Re: Telescreens
The part where Orwell was wrong in his prescience is about the size of the telescreens - They would not be on the wall, but in your pocket.
1904 publicly visible posts • joined 26 Jan 2010
@perkele That sucks. You'll need one or five of these.
Cheers for the N900 btw! Best phone ever (except for that one flaw that limited its lifespan and things like the USB connector and SIM holder started coming loose from the PCB - an issue with early lead-free wave-soldering I guess?). Cheers for Maemo the debian-based mobile OS that made it what it was. (Shame when Intel and deadrat joined the party and poisoned it with their bastard Meego)
I loved that phone, from 2009-2015. Last phone ever to have a native Linux OS, X11, apps in .deb format and a C++ compiler on-device. Made a great SSH terminal with its slide-out keyboard and high-res screen. There was even an open-source WhatsApp client for it at the time called Yappari.
Now all we have is a choice of crapple or slurpzilla.
2 years may be a little too far the other way, but 25 years is far too long for a patent.
If all software patents were to be reduced to 10 years, it would solve a lot of problems. The tech development cycle has accelerated since the patent system was conceived (and frankly the whole system is broken) so I would welcome a gradual reduction in patent life until eventually lawyers and corporate-spies reach a new equilibrium.
Meta, Reddit, Twitch's company Amazon, YouTube owner Alphabet, plus Discord and 4Chan (where is TikTok?)
But it seems to me the only ones in this group with a defence are Discord and 4Chan i.e. the ones acting as "plain-old messageboards" without promoting content to er, "like-minded users"?
Reg needs a popcorn icon. Or maybe dry-roasted peanuts.
I once worked in traffic controllers, and I heard stories of street cabinets being left loose or open, only for some drunk to have a slash inside..
A urine stream is full of electrolytes.. 240VAC up the wazzer - Drunk or not, that's not something he'll forget in a hurry!
All that says to me is "spurious-trip hazard".
Safety vs reliability: In reliability engineering, there is no such thing as "fail safe" - only fail.
Monitoring for minute changes in power-line impedance only introduces a new EM-induced failure mode. Never mind a solar flare, you'll be down the next time the arc-welding shop next door starts their shift.
What's more important, your network or the rat that pissed on the cable?
I once heard a story from an old electrical contractor about when he was called to some mansion in the scottish highlands that had its own 11kV substation. He says he had isolated the supply and locked the switchroom to work on the busbars (i guess probably he was on the 400V side) but hadn't reckoned on the janitor having a key, ignoring the sign saying Do Not Operate, and throwing it back on to make his tea.
The contractor was up a ladder with his hands on two different busbars at the time, but survived to tell the tale because apparently he was thrown clear like timmy from Jurassic Park..
Moral of the story: Always lock out with your OWN padlock
Could have been a tall tale of course, but nonetheless instructive
On the other end of the scale, I also knew an electrical engineer who said she wouldn't touch a 12V car battery, "cos its the current that kills you". I didn't argue - never a good idea with that one.
Pretty sure 48V DC can kill too, if you have thin skin and wet hands... Always keep one hand behind your back
I wouldn't want to touch 100V DC, however BS7671:2028 (IET wiring regs 18th ed) says in 414.1.1 (iii) limitation of voltage to 50V AC or 120V DC for SELV/PELV. I would guess this lower than expected limit for AC is because of the capacitance of the epidermis, which is not an issue for DC. I have had a few capacitively-coupled shocks and it stings a bit, but not as bad as being burned by a real shock.
It says it's "touch safe" so I expect it would be 48VDC. 100V at a push.
A 5G radio for a "small cell" shouldn't need much power, right? 100W or so ought to be sufficient? 350V might be needed for a repeater in a 1000km submarine cable, but not for a few metres between a cabinet and a telegraph pole
Nearly choked on my coffee when I read "'digital electricity' allows power to be transmitted on a fibre optic cable" though! The marketing wonks at Vermin Media are either stoned or have been replaced by AI
Never mind budgets, security education seems to have been defenestrated in favour of "trust us, it's easy, install this, do this"
IT died when they let the riff-raff in, without a basic education in what a computer is or does or can do
Manglement thinks the solution is to buy a package from someone like DarkTrace .. which is like paying a cowboy builder to plaster over the cracks
Last time I had one of these I did exactly that and got very annoyed, and built from source. But you're right, of course. Doing so defeats the object of an easy install, but an easy install is highly insecure.
Running in a VM is not a bad approach for most things, but for GPU stuff, there'll be a performance hit if it works at all.
Unless you have a separate GPU dedicated to one particular VM via an IOMMU?
If it were a binary EXE installer (it isn't, it's a text script) then saving it before running it would at least give your AntiVirus a chance to spot something dodgy. But executing a shell directly from a HTTP response is just stupid, and users need to be made to understand just how stupid it is. Yet perversely, this method of installation seems to be gaining ground with a lot of commercial software for Linux.
Well yes of course. I'm sure anyone posting here is aware if what LLMs really are. It just irks me that so many less well educated/informed people are at risk of taking plausibility-optimised random noise as actual truth or fact..
