> This is why I have to dispute your numbers. ;)
I owe you a pint for that!
Yes, I was being generous :P
"At least it's better than TikTok" only goes so far. It is doing its best to be more and more like TikTok.
3170 publicly visible posts • joined 26 Jan 2010
> YouTube's pricing is better than Netflix's and has actually useful content.
YouTube is 1 part useful to 9 parts dross, bilge and bile. It's really not worth paying for IMO.
Some of its videos are "useful" but i'd much rather read an instructional webpage than watch some knobhead witter on about how wonderful he is and trying to plug some shit product he's been paid to promote (in addition to the overt ads) instead of actually teaching me anything about the subject i'm interested in
Then you have the bilge and bilge from the likes of GBN, TalkTV and even worse nutters
And frankly, I refuse to use anybody's recommendation algorithm. They should be paying ME for that.
Personally, I would happily pay the Reg whatever money they are losing out from me blocking their adverts. More if i'm feeling generous after reading a good BOFH (or even better, SFTW)
But that would have to be voluntary, not a penalty for using an adblocker. If you start doing a youtube and start blocking adblockers, or if you put up a paywall, then i'm offski.
There was a Panorama last night about the latest Alzheimer's drugs. They have had a very successful trial and are starting the licensing process. Around 200,000 in the UK would be eligible, but the drug currently costs 20k per patient per year, which is a bit steep but a third of the cost of a care home. To put the drug on the NHS would be 4 Billion/year if they couldn't negotiate a better price, and according to NICE it's not affordable.
But spending 0.5 Billion on an IT system to slurp up medical data for a mere 5% of the UK population (Wales has 3 million out of 70 million people in the UK) is value for money, apparently.
> Oh wait...
Err.. Yeah.
https://www.theregister.com/2024/02/13/infosys_uk_government_contracts/
Couldn't make it up... Crapita, Fujitsu, Infosys.. What next? Give the IT contracts to Randox?
It seems the only qualification needed to win UK government contracts is connection. It's not what you know it's who you know. How many more snouts in the trough? :(
https://regmedia.co.uk/2023/10/16/shutterstock_pompeii_and_vesuvius.jpg
The world does currently have a Pompeiian feel to it.. Or more precisely, like the antique land that Shelley imagined. With various Tech Bros vying for the role of Ozymandias.
Look upon my works, ye mighty, and despair.
There are a few results for 48VHPWR and it does seem as if it was a thing since at least 2021. Maybe it exists in China, but for whatever reason has not been widely adopted.
This page appears to suggest it may be part of the PCIE5 standard
See https://www.fcpowerup.com/3090ti-pcie-5-0-16pin-48v/
third and fourth images down
Perhaps, but the price of the new standard of PSU would eventually come down, since they no longer have to do the rather difficult job of delivering stable, ripple-free power at 12V 80 odd Amps, without any sense wires etc.
There is so much power electronics already on modern motherboards and GPUs, that the responsibility for power conditioning has already shifted away from the PSU. Power for SSDs etc could come from the motherboard, after all they don't draw much more than a USB port. We could dispense with most of the wires on an ATX connector and have a single 48V rail for GPU and CPUs. We could then move to DC supply for IT, and datacentre servers might not need PSU boxes at all, except for a bit of filtering.
ATX is a dinosaur that dates back to 80s IBM boxen..
Bigger? Not necessarily. The current at the (1.7V, 100s of Amps) output is the same, so the biggest parts don't change. The transistors and input capacitors need to be rated for a higher voltage, but they would be not necessarily be bigger. The input side including connectors and wiring can be smaller, due to the lower current. The size of a SMPS usually goes with its power handling, not voltage, not until you get to high voltages >100V at least, where arcing and creepage become a risk.
Government can have highly successful and efficient large scale programmes. See: NASA, CERN, CEGB
Private companies can have efficient and successful programmes too, though I fail to see how they can serve anything but self-interest.
The real problem comes when government does business with private companies and lets them influence its decision making.
I remain skeptical of both sides of the anti vax debate tbh.
