I wonder if this would work as a commenting system?
Over the last few years it seems like even fairly esoteric articles on the Register attract the dreaded first politically motivated comment, after which we go down the rabbit hole of follow up political discussion. So I was thinking, would it work to come up with a scheme that separates the wheat from the chaff, so to speak? For example, an idea I just came up with (and is therefore likely useless) would be to adopt the following process for responding in the comment section:
1) When you see the first political comment on a technical article, instead of looking up reliable rebuttal references and links, or coming up with a new insult, instead just respond with a standard response, something like this: Title: Absolutely right! Icon: Beer Comment: I am sure that you are 100% correct!
2) Subsequently, if you have read and wish to downvote a political comment, instead of downvoting the political comment itself, instead up-vote (yes) the followup "Absolutely Right!" comment.
3) Conversely, if you wish to upvote the political comment, instead of upvoting the political comment itself, instead down-vote (yes) the followup "Absolutely Right!" comment.
My thinking is this: We regulars then avoid running up the vote totals for the political comment, we can have fun with the inverted scoring, and we can take turns expressing full agreement with even the stupidest political nonsense. After all, nobody can tell sarcasm for sure on the Internet. Of course, if you still feel the need to respond with something serious, then have at it as usual.
Just an idea.