> I doubt they're updating the actual users
You will be updated. Our technological and pathological detritus will be added to your own. Resistance is futile.
3170 publicly visible posts • joined 26 Jan 2010
To back up my statement on the grid: Note that at 6pm tomorrow, the UK grid will have about 500MW spare capacity. That's enough to run an additional 2000 "fast" EV chargers, in the whole of the UK.
I beat you to it, but at least we agree on the statistics :)
I disagree on the relative throughput though. The 300k will definitely NOT all be fast chargers (the electric grid just wouldn't handle 300k fast chargers, for starters), and 5 minutes is a slow petrol pump.
Don't forget also there is extra time because if waiting 30 minutes, you will want to have lunch / a piss / etc, so could end up blocking the charger for longer than it takes to charge.
Apparently, there are 8353 petrol stations in the UK, it doesn't say what the average number of pumps per station are, but i'd hazard a guess at 8, call it 10, so ~80k pumps.
The 300k EV charger figure therefore seems to assume that it takes 3-4 times longer to charge an EV than it does to fill a petrol tank, but I think that might be nonsense, even for the fastest of chargers and batteries. Most of those 300k chargers will be slow ones that take hours.
So in other words yes, I think you are correct that 300k chargers (if they are all working) won't be enough to sustain our current levels of road/car use with 100% EV adoption.
But, there are other reasons why 100% EV adoption will never happen
Well it's the same issue, I expect. The cabinets are made by a 3rd party supplier and the cost would go up to add anything nonstandard. It would be easier to put a standard chargepoint -next to- the box, maybe it would save some money on land/planning approvals, but really the whole thing is a gimmick and there is nothing to be gained by integrating the two unrelated functions into one cabinet.
And indeed, you would need to check the inside of the charging plug for baggies, otherwise there might be an obnoxious-yet-intoxicating smell when you try to charge your EV, and a miffed hoodie standing behind you.
The modern fibre boxes have mains supply, but probably not the 40A or so needed for for EV charging.
But you are quite right: There's no chance in hell of charging from 48V, anyone who thought that they could do that didn't even bother to speak to an Engineer
But, I suspect the real reason this was canned was the engineering effort in rearranging the inside of the cabinet and finding room for an extra EVSE box and meter (many street cabinets are unmetered, but that wouldn't wash with the electric company when you mention adding a big load like an EV charger)
I note in the pictures of the only one they DID install, there is no green cabinet in sight.
I have bought a big packet of super fantastico bubblegum from Bubbleco
I am blowing a really really big bubble but some naughty people keep coming along and poking holes in it, trying to burst my bubble
But luckily, Bubbleco (tm) have brought out a range of sticking-plasters and band-aids that I can stick to my bubble so that it won't burst and I can carry on blowing forever.. right?
Clearly Mr Luckey has been spending most of his CEO-time playing Helldivers 2...
And now he wants to be the first to build an "Automaton factory".. What could go wrong
So make it a "neglectful parenting" offence to allow your kids full access - ISPs should, if they don't already, ask if there are under-18s present at the home, and recommend parental control filters, MAC-whitelisting etc. If you willfully ignore that and allow your kids to access porn sites, then it should be Your fault.
what a great economic strategy!
To make matters worse, the only profits from this will be offshore, and the costs will be very close to home. Hoovering up private data and sending it to the likes of Palantir, slurping up scarce clean water and chucking it out to sea, overloading baseload power supplies, spying on UK citizens, devaluing UK work with an endless stream of autogenerated drivel.. Yay, great idea Sir Kier, i'm sure this will restore confidence in Sterling
I'm surprised that you needed to go to GitHub. Did `apt install konsole` (or indeed through Discover) not work on your Ubuntu box? Doing it that way instead of downloading straight from GitHub would probably be more compliant with the Cyber Security standards that you mentioned.
One of the best things about Debian and it's derivatives such as Ubuntu, is that you DON'T need to download software from untrusted/volatile* sources such as GitHub. It's all ready-packaged and thoroughly tested for you in the apt repository.
* by volatile, I mean that the GitHub version of any piece of software can be updated before it is tested, and "keep all software updated to its latest version" is a lazy mantra which should certainly never be extended to "development" versions.
Konsole also supports unlimited scrollback (I set it to be a very-long fixed-length i.e. 20k lines - I have memory to burn, but I prefer it to be a known quantity that I am burning) and also saving to a file (menu -> save output as) as well as search/highlight within the window
> the Thunderbolt display is gorgeous and I do not wish to replace it.
I don't know if you've tried, but a (Dell) Thunderbolt display worked out-of-the-box for me on Debian/KDE (with both Dell and Lenovo laptops). See this guide for the technically-unconfident, but you shouldn't need it. And i'm using Xorg, NOT Wayland.
> Life is much too short for Debian.
