Sorry Cookie old son, your latest mega-multi-core monster device is just a bit overkill for me at the mo.
I think the top-of-the-range mega-multi-core monsters are overkill for almost everyone.
3274 publicly visible posts • joined 30 Jan 2010
I idly looked into FTTP when moving into a new place. At the moment, when you pay for install (If it's available from your exchange), you're paying for the civil works to dig up the street and lay the fibre. Of course, once that's done, anyone downstream of you can use the same ducts at reduced rate :-/
Although the ZX81 had 1KB RAM on board, not all of it was usable by programs. System variables and screen display took up some of that 1K. (If you used the full screen, you'd use 793 bytes of RAM!)
Oh, and that 1K ZX Chess was actually done in 672 bytes - using just over half of the ZX81's RAM.
Source: Wikipedia.
@ werdsmith - I agree with you on the chess front ;-)
I think you're confusing RAID 4, 5 & 6.
RAID 4 has a dedicated parity disc.
RAID 5 has 1 extra disc for storing parity data, but that parity data is spread across all the discs in the RAID group.
RAID 6 has 2 extra discs for storing parity data. Again, that parity data is spread across all the discs.
the cost of calling someone to replace a dead drive far outweighs the price of the disk
Someone's making the wrong comparison. You need to look at the cost of replacing the disc versus the value of the data on the disc. I suspect the disc is tiny in value, compared to that of the data it holds.
Where Oracle is weak is in supplying public cloud providers and web-scale app service suppliers such as Amazon, Facebook and Google
To be fair to Oracle (Not something I'm comfortable doing) IBM, HP, Dell, Cisco, et al probably don't have much traction in that area either. Don't Facebook, Google, and I'm guessing Amazon, cut their own servers?
But wow, I still hate Microsoft browsers, I often wondered if they did it on purpose, in an attempt to get developers to make it work on IE, but break it on others?
Yes they did.
But they also went one better. Their systems browser sniffed and sent CSS/HTML that displayed wrong on other browsers to suggest that IE was the only browser that worked correctly. ( www.theregister.co.uk/2005/02/11/hakon_on_ms_interroperability/ )
Maybe they should give Nasa a call.
I've had several NUMBER NOT AVAILABLE or WITHHELD displays on the phone that turned out to be important calls from hospitals or credit card companies.
The police have this annoying habit too for sending no number - ever. Why can't they at least send their main switchboard number? If it's coming from their main control room, why not get them to send 999 and enforce the telcos so that ONLY the police can send a 999 CLI?
At work I occasionally get calls to trace 999 calls from our system (usually just some Muppet not able to use a fax machine) The police give you bugger all information about themselves and the only way to prove it is the police is to call them back on 101. But they then take ages (15-20 minutes) to answer. And then they don't always recognise the reference they give you. Then they phone you back and complain that you didn't call them back!
The police really don't help themselves, do they?
Every adult using the system will have been thoroughly vetted via a criminal records disclosure check
1 - It hasn't been called CRB for several years. It's now DBS. (Disclosure and Barring Service) Something the Scouts should plainly know.
2 - A clean CRB/DBS check does NOT mean the person is not a ne'er do well. All it means is that the person hasn't been noticed and recorded by the authorities yet. Ian Huntley anyone...?
"We have engaged highly regarded contractors and security experts to ensure that we comply with data protection legislation."
"We are looking to remove the ability for our managers to see data that is not directly relevant to their role"
Someone needs to re-read the basics of UK data protection law: ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/data-protection-principles/ - and fire their consultants.
Proper access control is a fundamental part of data protection and should have been baked in at the drawing board.
A more germane question may be "why would they do that?"--That being effectively force a migration of data and operational profit to "the cloud."
Is this good for the end user? Probably not. Is it good for the financial bottom line? Yes, as it's predicable revenue. Microsoft have learned from XP. People loved it so much they stopped upgrading and so stopped giving MS money.
