Re: Idiot
Certainly Curt's prank backfired on him and he seems to have learned from his mistake. I'm not sure we have enough information to determine whether he should be fired or not.
3350 publicly visible posts • joined 30 Jan 2010
1 - Microsoft's recommendation is that any domain accounts with any privileges beyond a bog-standard user account are not synced to Entra via Entra Connect. Conversely, accounts with privileges in Entra are not synced from on-premise Active Directroy.
2 - A little wrinkle with the Entra Connect user ID is that it needs Domain/Global admin permissions when Entra Connect is being setup, but these can be revoked to much lower levels once the service is running. How many people remember to do that final step, I wonder...?
Public Wi-Fi, often unencrypted and easily accessible, provides an ideal entry point for attackers.
To what? It's just to the internet, it's not to a corporate's private internal systems.
Unlike the security of home Wi-Fi, which is password-protected and encrypted, public Wi-Fi leaves users' data exposed to anyone on the network
And that's why IT people have been banging on about using TLS for aeons as you can never trust a network. See: China, Russia, etc.
Yet more scaremongering form someone who should know better.
Exchange is a right pig to administer. Paying Microsoft for Office 365 is genuinely a cheaper & less stressful way to consume Exchange.
And before any smart arse says "Well don't use Exchange" let me introduce you to enterprise integrations that only work with Exchange. I live & work in the real work and that means having to have Exchange.
Can we stop calling this current orgasmic hype-ware AI? It's not AI. It's just a large language statistical model.
AI would imply the software has some form of understanding of what it's dealing with. It doesn't - as it clearly evident by some of the utter rubbish it produces.
Concorde didn't need afterburner to sustain supersonic flight
The key was supercruise. It was a mechanism which adjusted the air flow into the engines based on air speed and density. It required a leap of faith to use modern (for its time) electronics.
Whilst we've certainly learned a lot since Concord(e)'s time, it was nontheless, an amazing piece of technology & engineering.
I'm pretty sure that the Chinese have the capability to reach an orbiting space station
The key word there is "an". They can reach a space station but possiby not the ISS due to the different orbital inclinations between where the ISS is and what China can reach.
And that's before we get to the tiny little issue of American law preventing NASA working with the Chinese.
During the lockdown supply constraints, the Pi Foundation had a difficult choice: Prioritise consumer or business customers? They took the decision to prioritise business customers. It wasn't an easy decision.
We're now out of the lockdown supply constraints and everyone has equal access to devices.
Reading some of the comments here complaining about feature X missing/wrong on the RPi 5, I think people need to take a step back and look at the origins of the RPI. It was designed as a very low cost computer for people/children to tinker with - a bit like the 8-bit home micros of the 80s.
Right from the off, people started using it for things it wasn't designed for and asked for more features & performance.
It's now on its fifth iteration, people are still complaining about features & performance, but now they're complaining about price too because its gone up as they've added features & performance that people asked for.
Project 2025 will make it very hard for Tesla to continue in business in the USA.
I watched a LegalEagle video where they looked at the Project 2025 manifesto. Oh. My. God. The poeple who wrote Project 2025 eriously have learned nothing from 20th century history.
I'm a manager and I know I'm an idiot. When I get new hires, I always tell them to tell me if they think I'm wrong or they have a better idea.
I also seem to have gained a reputation as someone who can solve problems and get things done. (NOTE: *I* don't get things done, my teams get things done)
I wonder if the two things are related?
[NASA] is unwilling to charge Boeing if the contractor fails to meet quality standards.
Can I just clarify something here: Boeing is on a cost plus contract to build this thing. You're telling me that if Boeing don't make what's required, you'll just pay them more to make it right second time and not consider telling Boeing to pay for the mistake themselves? What f**king incentive is there for Boeing to do anything right?
Obligatory Dilbert.
the whole design of Windows is fundamentally flawed with far too many hacks, kludges and compromises that have been left unaddressed, or fudged to 'fix' over the years, and which now are almost impossible to fix without a complete rewrite
To Microsoft, backwards compatibility is almost sacrosanct: This includes supporting software that did very dodgy things (e.g. abusing bugs)
To be fair, this isn't too far different to the policy for the Linux Kernel of "Don't break the user space".
Whilst I'm sure there are things MS could do to minimize the impact of a repeat ClownStrike performance, let's not forget that ClownStrike made two fundamental errors here: No testing of the files before release and no client-side sanity checking of the data before being used in the kernel. If ClownStrike has done ONE of those, we wouldn't be in this mess. (And let's not forget the "Don't deploy on a Friday" either)
Reading some of the analysis by Scott Manley on twitter, he says NASA have already paid for the rocket launch and they're going to put a lump of concrete mass simulator in the rocket. Why not just throw the lander in there untested? If it works, great! If it doesn't, what have you lost? I bet a lot of the cost of the lander isn't the components but the paperwork.
There's an element of truth in what Microsoft say: It's not for them to say whether person A logging into Office 365 with valid credentials is allowed to see the data: That's your job as the tenancy. administrator.
The problem with that line is in this case, the ne'er-do-wells bypassed the normal authentication methods to gain access to Office 365 so MS are most definitely on the hook here.