Re: Obligatory
Uptime? Reliability? Fog-edaboutit…
5506 publicly visible posts • joined 1 Mar 2010
> Then had to look up how you get the car to switch on everything but NOT start the engine
Generally, pressing the start button whilst NOT pressing the brake pedal will do what you want. Holding the brake pedal down at the same time is required to start the car - at least, on the dozens of different keyless-start cars I’ve driven.
Andrew Orlowski, formerly of this parish, has a thoughtful piece up on the Telegraph about the AI hype machine and its fundamental Emperor’s-new-clothes nature.
With, of course, this being the Telegraph, lots of ranting comments underneath about how AI is the best thing ever and is revolutionizing medicine, genetic science, law, and so on & how Andrew just doesn’t “get” how amazingly world-changing and paradigm-shattering AI is.
Investment portfolio positions of the commenters not disclosed, of course.
Nuh-uh.
As part of the new Windows development process, every single line of the Windows 10 codebase was carefully examined, and Microsoft's finest minds asked themselves, "how much more evil can we make this line as we go to 11?"
And the answer in most cases was: none. None more black evil.
Dunno why you downvoted me (if it was you?) because in my comment I didn't express an opinion one way or the other on whether MS should continue to support Windows 10.
Although for what it's worth,
a) I don't think it's reasonable for them to continue to support it after 10 years; operating systems aren't cars or washing machines or houses (the usual consumer goods offered as comparison for warranty purposes), for the principle reason that what you use a PC for changes over its lifetime, from word-processing to gaming to virtual reality to generative AI, and so the hardware must change and evolve too. Whereas a washing machine, say... well, on the first day you use it, you put clothes in and expect them to come out clean, and 10 years later, you're still putting very similar clothes in and expecting the same outcome. Washing machines don't have to evolve to handle, say, 5-dimensional virtual hypertrousers, or underpants that explode if rotated, or clothes that take the form of a 9x4x1 black monolith.
b) But equally, the hardware requirements for Windows 11 do seem to be artificially high for no other reason than to say "fuck you, we can't be bothered supporting older stuff any more". I will never again take any of Microsoft's environmental sanctimony even vaguely seriously. "Windows Update will schedule updates for when your local electricity is carbon-neutral"... yeah, right, after the mountains of e-waste that their actions have created, that's the green-washing equivalent of "no whipped cream on my jumbo extra-thick lard milkshake please, I want to be healthy".
It was actually 2015; just over 10 years to the day ago.
And if you've blanked out the whole "gwx.exe" nightmare, with Microsoft using dark patterns and "are you sure you don't not want to not decline the opportunity to accept this upgrade, oh you clicked the X button, that must mean YES PLEASE INSTALL 10" shenanigans, then you're not alone.
I do remember the BT Friends and Family scheme, which gave discounted call rates to a list of (5?) phone numbers that you could choose for yourself. And of course, in the pre-0800-dialup days, everyone added their ISP to the F&F scheme. The BT chairman of the time, as I recall, commented that anyone who did so was "sad".
> Although the flash games were fun.
Anyone else remember Joe Cartoon's "Frog In A Blender" and "Hamster In A Microwave" flash animations? Very silly.
And then of course there were such cultural touchstones as Badger Badger Badger and Weebl & Bob.
Truly, an embarrassment of Flash-based riches. Kids today, etc etc.
If someone hasn’t already uploaded the “Kilroy Was ‘Ere” image (a 1940s running joke, or what we would nowadays call a *shudder* meme) then I am disappointed!
“…the issue stems from large language models' inability to distinguish between inputs which are user prompts and inputs which are for reference…”
Isn’t this just the AI version of the old “persuade the CPU to treat data pages as code” attack vector?
We’ve had NX Bit / Data Execution Prevention support in processors and operating systems for 20+ years; is there really not an equivalent for AIs?
Last time I tried posting to Slashdot, Anonymous comments were disabled (understandably, given the horrendous trolling problems that site's seen), and the "create new account" process was disabled too.
I get the impression it's just home to a dwindling number of older accounts now.