Sad when people say that. There is nothing to sneer at about learning a "powerful" OS that doesn't patronise the user by hiding away its inner workings lest they run away in fear. I expect better from The Register's "OSes" reporter.
> KDE is not a usable desktop, in my not remotely humble opinion. It is a sad ugly travesty of the desktop of one of the worst versions of Windows: Windows 98.
So I see, it's all about the looks for you then. Of course, KDE is highly customisable/themable. My Konsole looks exactly like your GhosTTY - black and borderless, I use the alt key and left/right mousebutton to move/resize it, and shift+left/right to change tabs. That's my preference, but all completely configurable. Or is it just because it has a "Start Menu" you don't like it? You can turn that off too and have it look like a Mac with a launcher bar if you want. Don't dismiss something just because it it is customisable so you have to use a braincell to browse some menus and work out how to customise it. That's your actual Job, isn't it?
BTW you forgot your gimp suit
I agree with you on GNOME though, except the "beautiful" bit. To me, functionality is beauty when it comes to Operating Systems. A computer is a tool, not a gilded mother-of-pearl vanity mirror.
Or maybe time to practice what he preaches and install a new open-source OS on it
May I suggest a firmware-included "netinst" image, selecting none of the "tasksel" package lists, and then installing the packages he actually needs as he needs them
I usually start with "apt install xserver-xorg nvidia-driver kde-plasma-desktop" and that is enough to get from the barebones base system to a usable desktop
Meh. I'll stick with Konsole, thanks.
Nice example of how to make something in Zig, though, but the idea of compile-time code execution gives me the heebie-jeebies a bit. (not that CMake, python etc can't be abused to do nasty things, but it just feels a little bit nondeterministic, in a "never-twice-the-same-binary" kind of a way)
GPU acceleration.. Sounds cool, until i'm trying to squeeze a process into limited VRAM
And it still uses.. GTK.. argh. Next!
Because all three are fantastical distractions from what actually works: Computing, Nuclear Fission, and er, Intelligence.
Fusion is, ironically and despite being "always 50 years away" on Earth, the only one that has proven to be somewhat practical*
And no, I don't think an LLM is going to come up with a useful Quantum Algorithm anytime soon.
* (only if you count Solar power as Fusion. But Earth-bound Fusion fans tend to forget that old Sol has approximately the same power density as a common, garden compost heap, <300W/m3, or much less depending on terms. It's just fucking BIG)
Came to post the same.. Why does an electric car need a "robot brain". Just being electrically powered shouldn't automatically mean that it needs to also be a (remote-controllable) robot.
It would be nice to have a completely non-integrated EV with minimal firmware and without so much as a CAN bus. Actual dedicated wires to the controls. Power steering only if it is not connected to anything else
The sort of thing i'm sure is available as a questionably-road-legal kit-car or, no doubt as a youtube quack project, but it would be nice if someone made a proper one.
Honestly I don't understand how ShiteTube can justify "demonetisation" as a response to a complaint.. It's not de-monetisation, it's Monetisation.. for THEM i.e. they still serve ads, but pocket all of the revenue themselves.
Are they trying to say that the only people allowed to profit from and be complicit in all of the shitty things their ShiteTubers are accused of by other ShitSpuds etc. are.. Themselves?
Spend the money to investigate properly (with actual human employees) and DELETE where appropriate. Don't just take accusation as guilt but pocket the proceeds, dodgy or otherwise, for yourselves. Doing so makes you-- I said it already.
If you think it's bad here, just look at the Netherlands
https://www.raponline.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/RAP-Pato-Netherlands-gridlock-2024.pdf
We are already seeing EV charging stations powered by on-site Diesel gensets.. And "Diesel Farms" dotted around Britain to keep the lights onmake tons of money at the tax/billpayer's expense on the balancing/capacity markets
Datacentre operators doing the same by overprovisioning backup generators and exporting Diesel power..
All in the name of "Net Zero"...
But what did we expect when we bow to NIMBY objections to pylons, nuclear power, even substations are being forced to use expensive-but-compact Gas Insulated Switchgear and underground cables (which are a very daft idea in all but a few cases due to their high capacitance) to hide their presence from local property owners
Just an "Add me directly to the naughty list" as far as any agencies are concerned.
Anyone running a "Large Public VPN service" is sitting on a "goldmine" of data about people who wish to hide their internet activity, for whatever reason..
Of course, someone in a dark suit is going to come along and buy it. It is literally doing half their work for them.
Meanwhile the -real- crims will be using botnet VPNs bouncing off your IP cameras.
Interesting.. If I use idkfa and bring out the rocket launcher, which gibs enemies, it doesn't count towards the total and I can carry on playing.
If I use the shotgun, pistol, chaingun etc then it ends after 3 kills.