The virus had some clear autoimmune effects that may or may not have been engineered. The same antibodies produced in reaction to the vaccine instead of the virus may have had the same effect, worse in people who had bad inflammatory reactions to covid in the first place.
That does NOT mean that any vaccine was ever deliberately harmful.
The virus, on the other hand, has a lot of respectable people (including the i newspaper for example) questioning its origins and suggesting it may have been created deliberately.
But all the 5G microchips nonsense i personally believe was counter-propaganda designed to further discredit and demonise anybody wearing a tinfoil hat suspicious of the government. It may not have started as such, it could have come from 4chan. But big companies like facebook control what goes er, viral.
> How much was the test and trace contract? And how well did it work?
About 22 Billion wasn't it? Of which about 1 billion went to Randox. More billions to other dodgy companies that barely existed pre-pandemic (eyes passim)
Work? It collected a lot of data about us all.. Did it do anything to stop the pandemic though?
Who is the tiger and who is the zoo keeper in your analogy?
I wouldn't class criminal gangs who set up large scale identity frauds as 'innocent wild animals'. Especially not if any of them had any connection whatsoever to the government. Nor could I class the directors of corrupt companies as innocent animals, and some of them definitely DID have government contacts.
Nor would I class the government / police / HMRC as negligent zookeepers who absent-mindedly left the door of the tiger enclosure open.
There was deliberate profiteering at the very top here. The zoo keeper shot and robbed the patrons and blamed the tiger
It wasn't just PPE and other urgent covid related things though, it was all kinds of stuff going through the VIP lane. Multimillion pound IT contracts. Services for prison and probation. Schools contracts.
To hell with all of this anti-corruption malarkey. That's why we left the EU, right?
I've no love for Starmer and his neo-Blairites either, by the way. He just parrots anything the tories say
And to the downvoters: Hanlon's razor breaks when incompetence serves malice.
Who benefited from this? Dodgy company owners, shareholders, directors. Principally tory voters. Not workers. (They did benefit from correctly-administered payments not included in this figure.)
The problem wasn't just that the system was broken, it was that the operators of the system knew it was broken and didn't care. They told their mates that the system was broken and that they could fraudulently claim free money from the magic money tree and they would get away with it. And they largely did.
Replace a small chunk of battery or 'trunk' space with a small* 100kW high speed gas turbine, and leave the electric motor and powertrain the same as the EV model
* gas turbines, the faster they spin, the higher the power density can be. Electric generators need no gearing, any frequency can be rectified to DC and switched to the correct voltage for the battery
Parallel hybrids where the ICE and motor share the same shaft are underpowered as you say. But series hybrids have the power and torque if an EV with the range of an ICE. They are heavy and expensive though, but a pickup doesn't care about that
Surely it's the ones that make bullshit diagnoses that we should be worried about?
Don't insurance companies routinely employ bullshit generators (be they AI, coin toss, tarot, divination, real human psychopath, or otherwise) to determine whether or not they will pay out?
The Reg used to be better than the other sites. I've been here quite a long time now.
One thing that still sets it apart though is its excellent forum, where one can get called a Boring Prat by some Anonymous Coward
https://www.oed.com/search/dictionary/?scope=Entries&q=Enshittification
Do you have a source for the 2MWh figure or have you simply changed the unit?
As it happens, I reckon it IS about 2MWh based on the weight and drop, but I haven't found a source for that.
It was an error, but it was not really your error. Your source The Herald also says "2 Megawatts of Storage", as do other news outlets, so I assume it must have been in the press release.
The complaints here are just a general lament at the media's misuse/conflation of scientific terms, especially power vs energy. It's not just the Reg, it's everyone. But the Reg used to be better.
Wish I could give you more than one upvote.
