Re: LinkedIn have always been complete scumbags
This.
How can the EULA be "You are responsible for reviewing all nonsense spewed forth from our bullshit machine" when a) that machine can presumably see "more" source data than you can, b) mangles it in such a way that is completely inscrutable and c) produces an output in a place that you can't necessarily see (e.g. someone else's session).
If user B (a company / recruiter, say) asks "Tell me about Joseph F. Bloggs, what kind of a guy is he, should I hire him?" and the AI says "Joseph F. Bloggs (aka Joe) is a liar, a fraud, nobody likes him, etc etc" then user A (Joe Bloggs) cannot see that he has been defamed by Microsoft's AI and denied employment because of it. But user B (the prospective employer) cannot see all of the info that the "AI" presumably has access to, so cannot review the output either, and may be inclined to blindly trust it.
Ergo, Microsoft is the only entity that can be liable for this bollocks, so their EULA is not worth the bytes it is written on. Any contract containing unfair terms can be ruled invalid in its entirety.