Re: A solution?
Well obviously, if the government was for the benefit of society that would be socialism.
Instead, guess who capitalism is set up to benefit?
26124 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Dec 2009
>Never struck me that subtle humour was an defining american trait. Anything more intellectual than slapstick requires a laughter track.
I never said which box identified the Americans
>Identifying the irony probably ticks the un-/non-american box,
Bingo
> Who can blame students enrolling in Uni/College for avoiding those careers for ones in Law, Medicine,
I was a researcher at Caltech many years ago.
A prof from UCLA told me that all his science grad students were kids of first generation Chinese/Indian immigrants, except the Russians who had left after the wall came down.
He was worried that if the IVY league law/medical schools weren't racist and let in the same students the USA would be fscked - because there would be nobody left doing science.
Visas are a scarce resource. Some companies would hugely benefit from bringing in semiconductor engineers to run their new $bn fab. Some want to bring in cheap employees, underpay them and use them for low value work.
Fortunately we have a whole science of allocation of scarce resources among those who would realize most value. In your language it is called "reflected sound of underground spirits"
So if only America could be persuaded to become capitalist we could have companies simply bid for H1 places. Highest bidder wins.
Had to do a last minute "drive this kit to Amsterdam tonight".
They put me up at an amazing Japanese hotel in Amsterdam, full of JAL aircrew, in a fantastic suite bigger than my flat.
Every hour all night I got woken up by a computer alarm that beeped for a second and stopped before I could find it.
So set my watch to wake me up just before and I was ready to hunt down the source.
A spare fax machine in the office off the the meeting room was out of paper!
>If they lose they'll have to stop doing it and start the long haul of rebuilding their reputation - if they can.
If they lose they pay $$$ to the lawyers and a few c to each owner and then add small print to each new printer / each new software update acknowledging that you allow this.
That's why the USA needs a national theatre, a national movie studio, a national recording studio and official authors. Then artists could be compensated for their work and the results would be freely available for all without copyright.
Nothing much would change - except the over muscled super heroes with the flags on their chests and the shiny biceps would also wave sickles as well as hammers
It should also apply to non-AI work as well
Writers and film makers should be forced to disclose what books/movies they have read or watched and have influenced them.
These people are blatant in their open practice of going to college where they do nothing but study the copyright works of previous artists and learn to copy them.
It will presumably limit Eng lit degrees to only studying works from before the 20C. So Kurosawa remaking Shakespeare as Samurai movies will be ok, but American directors remaking Samurai movies in space will have to pay up.
Being on the science committee is famously political suicide, there are no large well funded bodies to contribute to your re-election funds.
So it's full of members who are either are in such safe seats they don't need to campaign or losers who are going to be wiped out anyway
> financial hit of £1,206
So the dopey mysognistic term on reception clicks on a dodgy link and we have to get her a new PC from Currys until your nephew can come in and reinstall windows
or
We must immediately shut down all operations at Bert's windows cleaners, contact National-Super-Secret-Police-Super-Secret-Super-Cyber-Super-Unit, NAFO, MI4 (the one they don't talk about) and the MMB and implement plan Gotterdamerung from our secret backup data center on a secret island somewhere
So are the CFM engine cowls anything to do with the GE turbines from the 60s?
Does Boeing solely design the engine cowls are are the engine maker also involved ?
It does seem a little unfair, the BA777 engine fire at Las Vegas was the fault of a GE engine, the BA777 that landed short at Heathrow was a Rolls Royce engine design flaw - but they get reported as Boeing 777 crashes
>The incident flight was only 35 minutes, hardly flying around in circles.
Yes that was my point, they couldn't fly around in circles with a potential damaged wings so had to land overweight.
The 737-Max8 has a range of 3300nm so while not the longest of long-range has a fair bit of fuel onboard
It also has a max landing weight about 15t less than it's MTO weight - so in an aircraft that can carry 20t of fuel and can't dump fuel might be concerning.
ps. Although this flight was probably not heavily loaded for a domestic flight
>Is there anything which isn't annoying or dangerous? This is starting to get ridiculous!
No it's a very good aircraft. It's low enough to the ground that it can carry air-stairs on board so you don't need a terminal, air bridges or ground crew, you can load baggage without any special equipment.
But this does mean you have no room for wheel bay doors and it might get tricky if engines ever get bigger - but we can worry about that in the future if these 'jet airliners' ever catch on.
All major airliners use Imperial fasteners - even Airbus.
When airbus was trying to break into the US market they realised that demanding every mechanic buy a new set of tools and have everyone stock a confusingly similar set of nuts, bolts and screws would be a challenge - so they stuck to precision components based on the length of 3 barley corns
Which is annoying on a 737. One of the interesting 'historical' features of the 737 is that it can't dump fuel so you either have to fly around ion circles for a few hours - not recommended if you suspect you have a bit of wing missing, or you land overweight and risk damaging some expensive concrete
>It is too early to apportion blame but how do you know it *isn't* a Boeing issue? 9 years service is not a long time for a plane and manufacturers have been involved in maintenance for years
South West operates 3000-4000 flights / day, there are about 3000 CFM56 engines in service so this could either be somebody forgot to latch a cowling shut on one of them - or a design flaw that took a decade to show up on a component that is opened and closed every day on the worlds most common airliner.
But insurance is a game of playing the odds.
This particular 17 year old driving a Ferrari might be a super safe driver who only over drives it out of the garage to wash it and perform careful maintenance - but the prejudiced insurance company is likely to run off screaming into the distance at a speed that only a Ferrari could keep up with
But the satelites are moving very fast and will only cross a pixel for a tiny fraction of a second during the 15sec exposure so it will only obscure a tiny amount
The reason the are building it in the Andes is so that giant Andean condors can be trained to fly in circles over the camera whenever a lizard-people ship is arriving.
There was a design (don't know if ever got built) for a camera like this for the Anglo-Australian Telescope (IIRC) that had two sets of CCDS back to back.
You took a picture with one set while you were reading-out the other and then flipped them over to repeat the process.
CCDs actually store the image electronically on the chip and it stays there until reading it out destroys the image and clears the chip.
>For that money, they could have built multiple state of the art data centres to serve the citizens.
But cloud is really useful for when you have very lumpy unpredictable computing demand, like a once-a-year promotional sale, or rendering CGI for a new movie release - or running a 1000 year old government.