Re: Some HP managerdrone will be smugly looking forward to a bonus for this wheeze
HP's Gerald Ratner moment.
Hope their sales just flatline after this.
1714 publicly visible posts • joined 2 Feb 2010
Nothing they do will have any impact upon governments and militaries using AI because they operate above the law. Foreign countries will just ignore any US ban. The US will not stop developing because foreign countries are. It's the same as those who want to ban atomic bombs. The genie is out of the bag. It's a one way street.
Quit and do something benign and beneficial rather than wasting your lives banging your heads against a brick wall.
quote: Do people still print things?
Yes.
I print invoices, address labels, other paperwork, catalogue pages, proofing copies of books, genealogy documents, photos, recipes and anything else I need a hard copy of.
But not on anything made by HP. Not now, and not in the future.
Still bonus points to them for doing the impossible and making their kit even less attractive, with AI crud.
The brooch was presumably an attempt to do a real version of Star Trek's tap to talk insignia badges. At least they didn't copy the design the way the US 'Space Force' has.
If Americans wouldn't like a tax rise of 1% or 2%, they ain't seen nuthin' yet.
This makes the Republicans the party of (very) high taxation. But the policy of Juche isn't a free ride. Ask a North Korean.
And there is no escaping. If your kit contains so much as a single blob of Chinese solder, the tariffs go on.
Getting stuff through customs may also take a while.
The more JIT your supply chain, the sooner the pain. Once the inventory has gone, the inflationary spiral takes off.
We went through the damage this causes with Brexit. Now it is America's turn. Buckle up.
Tech companies need to start properly adopting projects. That means they hand over cash to pay coders and fund a co-ordinator. But they don't own or manipulate the project. A rule might require companies to do this for a project that is not a competitor of their own products. People 'adopt' Tigers and guide dogs, supporting them. This would be the tech industry version. The tech industry wastes enough money bribing politicians, building gimmicks and failed projects they just cancel and paying their senior executives shocking amounts. They can afford it. The number of projects they support should be a badge of honour.
Another issue is having skills spread too thinly. Too many distros. Too many similar programs. It is a poor use of limited resources.
Maybe more open source in the universities too.
I would actually like to see a new OS developed, much smaller, much simpler, and inherently more secure. Capable of working on major platforms with file compatibility, a browser with plug ins and a development package that would make it easy for independent third parties to assemble customised software from interoperable components. With one (skinnable) distro. Lots of variables to tweak to personalise it, but just the single core distro. The developing out to the components would be paid for by the tech industry. 3rd parties could build their own additional components and plug ins.
My favourites are the screen ones that you would have to have the visual acuity of a raptor to notice. Pay an extra £200 for a 'better' screen, even though it is a physical impossibility for you as a mere human to see any difference.
They are like those trade shows where everyone pays to attend, everyone gets an award to put on their website, and everyone goes home happy.
Widely despised, untrustworthy and prone to failure.
One concern: Are these chatbots capable of contracting for services with Oracle?
Incidentally, 'Unless it's causing serious bother, you can crack on' is not a bad plan for tech. We don't want to go down the road of locking people up or banning tech for what they/it might possibly do. You should have to do something criminal before the old bill come after you.
quote: "can a lawyer sanctioned by the court for citing ficticious cases turn around and sue his or her AI provider for damages?"
Probably not, as the pushers of AI all include terms and conditions in which they point out that their AI is unreliable, experimental, just a bit of fun, well, bollocks really. Or words to that effect. They just don't say that in the adverts. GAFA has been run by lawyers for years, so their small print arse-covering is likely to work better than any of their technology.
Surely escape is preferable.
Amusingly, with the tech sector doing its best to sack as many carbon based lifeforms as it can, Glorious Leaders are pushing STEM subjects, so that students can get a job in the ... drum roll ... tech sector.
You'd think they would co-ordinate their manipulation of society better.
If the US cannot legally spy on their citizens, they can use a five-eyes partner like the UK to do it on their behalf using their snooper's charter. That's how the five members place themselves above their own laws, by each snooping on the citizens of other nations and sharing the data. In the case of the UK, they can legally snoop on their own citizens and on everyone else's using their legislation. So they will be quite busy. I hope we are being paid for all this data filching, as Brexit Britain needs every dollar it can blag.