Worse, when vulnerable people are presented with LLM output on the other end of a web chat or phone call, believing it to be another human.. When actually it's a LLM under the supervision of a crime gang, for example. It's like the mythical "demonic mirror". Stare into the thing long enough, and be damned
0/10 for reasoning, logic, or intelligence
It's a box of statistics about text. You expect it to "know" facts? All it "knows" is what word is likely to follow another, in an ocean of mostly human generated text, increasingly polluted by its own fetid excrement
The prompt injections, "guardrails", and other hacks that MS uses to keep their public instance up to to date about things like facts or er, the actual date, are like flakes of glitter on a turd.
"You can't polish a turd.. But you can roll it in glitter!"
Because a local instance has no guardrails or prompt injection, there is no logging of prompts or outputs, no way to slurp data, track usage or abusage.. No way to ban abusive users from the platform
Basically anything that needs to run offline and/or one does not want Microsoft, Google, facebook et al interfering with..
Such as running a large scale scam or a social media botnet, making a cutesy robot companion or a sinister Orwellian robot border guard which automates discrimination/racism/etc.
As with all so-called "AI", there are many uses, but few legitimate ones..
The cynic in me says these companies are releasing locally runnable models to ram the point home to politicians and regulators that the Genie is Out of the Bottle, there is no point trying to regulate their platforms, because the Horse has already Bolted, Pandora's Box is Open etc.
Why anyone would think this is an acceptable way of installing anything is beyond me. Especially in the many cases where sudo is also involved..
Yet it seems so pervasive..
Here, have a reverse shell so you can install it for me, because i'm so bloody lazy
Want some lovely AI magic? Just pipe the contents of this URL directly to your shell and get some AI goodness!
Don't trust us with your shell? You can even check out the install script in your browser if you like. We definitely won't do any HTTP switcheroo when the user-agent is set to 'curl/'
How is poor Microsoft supposed to completely monopolise the market while there is competition at All, eh?
They must be allowed to gobble up ALL of the minnows, before one of those minnows invents something better than their paper tiger duopolist Google (or Hell Forbid, better than OpenAI), because then there would be actual competition and we can't have That, can we!
For a complaints logging database? Nah, just use the lowest-bid contractor for that system that we've been forced to implement but don't actually want ...
We used to have a paper-based system called the cylindrical receptacle, but those scrotes in Whitehall said it wasn't sufficient
Lol. Posting AC as usual...
I bet you a pint that Hydrogen will never contribute 2GW in total in the UK in the next 10 years, never mind their target of 10GW by 2030. I also bet a second pint that storing hundreds of GWh in Hydrogen proves infeasible.
But you'd need to take that mask off to drink it...
Yes, pumped hydro is great in theory, but in practice you need a Very Large Hill (a mountain), with a Very Large Lake at the top. These are rare in nature, and infeasible to build. Not impossible if you already have a nice mountain which isn't designated an Area of Natural Beauty and therefore you can get permission to chop the top off and dig a massive hole in it.. But even then, that gets you Hours, not the Days of storage that you'd need to plug Wind lulls. The efficiency isn't great (though maybe better than fuel cells) but the cost to is going to be in the tens of billions for a GW-scale facility, and it doesn't actually generate electricity.. Better to build a nuke that does?
And still, you have to get the electricity in and out of the facility. The biggest problem with the UK grid IMO is the transmission bottleneck - we can't easily build more pylons because of nimby landowners, and so we are unable to get the electricity out of Scotland when the wind is blowing (so we have to turn on gas plants and French imports, while paying the scots to NOT use their wind) and i'm not sure how storage fixes that problem, since all the feasible storage solutions are very short-term, and even then, storage is not the same as transmission capacity.
The reason that NG were so excited about Hydrogen, is because it could solve some of the Transmission problem. Put electrolysers in Scotland and Fuel Cells in England, and use the existing Gas network to pump it around to where it's needed. You obviously can't do that with stand-alone storage like a stationary battery or pumped hydro plant.. But unfortunately, for reasons of electrochemistry and physics, the Hydrogen plan didn't turn out to be very feasible either.
So, instead we are building HVDC links like they are going out of fashion. Not just between countries/continents, but inside the UK. Priti Patel famously opposed pylons and wanted to build a UK HVDC superhighway instead.. Apparently one can lay a 2GW subsea cable much faster and with less hassle from nimby's, than a traditional AC transmission line. (although it would use far more copper, and be more expensive overall)
What worries me about that plan though is that HVDC is asynchronous - by virtue of being DC - so it exacerbates the already perilous grid-islanding and frequency-instability that could cause a UK-wide blackout - and although we can sort-of fix that with some funky software, they are extremely vulnerable to sudden failure or sabotage.
Subsea AC cables then? Maybe. Although apparently they annoy the fish even more than the DC ones do. And just-as-prone to anchor-dragging etc.
Fuel cells and electrolysers are stuck requiring a hell of a lot of Platinum. There's no way we could go from a few Megawatts installed capacity to Gigawatts (never mind 150-300TWh/y as required by the UK's Future Energy Scenario plans) without exhausting supply of what is already a stonkingly rare and expensive metal.