Re: Considering
I'm sure the architect has thought of that, and written "Do not use Heavy Water" on the plans.
5325 publicly visible posts • joined 1 Mar 2010
I was initially hostile to the new layout, then learned to accept it, but logging on tonight - Firefox, with uBlock Origin and NoScript disabled, I add - none of the stories seem to have a link to their Comments at either the top or bottom of the page. Even stories that I was commenting on earlier today.
A temporary glitch?
Mercifully, I remembered the direct address https://forums.theregister.com so was able to come here!
Well, I might need to temper my earlier optimism.
As I write this, the front-page story related to this one, Mozilla boasts Mythos boosted Firefox bug cull , doesn't have a link to its comments, whether at the top or the bottom of the article. Now, it's possible that comments have been consciously disabled on that story, I suppose, but if so then a clearer indication would be nice.
Firefox with UBO and NoScript and sundry other privacy-focussed plugins here, and I see the "bubble" icon just fine. It's also visible at the bottom of each article, next to the relevant tags (e.g. [IBM] [OFF-PREM] ❑). Perhaps the Reg web team's tweaked the code since your comment?
"The overal consensus is, the new format sucks donkey balls, none of your viewers, ie customers, like it and we all want you to change it back to the old format and fonts. And, slap whoever came up with this with a monkfish, left out in the sun a couple of weeks."
"...but apart from that, Mrs Lincoln, how was the play?"
As I understand it, PiHole is purely a DNS white/blacklist filter. So it'll remove ad content that's pulled from a separate domain, purely by 404'ing (or 523'ing?) any requests to ads.sitename.com, but it can't remove content that appears (by DNS trickery or whatever other dark arts) to come from the first-party site.
Amen.
You'd think the Reg team, being aware that their readership are technical, crotchety, and strongly opinionated (and I don't mean those pejoratively) would at least have piloted the new layout for a period first ("new.theregister.com" / "old.theregister.com" à la Reddit, for example).
Don't know how much is down to my innate neophobia, but my initial reaction to the new layout is that I hate it. Too many images, seemingly random article placement (a few minutes ago I clicked on an interesting-looking story that was prominent on the front page, only to notice that it actually dates from 3 months ago) and the font-choice is jarring.
Grumble, grumble.
And now you've subliminally motivated me to cue up an early 90s choonz playlist on my Musicbee while I work. Things like
The Prodigy - Out of Space; The Shamen - Ebeneezer Goode / LSI / Boss Drum; Urban Cookie Collective - The Key The Secret; Urban Hype - A Trip To Trumpton; KLF - Justified and Ancient; Stereo MC's - Connected; Happy Mondays - Step On
Ah, happier times. In the immortal words of Jarvis Cocker,
"and you want to call your mother and say / Mother, I can never come home again / cos I seem to have left an important part of my brain somewhere / somewhere in a field in Hampshire."
(Edit: perhaps, as part of their technical overhaul, the Reg team will fix the bug that inserts all the extra linebreaks in comments? I had to put the tracklist onto one line, because otherwise it
looked
like
this)
Back in the day when one of the default Windows wallpapers was named Bliss.jpg or something, I needed a copy of it from a Linux machine and searched for (IIRC) "Bliss wallpaper", but making the mistake of having Safe Search turned off.
My word.
So very many young ladies enjoying themselves en plein air.*
(*I emphasize that this was many years ago back when the Web was wild and untamed, not the morally-pure sanitised corporate sandbox it is now, so don't bother searching. I'm sure such naughty images are no longer to be found... :/ )
That's OK, with the Reg's new layout and its propensity to surface (ugh, sorry) really, really old articles on the front page, I just assumed that you were correct and I was reading a story from last month. Then I saw that your comment was only a few hours old and got really confused as to what date it is.
I knew I should have put more potato-peelings into the Mr Fusion :)
I once sat through an hour-long meeting to discuss a Powerpoint presentation that a senior exec was going to give at an industry conference, containing technical data sourced from my group. 58 of those minutes were spent listening to the verbal masturbation of his TA deliberating whether or not to move a text-box 10 pixels to the left and enlarge its font size by 2 points.
It made the Schleswig-Holstein Question or Jarndyce v. Jarndyce look like "what colour socks shall I wear today".
And in the final insult to Dr Hook, even Bill Gates has made it onto the cover of "Rolling Stone".
CYA run rampant. Companies prattle about "empowering employees to take risks" but when something goes wrong, do the senior management say "well, it was a calculated risk, but it didn't pan out"? Do they say "we empowered this employee to make the call, so it's our responsibility that it went wrong"? Or do they say, "this employee made the decision without appropriate risk analysis, it's all his fault"?
Clue: it's rarely (a) or (b).
And so in too many large enterprises, you get North Korean levels of risk aversion and upwards-buck-passing.
Did you perhaps mean 128MB, if you're riffing on that old 640 joke?
Or have I just been, as da kids say, whooshed?
(Addendum to my earlier comment above - full disclosure, "1979 me" would have actually said something like "brbrbrbrbrbbbrbrb wanna wanna teddy wanna teddy NOW", as I was still in nappies. I was precocious, yes, but not that precocious.)
FTA: "...and a Raspberry Pi Zero 2 W - a low-power board with 512 MB of RAM - meaning it can't do too much..."
2026 me to 1979 me: "We have a self-contained computer with 4x 1GHz cores, 512MB RAM, a touch-capable 1280x400 full colour LCD screen, and wireless networking in the megabits-per-second speed range. Oh, and the motherboard costs the equivalent to you of £2.40. But we won't be able to 'do too much with it'."
1979 me: "Errr...."
"People looking for a quick profit from the elderly care sector want the facilities to be built quickly and cheaply so that they can be stuffed with wrinkly cash-cows and the returns can start flowing"
"Uhhh... boss, that's commendably forthright and accurate, but may I suggest that we run it through Claude to be re-written into a more, um, fluffy form?"
I'm ashamed - no, dammit, proud - that my first action on reading the news of this 5.0 release was to download the Amiga binary, and run it on my old A4000/040 desktop (albeit under WinUAE emulation, the original hardware being somewhere deep, deep in my garage). Yes, I could have just downloaded the native Windows binary but where's the fun in that?
It works perfectly and is just as addictive as I remember.
Thirded.
In terms of communicating information, it's about as efficient as searching the web for "how to do X" and being offered those youtube videos that take 10 minutes HEY GUYS REMEMBER TO LIKE AND SUBSCRIBE to communicate a perfectly simple FIRST A WORD FROM OUR SPONSORS! point that could be explained in 5 lines of text & a diagram.
Bah, ignore me, I am just grumpy today.
I've always felt that a promising TV detective plot device would involve a German witness to a British crime, and hinge on the disparity between how times involving half-hours are expressed in those two languages; "half 8 / halb acht" is interpreted by the former as being 0730, and the latter as 0830...