Sadly no plasma or BFG, and not sure if I can open the door, since space is mapped to fire
And idclev doesn't work either, for fairly obvious reasons
But when the entire QA team gets replaced by an "Insider Channel" of kool-aid glugging MVPs who pay for the "privelege" (not to mention paying customers beta-testers with forced updates in the "release" channel), and the entire Dev team seems to have been replaced by a demented chatbot, yes that is Enshittification
Er, perhaps, but if you think AI is coming to your rescue on the defensive side, you are sorely mistaken.
AI-based defences are stochastic and will fail a certain percentage of the time. But there are so many exposed attack surfaces to defend, that even if you are good at blocking randomised repeat attacks, chances are that one will get through, and one is enough.
Basically, the inherent randomness/unreliability of the bullshit machines is bad for the defenders but good for the attackers.
So we are entering a world where the only defence is attack, and we all know that this path leads to Mutually Assured Destruction..
The makers of Battlestar Galactica never knew how poignant Bill Adama's message would be..
Maybe because nobody wants to think about the implications of trying to defend against such attacks..
I foresee a fragmented Internet before the end of the decade, and that won't be good for anyone's economy.
The only nations prepared for such a thing are, er..
> On many new laptops and PCs you can't access the UEFI directly once Bitlocker has been enabled, the only way to get into it is through the Windows Bootloader. And they don't allow booting of other drives.
WTF, really?
So if you have borked your Windows bootloader somehow, it's truly bricked? Surely not, there must be -some- workaround.. What if you use Jou(Mytzplyc)'s suggestion and tell Win10 to show the boot menu, presumably then you can access UEFI before boot, including after a BitLocker trip?
Personally I have never in the last 25 years bought a complete Desktop PC, I always just buy the components, so I have never seen this level of evil applied to a desktop. Laptops yes I have seen some evil BIOS shenanigans, but nothing on this level - Even on a Dell XPS15 work laptop I was able to dual-boot Debian by purchasing a second SSD for it, but then again it was running Win10, I refused to have Win11
> there was absolutely no escape. How would you get around that?
There is no way around that, except maybe by suing Microsoft and forcing them to hand over your key, or if you know a friendly policeman, they can use Microsoft's law enforcement portal to request your key. Indeed there have been instances of thieves/stalkers pretending to be government agents in order to get access to that portal, so BitLocker really is worse than useless
If you were setting up encryption on Linux then it would use a local password only, there is no recovery key as such. If you forget the encryption password then you won't get past the boot screen until you either remember it or reinstall
The difference (and problem) with BitLocker is that it doesn't trust the user to set and remember a strong password that is used nowhere else, so it generates one (the recovery key) and writes it down for you (In the TPM module which is programmed to forget it if you install a new PCIe device, change a BIOS setting or look at it cock-eyed, and in Microsoft's cloud)
I'm not sure what you mean by "start again from scratch" but there are certainly ways to migrate a Firefox user profile (history, bookmarks, etc) from Windows to Linux.
I'm a Debian user for the last 20 years, but I wouldn't recommend it to anyone who might describe me as an Anorak ;) it has various derivatives to make it more accessible to Microsoft refugees though.
I hear good things about Mint from new users, so that's why I recommended it. There's also LMDE which is Mint without the Ubuntu stuff, that's what I would install if I wanted to try Mint personally.
I don't know about Gog, but gaming on Linux via Steam is a breeze these days. Just 'apt install steam' and then settings -> compatibility -> "Enable SteamPlay for all titles". I also have hundreds of old (and new) games, and they generally work flawlessly. I even have VR games released for Windows that work perfectly out of the box. No VM required. Maybe Gog has a similar way to make use of Proton? Look up your old games on protondb.com to see if they work.
Your graphics card sounds like a NVidia one, so on Debian this would be: apt install nvidia-driver. Note that for both nvidia and steam you need to have 'non-free' software enabled in your apt config (this doesn't mean you have to pay, it just means closed-source software)
Edit: Maybe try 'minigalaxy'
Package: minigalaxy; Description: Simple GOG Linux client. Allows you to download and play Linux games from the gog.com game store.
Apparently it will also run Windows games via Wine (which is what Proton is based on) and no doubt there is a way to make it use Proton itself.
BitLocker doesn't apply at the hardware level i.e. you can still install Linux on your 'bricked' laptop by simply deleting the encrypted partition. Most Linux installers will guide you through this, and warn you that you are deleting the original OS and all its data (but that's fine because it is unreadable anyway)
It's unclear who lost out, Argos or Lenovo (one of whom has to re-image and flog a new laptop as 'reconditioned'), but certainty not Microsoft who are the real culprits.
BitLocker is a shit experience all round and just makes Microsoft sound like a ransomware gang! Of course they have your key, and would have given it up to any government agency that asked for it.
IMO this is a deliberate strategy, one of many, to 'punish' those who do not want to be forced to use a Microsoft Account.
If you don't want your life on Microsoft's cloud, you should be using Linux. Maybe give Mint a try?