Re: There's jeans, and then there's jeans......
You may be able to get a suit off the peg. I'm tall and skinny. Anything that fits my waist stops around mid calf. If it fits my legs, it goes 1½ times round my waist.
489 publicly visible posts • joined 11 Feb 2010
Apple have actually shot themselves in both feet with this ridiculous legal venture. For the record, Jobs did not invent the phone, the computer, the mobile phone, the WIMP, the rectangle with rounded corners, the Apple logo or anything else of note. He merely packaged other people's innovations in a beautiful manner, and took all the credit.
The iPhone is desperately in need of a design refresh, and should have had one for the iPhone 5, instead of making do with a stretched version of the previous model. Unfortunately, having sued everyone who makes anything that looks remotely like a phone, there's nothing they can make that won't get them sued in return (which they could probably afford), and banned from importing into the US, which they cannot afford.
I want my employer to give me twice, no ten times the salary, three times the holidays, a penthouse flat on top of the office building, a chauffeur driven limo for work travel, and something a little more sporty for my personal use...
Since when did the wish list for the rank and file influence business buying decisions?
No-one will ever close the gap between what data can be transmitted and what can be used by The Goodies to catch The Baddies. I could happily invent 5 new means of communicating data an hour if someone was prepared to pay me enough to keep me interested in the task.
This is merely a superficially plausible idea for money grabbing & empire building by cops and civil servants (bigger empire=bigger salary & status).
What is really needed is better analysis of readily available data, not more data.
The root cause of this situation is that IT decisions are being made by people who are not qualified to make such decisions, as they have zero understandoing of the consequences (eg Windows for Warships http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/1998/07/13987).
This is exacerbated by the problem most technically gifted people have with communicating with the technically illiterate. Thus the marketing and money men tend to heard more clearly.
There's a difference between having the potential to do something, and actually doing it on a regular basis. Before the iPhone, accessing data on a phone was so complex that almost no one did. Have you ever used WAP? I haven't. The companies that had paid billions for 3G bands were wondering how they could get people to use it. Now they're worrying about running out of bandwidth.
I sell subscriptions to a well known business publication, read mainly by top business people (average income £250,000 pa). I speak to hundreds of them every week. Virtually all of them have an iPad and iPhone. These are the people who make the decisions about what the rest of us use for work. Increasingly, it will be stuff that "just works", which is VERY bad news for MS.
Most readers of the Reg probably NEED some sort of PC to do their work. I certainly do (and for my leisure), but the vast majority of people sitting front of a Windows PC need a small fraction of its power, and none of its complexity.
MS has always acted as if the purpose of an operating system is to suck all the life out of the CPU, so you can't run any non-MS software, unless you invest in extreme hardware, like gaming machines. MS Word on my work 2GHz Core 2 Duo XP machine is slower than Wordstar on my old 12 MHz 286 DOS 3.3 from back in the last millenium.
Because MS refuses to listen to its users, it has never got the insight that guided Apple's boom: for the typical user/consumer, the interface IS the product. Only geeks buy specs and gizmos. WE DO NOT WANT A NEW INTERFACE, and if we did we'd go looking for another product (are you listening at Ubuntu / Gnome / KDE). Ironically only Apple, that great driver of innovation and change has resisted the current lemming-like rush to destroy the desktop that has developed over millions of user-hours.
Windows 8 is a disaster because, to the typical user it's not “Windows”, ie it doesn't work like Windows has done for everyone who is currently a PC user. It's not because people are Luddites, scared of change etc.
20 years on from Tannenbaum's promotion of the microkernal as the new black, I am not aware of any such OS that has made it out of academia. When's the last time anyone heard anything about the GNU Hurd? Everything that isn't Windows is UNIX derived. Meanwhile Linux is taking over the world, apart from the desktop, which is rapidly going out of fashion.
The iPhone is long overdue for a new look. iPhone 5 is sufficiently different for the fanbois to notice, but is same-old to normal people. Big bad Steve would have seen this. The current management are obsessed with keeping ahead of the competition in the features race, something that never bothered Jobs. He knew, as does any salesman, that punters buy benefits, not features. Only the geeks care about the specs.
This is a classic example of why IT Depts are widely hated by users. The purpose of IT is to SERVE the user and the business process, NOT to make life easier for themselves or to worship the God technology and it's commandments. If IT is not serving the business it is as much of an enemy to the company as the competition and the taxman. What do you think the company pays you for? Have you EVER considered this?
When there were more whales, they were probably communicating less noisily, since they were closer to each other. I suspect whales are smarter than rock guitarists, and realise intuitively that trying to make "everything louder than everything else" is a pointless waste of energy. These days they're probably shouting as loud as possible in the hope of proving that they are not alone.
"By removing the need to install a SP" they are probably shooting themselves in the foot. Many knowledgeable users, particularly business users, see the first service pack as a sign that the new release may finally be ready for prime time. That they are issuing updates before the official release, merely confirms Intel's statement that the OS is not finished. This will not cause a rush-to-buy on launch day.
There's a fundamental problem here. As a matter of principle, all UK taxation goes into a common pot. If you introduce another tax, it is simply that, another tax. Which will then increase, and expand its revenue base, every budget. Since when was "Road Fund Tax" spent on funding roads? "National Insurance" is a second income tax. Income tax itself was introduced in 1799, at the rate of 0.8% as a temporary measure to fund the Napoleonic Wars. Etc, etc.
Nokia has not announced any products. It has announced 2 model numbers, and a faked camera demo. When we have full specs, release dates, prices, and fully working demo units we can start thinking about products. Until then it's vapourware. Meanwhile Google is registering close to 1 million phones per day, and Apple goes from strength to even greater strength.
If you want to predict climate x years ahead, first try going backwards x years, and check this against historical data. When you can "predict" backwards with an acceptable degree of accuracy, you then have the basis for going forwards. Until then you are just pissing in the wind.
MS's share price is going nowhere, in spite of huge profits, because the company is stuck with two legacy products, and a load of junk. According to a recent report in the FT, Apple's price has grown at an average of 27% per year for many years.
Balmer throws chairs at his staff: he is not a “people person”.
Of course he's passionate about Microsoft, he's got a billion dollars worth of MS shares that he can't sell because so doing would kill the share price.
Balmer is a one-trick pony who can scare sales people out of their share-ownership-induced comfort zones into actually selling. It takes more than this to make a good CEO.