AI is likely to be a much more expensive version of the Metaverse and NFTs. There is no business case for the investment amounts that have been mooted. Nobody will pay that much extra for tech of questionable value and utility. What is termed 'AI' will find a niche, and LLMs may be used for human/computer interaction, but it is not the gamechanger it is being billed as.
Along with Australia and the EU, the UK is already cracking down on internet/tech access with censorship/surveillance legislation, so investing in tech in these areas may no longer be sensible. Use of tech in the UK may decline, looking ahead, as access to online services and sites is increasingly banned by the state. If you develop here, you should consider an early IP sale to a US company, as much of the next gen of tech may not be reliably legal in these areas on release/maturity.
quote: educated to GCSE standard and demonstrate graduate-level aptitude.
GCSE is school stuff. Then 2 years at college. Then undergraduate for 3 years. Then you are a graduate.
To have graduate level IT aptitude when you have just done your GCSEs would make you an aspie prodigy.
quote: to carry out counter operations against adversaries.
To enforce UK government censorship of porn surfing and web 2.0, shut down critical blogs, and spy on 'Private Eye'. FTFY.
quote: They'll also have to pass each force's health and fitness criteria
Muscular geeks only need apply.
They do need staff. GCHQ were too crap at their job to reassemble Boris's messages for the Covid inquiry, from the other parties, senders and recipients. Or was that perhaps intentional. Surely not. They couldn't be that corrupt could they?
They used to send out the forms. We'd fill them in and send a cheque. It worked. Then they forced us to do it digitally, which works OK if you can actually get past the security. But now it costs them hundreds of millions of quid a year paid to IT companies. I guess that's 'progress'.
If your tech isn't costing you less and making things easier, it is not a benefit and you should stop using it.
Because it is a very large internet. To manually check every page before the ad appeared is not viable, and any other option will allow some incidences where this occurs.
Of course if one fail was enough to get you shut down, we wouldn't have any politicians. That's a pretty good deal. No internet and no politicians.
There is a progressive campaign underway to take full control of the net, ending web 2.0 and other services, especially cross border ones, by governments globally. The UK, which wants back doors in everything, has an internet censorship act kicking in, in July. Others will follow. It is all done under the premise of protecting the children from 'harms' and 'public morality'. The Chinese use the same scam for the same purposes. They are governments, so they will win in the end. Enjoy your internet use whilst you still have it. It will all go soon. It makes you wonder why they are spending so much on AI when there will soon be so much less internet activity. We should be cutting down investment in tech in preparation for the winding down of most internet services.
Instead of fixing the issue, they decided to build a yardstick for it.
It took a year and the pocketing of heaven knows how much money to come up with something that could have been achieved in an afternoon. That's Brexit Britain in a nut shell. Pointless world firsts, we have them! Tremble at our innovation, you foreign Johnnies.
For these guys, it doesn't have to work. Someone else will have to pick up the pieces. It's an American Brexit: Wreck stuff, bank cash, exit stage right before the consequences really hit home.
They seem to have a back-of-a-fag-packet plan of wanting to switch the US from a global power (which does cost a lot of cash, hence the US national debt) to an obese version of Singapore, with a focus on control and revenue. They will engage abroad only if they can profit from it financially (Ukraine's resources) or in acts of vengeance (Iran).
What this does, is offer China a one off opportunity to replace the US on the world stage, if they are willing to pay for it. They wouldn't have been expecting it, and it will be interesting to see if they go for it.
Incidentally, $160bn is a lot of cash for a bloke who basically appeared out of nowhere a few years back. Has anyone ever tracked how Musk made all that cash?
The CIA bank their funds for covert ops in discreet places. Musk and his merry band of data ferrets are likely to be shutting these down as inessential, as they will be disguised as stuff like Feral Rabbit Census, Oklahoma. Miffed CIA folks may not appreciate these 'cost savings'.
It is an expensive additional cost for something with inherent flaws and so offers limited or minimal benefits in most cases.
Just give it up. It got further than the Metaverse and NFTs, but nobody is going to be blowing $500bn on this, because they won't get $500bn and $1 back. Not now. Not ever.