Look at Adobe who are taking it to the extreme. No more perpetual licenses, instead it's annual subscriptions all the way.
Indeed, with the Charlie Hebdo murderers having been under surveillance that was later discontinued, it seems that we are seeing the rise of Big Brother states which cannot cope with the volumes of information they greedily seek access to.
We reached that years ago. The Americans knew about the Sept 11th terrorists. Same in the UK with the Lee Rigby murder.
This story on the BBC's More Or Less program deals with this exact problem: How to deal with all the information to spooks collect. In it, Stella Rimington (former head of MI5) says that even if they know every terrorist suspect, they can't monitor them all as it would require too much man power.
Another problem (as highlighted by Robin 12 above) is false positives. If you have too much data you're more likely to finger innocent people as terrorists.
The spooks don't need MORE data, they need to work smarter with the smaller amounts of data.
Did Ofcom just order BT to increase their prices to consumers in order to create a bigger gap?
Not quite. OFCOM are saying that the price BT Wholesale sell at mustn't be used to offset any prices by BT Retail. By doing so, other ISPs can't potentially compete with BT Retail so BT Retail gain a monopoly on the super-fast broadband service.
I thought this was already impossible as this was why BT became all these fragmented groups so they couldn't cross-subsidise.
VMWare are in a no-win situation here.
If they leave TPS on, people will say that they're being lax with default security. If they switch it off, people will complain that their servers now need more RAM.
IMHO, VMWare should disable TPS for new installs and for upgrades either leave it on, or ask the admin if they want it switched on or off.
There has been plenty of talk about open-source databases growing faster than those belonging to tech dinosaurs like Oracle..
New open-source database sells one license in year 1, and two licenses in year 2. That's 100% growth in one year.
Oracle sells 1 million licenses in year one, and 1.1 million licenses in year two. Oracle "only" has a 10% growth.
Probably for the same reason Hubble can't see the Apollo landing sites: hubblesite.org/reference_desk/faq/answer.php.cat=topten&id=77.
The best thing about WordPerfect was its Reveal Codes feature. It allowed you to see how all the formatting was structured under the bonnet. This allowed you to troubleshoot formatting problems really easily. You could even move the cursor between the formatting elements to ensure you got what you wanted.
I'm not aware that any word processor supports anything like that any more. And they call it progress....
According to that ever reliable source of Wikipedia, Corel Linux was based off of Debian.
Corel Linux may have been an early commercial distro of Linux, but it certainly wasn't one of the firsts. Debian, which Corel was based off, first came out in 1996. (It was announced in 1993) The earliest distributions came out in 1992. (Linus released his first kernel in 1991)
All details sourced from Wikipedia.
The problem with any programing paradigm is that people like project managers throw the baby out with the bath water. They follow the paradigm too rigidly, instead of letting the users of the paradigm (e.g. coders) adapt to the situation.
There is no universal tool or technique for managing projects of every shape and size. A good manager will adapt/modify techniques to the situation as it develops.
But why wait for a fancy machine to take your precious chocolate* and make it into intricate shapes? Why not just scoff the chocolate instead of putting it into the machine? Chocolate satisfaction in much less time.
* I'm using the word "chocolate" in it's loosest sense here, as we're dealing with Hershey
But it would be nice if you could acknowledge corrections publicly.
Some public recognition would be nice, but I'd say about 75% of the time I, at least, get a reply back saying thank you from a sub-editor. (It would be nice if that was closer to 100%) The public recognition doesn't have to be a name anywhere. Maybe some extra up-votes? If we ask for too much El Reg will think we're biting the hand that bites the hand...
1 - The vCentre server that runs as a Linux appliance has less features and capacity than the full-blown Windows server based vCentre setup.
2 - If you've ever used the vCentre web interface for more than a few moments, you'll realise that it's a horrible piece of (Flash) software. Why they had to write it as Flash rather than HTML/Javascript application is beyond anyone who uses it. It's slow, buggy and klunky.