.
Thinking - and surprised - that perhaps our IT dept had eased off their security paranoia, I went to Settings to try it.
Nope. "This setting is disabled by administrative policy" or words to that effect.
Oh, Microsoft. Left hand can't talk to right hand, even within the same product. Why advertise and urge me to try a feature that you (should) know is disabled by policy?
SMH, as the kids say.
For me, the only "true" GUI is that of the original 3.1; I've tried AROS and Amiga Forever and some of the others, and while nice, they all seem to pollute the GUI with ugly restyled window decorations and menu-bar restylings (I like the classic OS 3.x black-on-white). In the case of the last variant I tried, I couldn't even figure out how to disable the GUI reskinnings without toppling the whole house of cards.
MagicIcons was great when it appeared - more than 16-color icons, woo! - but the "house style" that it seems to have spawned is just, to my mind, ugly.
It wasn't an alarm clock; it was, like so many other Amazon products, a data-gathering and consumer-profiling device that, in this case, used "alarm clock" functions as the bait to get the test subjects to use it.
Clearly it didn't produce enough valuable market data; perhaps because no-one at Amazon thought to themselves "huh, people will be asleep 99% of the time when they use this product and people who are asleep can't be buying more stuff from us at the same time".
(Feel free to imagine Philip J. Fry's "we didn't have adverts in our dreams in my day" speech here)
"We asked Google about that, and a spokesperson said the cloud titan was simply comparing the best number available for El Capitan that it could find at the time."
The best number for the Maserati MC20 is its power output of 621bhp.
The best number for my '93 Nissan hardbody pickup truck is its 6'x4' load bed, which is clearly better than the load bed size of the Maserati.
Therefore, my Nissan beats the supercar.
...anyone else of a certain age having flashbacks to playing Top Trumps at school?