The next big thing may well be a switch back to simpler, less networked tech and paper. Because nobody is going to access, ransom or delete your paper records from Moscow whilst you sleep.
This is the UK. So the government are exempt (ie. above the law). Everyone else is likely to become liable. They will only prosecute the ones they want to - due to lack of staff time/funding as much as anything. It's not about the law, it is about politics and the mechanics of implementation.
If you want to stay safe, end all web 2.0 functionality on your site before this kicks off. Otherwise you may become a crash test dummy for who is and who is not liable. And in the UK, any brush with the legal system will empty your bank account and ruin several years of your life, even if you are not ultimately found guilty. Sometimes you have to accept that the government are in control and can screw with your life if they are minded to. To keep clear blue water between their persecution and yourself, pull back, withdraw services and stay safe. The model for life in the UK today is the same as it was for colonial subjects of the British Empire. Keep your head down and do not invite the wrath of those in charge. Because you won't win.
The Australian government allows its members to use the internet? Haven't they read how dangerous it is? The BBC report on a new internet danger every day. The harms, the risks, the scams, the content, and the hackers. There are even photos of people with their ankles showing. Or worse! To use the internet is a clear risk to national security and public morality. Surely they should be banning anyone in government from using it at all, or their families. Indeed, surely people with children should be banned from using it too, in case their children catch sight of an open web browser and the moral infection spreads to them. Only those living in a house without children should be allowed to use the net as a default baseline, with consideration given to banning it from Australia altogether.
Trash relations with the neighbours. Stir up hate crime with populist bollocks. Trash cross-border trade. Damage the economy. Turbo charge inflation. Fill pockets. Have a good time at everyone else's expense. Walk away rich leaving a broken shell of a country.
The UK should be getting a copyright fee off Trump for this.
And given the restrictions, it hardly counts as a VPN service.
VPNs may be some use as long as they aren't run by the NSA, but there are other options. Widespread deployment of code that allowed users to bounce web data through other sites would allow citizens of oppressive regimes to avoid blocks, whilst creating one or more alt DNS systems would allow data to move across the internet from anywhere to anywhere. This is easier with distributed systems. You can also capture websites and convert them into apps, pipe them as apps across the net or rebuild their functionality on your own system. Websites can even be deployed independent as mobile code.
Data flows like water, we just have to do the plumbing. Development of this was largely frozen by GAFA's dominance, patent abuse and lawyer-led operations, but there is a world of alternate ways to move and process data that we have not yet exploited. A lot of it can operate happily on the current infrastructure, data within data, networks within networks. Plenty to explore.
...on how many members of the emergency services simply use their mobile phones instead.
It is a fine line for the govt. to tread, as there are so few bidders for their outsourced tech projects. If Moto did pull out, they would be screwed. Ditto for all the other projects that are being extended because the replacement is years away for working. Governments have placed themselves over a barrel by endless poor management.
That's what Boris's Brexiteers banked on with Brexit. They are now available on the lecture circuit having been kicked out of power on account of the inflation caused by the decline in Sterling following the referendum. No gains yet. Not one.
As for 'temporary'. I seem to remember economists telling us that inflation was 'temporary', post-Covid. Well, we've had Long Covid and Long Brexit. I guess there is such a thing as Long Temporary.
The reciprocal tariffs were stupid and just hurt Canadians. Having pointed out that tariffs are dumb and damaging, why did they throw up their own? Well, with the governments of the US, Canada and Mexico levying tariffs, the people of the US, Canada and Mexico will suffer and the governments of the US, Canada and Mexico will pull in more tariff cash, which is basically a new tax. So taken together, the tariffs are a state tax grab by all three governments at the expense of citizens.
If you were at work, everyone around you would soon gossip about you if they thought you were a lazy slacker.
This tech is designed to catch those slacking from home. As long as you put in a respectable shift, you will be fine.
If you are doing your job and meeting your commitments, but get hassled for going to the lavvy or answering the door, tell them where to stick their job and take your skills elsewhere. Their business can fail with desperate employees and those who have trained their cats to play with their [computer] mice.
If you are working from home, whilst you are doing it, your home is no longer your private home but your workspace. So accept that your company has access to it. If you want to separate your home and work, you have to actually go to work.