This goes beyond "dark patterns" and into the realms of "what do you mean you couldn't find the Local User option, it was in a filing cabinet in a disused lavatory cubicle behind a locked door with a sign saying Beware Of The Leopard..."
Anyway, thank you for a useful article. The necessary incantations change every few months, as Microsoft slowly boil the Windows 11 userbase frog and make it more and more difficult to avoid using a Microsoft account.
You might also mention that not entering a password during setup is a handy way to dodge the "3 security questions" rigmarole. The article alludes to it but presents it as a Bad Thing. Personally I use a password manager and don't need "security questions" - so I leave the password blank during Setup, and set it after installation.
I still do 99% of my development in WinForms. I've dabbled once or twice with WPF; the results are much nicer (e.g. automatic handling of high-DPI or font scaling) but updating UI elements at run-time is a pain.
The expression I've heard is that "WPF makes complicated things trivial, and trivial things complicated" and I can't disagree.
I dipped my toe into WinUI3 once because I was worried I was becoming a luddite, but when my simple Hello World-level program compiled to something like 100MB of binary and dependencies (unless I wanted to distribute it through the Windows Store), I ran away at high speed screaming "bugger that for a game of soldiers".
Always assumed that integrated graphics was another support chip on the motherboard and not part of the silicon real estate of the CPU.
Used to be, back in the 810/845/915 chipset days (early Pentium 4).
Originally, the Intel graphics were just something to fill up otherwise wasted space on the chipset die (“we can fit 50,000 gates in the empty space, what graphics output can we do within that budget?”)
Then they moved onto the CPU and got gradually more and more complex, as “decent performance” became more important than “don’t increase the die size”.
And if I recall correctly, the difference between Xeon parts and their equivalent desktop cousins has generally (with a few exceptions) been that the former had ECC support whereas the latter had integrated graphics.
Me, reading the article: "ooh! I have the same GPU as Linus! That is even more of a claim to fame than my having met Gyles Brandreth back in 1991!"
...and then I reached the line
...At least one Reg commenter this year, "David 132," runs the same thing...
Don't know whether to feel flattered that I've been namechecked, or deeply embarrassed that I still haven't upgraded. ¿Porque no los dos?
In my defence, all my spare cash these days goes on duck feed. And no, that's not a euphemism.
A previous employer of mine had a thermal test chamber for very similar purposes.
One day a colleague spilled coffee on his keyboard. It being a bombproof Model M or equivalent, he rinsed it clean under the tap and put it in the TTC to dry it out.
Which was a brilliant plan except that he forgot about it in there.
He was reminded, when the smoke alarms went off and the entire site got evacuated to the car-park.
Apparently, the keyboard, once retrieved, looked somewhat Dali-esque.
I fail to see how vista_startup.wav could "accidentally" have been included in the Windows 11 build process.
The most likely explanation is that a developer put it in the tree as a private joke, and it was inadvertently included in the build.
What next, "accidentally" including the Windows XP Teletubbies wallpaper, or the WfWG3.11 startup logo?
The odious Peter Kyle, the Science Secretary, has claimed today that Nigel Farage, and all the rest of us who are opposed to the Online Safety Act regardless of how we feel about Farage, are "on the side" of "extreme pornographers" and Jimmy Savile.
So, that's us told, then.
Can we please stop framing this as a Labour vs. Tories, Right vs. Left thing? It's authoritarianism versus the rest of us, and both parties are equally guilty.
It's relating to "persona-based marketing", which was the latest greatest most exciting thing in Marketing about 5-10 years ago.
You divide up your customer base by their roles & interests, assign "personas" to each sub-section of the market, and give them back-stories, then craft your marketing messages accordingly.
e.g.
"Rajesh is an IT administrator and often works remotely. He requires fast performance and the latest technologies in a portable thin & light form-factor"
"Alice is a developer and needs a large screen and lots of RAM..."
etc etc.
Pure twaddle but it allows marketing wonks to think that they're being user-focused.
> whilst at the same time making the whole user experience thoroughly miserable and also hoovering up your system resources like a rampant parasitic leech
You forgot “and increasing the attack surface for malware”.