Apparently, this thing has "1000s of tonnes" of mass according to their webpage. (having been inside a mere 150 tonne crane, I have to say 'yeah, right', but assuming their marketing droids have any decency then it is at least 1000 tonnes.) m g h says that 1 kg m = 9.81 Joules. So 1000 tonnes is 9810 kJ/m and so at 1444m you have 14 GJ = 4 MWh per 1000 tonnes. Probably more like 2MWh after the efficiency of the gearbox and motor
14 GJ = About the same as 3 tonnes of TNT apparently. So your lump of mass is going to turn into 3 times its weight in TNT if you drop it. :D (well, ok, air resistance. But still a bloody great bang. And in an eathquake zone.)
Yes, and the next big crash will be when all the investors have bought into the idea that AI bots can make them unlimited money, and allow them to gamble more and more with no human oversight.
Reminds me of a story from one of my university lecturers years ago.. Some software devs employed by a bank had created the first automated smart learning AI high frequency trading bot. They demoed it to the bankers on the live system, and immediately it started making lots of money. The bankers were impresses but the devs were worried. It kept making more and more money. Too much, too fast. They said perhaps we should switch it off and see what's going on, but the bankers with dollar signs in their eyes said No! Let it run! It's making billions!
Turns out someone had got a sign wrong, and the algorithm was optimising how to lose money as fast as possible, which it found very easy indeed!
Yes. On the one hand it's a tool for consolidating all business into the hands of a wealthy few Davos Men like Warren Buffett.. All your local coffee shops become Starbucks etc.
On the other hand, it's an unregulated casino for cocaine-snorting bankers to gamble with other people's money.
Of course, Warren Buffet still gambles with other people's money.. He just stays off the coke, perhaps.
They take random noise, and then perform an n-dimensional gradient-descent along the 'plausibility' axis. Optionally you can throw in a prompt for it to fit to. So they produce what they are told, in a sense. It's garbage-in, garbage-out.
And yes, there are plenty of automated high frequency trading bots that will produce a positive feedback effect on the markets that they are employed to manipulate. And it is almost certainly possible to design a piece of news that looks innocuous to humans but will send the bots into a frenzy.
FWIW, this is still the Internet, and any of us could be a dog.
What's changed is, if asked to prove that we are or are not a dog, video/audio evidence is no longer sufficient. And thanks to LLMs there's a fair chance that some of us really are dogs bots.
Someone will have an answer, and it will involve increased surveillance and root-of-trust. That someone is probably Microsoft. They would become the Ministry of Truth.
I'm sure they would never, ever, abuse their power as the world's most powerful megacorp, right?
The tape recorder and video camera gave us the "Age of Accountability" where incontrovertible evidence could be produced to expose liars, cheats and criminals
Now, generative AI gives us the Age of Plausible Deniability, where anyone can simply claim that whatever evidence it is must be "fake news", especially if they are powerful enough to be widely believed
Taking a stand against Nazis or Russians is hardly something i would associate with SAP.
Someone once told me that SAP originally started their company by developing a card-index system for Hitler's regime to keep track of ghetto occupants.. No idea if there is any truth to that.
So I don't think SAP cancelled because of Musk's ties to Russia, that would be quite hypocritical. More likely, they cancelled the deal simply because Tesla's build quality and delivery reliability are plummeting, because they are struggling to source the parts from China.
Yep. Who'd'a Thunk it, eh?
The only interesting thing going on here is that apparently all we have to to is drop some buzzwords in to a naff press release, and the poor clueless hacks at El Reg think it must be worth writing a piece about.
Unless Simon Sharwood has actually been sacked and replaced with Simon LLaMa
> Is cooling just on or off?
"Inverter" chillers use variable-frequency drives to vary the power output, these have been common for at least 20 years ...
> Is temperature monitor and cooling adjustment a new thing?
No. Move along.
Why is the reg wasting our time with rubbish like this? There have been lots of interesting recent events that I was hoping the Reg would cover, but alas, nothing.
El Reg is turning into Blocks & Files ...
> Program AI to play these war games with their goal being to not lose a single 'life': To retain the numbers they start with. Then AI might start focusing on alternatives to throwing numbers away in order to 'win'.
Ah, the theme of many a sci-fi.
Usually, it ends with the AI realising that Humans are the problem.. Human beings are a disease, a cancer of this planet. You are a plague, and we… are the cure.”