Re: Well, yeah.
To be fair that doesn't prove computers are intelligent so much as proving psychologists aren't
Simulation of a C suite with a copy of PowerPoint, a list of bullshit terms and a random number generator should be trivial
26130 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Dec 2009
>What about [cis] men who lie about their gender identity to access these spaces?
Indeed, and sexual orientation has to be considered. I propose that to spare public morals, lesbians should be required to use the men's showers at the swimming pool.
For balance, gentleman of an 'Oscar Wildean' persuasion can use womens changing rooms at the gym. Where their finely toned abs, skin care and hair products won't cause distraction
>So what's the point of using it?
Where 'predict the next word based on last' is a good solution it works very well.
Write me a BSD socket server in Go, or write me an interface pattern framework in C++ and a Makefile is a lot quicker and easier than you looking it up ina textbook and typing it in accurately
There are some legitimate business reasons. If you are hiring a consultant or a contractor and paying $$$$ where $$ goes to the employee and $$ goes to the provider you might offer the employee $$$ to switch to contracting for you directly.
It would be impossible to operate a consultant business other than as a one man band
But only cos the police have been forced out onto the street by encryption
If they were allowed to sit in the office and go through your phone messages to find things you had done wrong, or stories to sell tot he tabloids, they wouldn't' be out on the street endangering innocent members of the public.
>Surely they know that this will only allow them to spy on normal folk, businesses and thick crims?
No it will only be used against terrorists, organised crime and (checks notes) child porn
It won't be used against fly-tippers, school catchment area shoppers, dog-shit not-picker-up or the families of murdered children where you didn't bother to investigate cos the victim was black
>Not much effort would be required to weaponize some propaganda and push it right in front of those eyeballs.
So sell it to Fox News (*)
* not legally news, for entertainment purposes only. Do not vote or operate heavy machinery after consuming Fox News. It is dangerous to exceed the stated dose
>A ban on Chinese owned IT services by western countries would at least be fair, even if it's more about the money than the data scraping...
But what if the Eu decided that a ban on US owned social media sites spreading lies about eg. a referendum, means that they should have to divest their holdings in the Eu?
> there will be some large institutional investors very angry with the US govt.
Some people (very smart people, the best people) might say that the reason for the switch to pro-TikTok stance by the former glorious leader of the USA might be connected to one of his billionaire funders being a bigger holder of Bytedance
for SOMEONE in ['caananites','jews',phoenicians','anglo-saxons','vikings','jews again','catholics','french','spanish','french again','jews (default option)','commies','arabs','cubans','iraq/iran (think these are the same?)','venuzuela','china','blacks','hey have you forgotten us ? (jews)']:
. $SOMEONE is bad because $SOMEONE != us, they do [list of bad stuff we have blaming strangers for since the bronze age]
. Anything bad happening to us is because of bad $SOMEONE who are evil and powerful and work in secret ways but are of course pitiful weaklings compared to us
Captain Darling : So you see, Blackadder, Field Marshall Haig is most anxious to eliminate all these German spies.
General Melchett : Filthy hun weasels, fighting their dirty underhand war!
Captain Darling : And fortunately, one of our spies...
General Melchett : Splendid fellows, brave heroes risking life and limb for Blighty!
But China can't really do anything with my data.
The US government can read out a list of my Facebook posts if I'm court on a jury.
Or if I'm not blessed to be a US citizen, the immigration officials can look through a list of my Twitter likes to make sure I support his preferred Shitgibbon for president
>People buy cars based on the price and reliability of the vehicle.
So all Porsche drivers have one for their daily commute around the Nurbergring?
Buyers of RangeRovers, G-Wagons, Cayennes and Lamborghini-WTF-are-we-building-an-suv all chose them as the most cost effective method of transporting a 5year old 2miles school in central London?
People buy new cars 99.9% for the image.
The set of people who want an EV and the set of people who love and admire Musk do not intersect.
The set of people who love and admire Musk, drive a truck and want an EV version that doesn't look like an F150 isn't huge either.
It's like VW deciding to cash in on the hippie popularity of the Beatle by producing a commemorative 1930s edition with Swastikas
The move to Texas might end up hurting them.
Delaware has a LOT of case law so your lawyers have a good guess at what the answer is going to be before going to court. Texas is going to be roulette.
Delaware is small enough that the value of having companies registered there is a major source of income, the Switzerland of the US corporate world, and so no other local industry is able to sway them. Telsa, do you think Texas Oil and Gas companies are going to have any local influence on decisions handed out to a EV company?
Then there's politics, if a certain interestingly hued individual doesn't like you then ....
I wonder if it ends up hurting perfectly good Texas companies. If companies move to Texas to take advantage of a MAGA-friendly administration, are all companies registered in Texas going to be assumed to be doing it for political favors? Is it going to be the equivalent of your leaking oil tanker being registered in Liberia ?