Re: constraining mini-suns
While it's not really comparable to ITER on scale it does have advantage that it can run continuously, unlike a tokamak, which is quite handy for a potential power plant
26124 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Dec 2009
UK was in ITER as part of Euroatom, the Eu is arguing that the UK can only remain by re-joining Euratom rather than becoming a regular member like all the other none-European countries.
This seems a little disingenuous, since one of the reasons for building it in France was that it was suitably politically neutral that, like CERN, you could have members that were effectively at war with each other.
At one point the UK was a vital member since JET (in Oxford) was the only source of Tritium available to anyone outside a couple of weapons labs. Since JET shut down, I'm not sure where they are planning to get the Tritium from
The best solution looks like simply making a magnet so fiendishly complicated that the plasma gets confused trying to escape.
Anyone who has tried to service a fancy German car will appreciate the Wendelstein_7-X
>Zeppelins ended up being filled with hydrogen as the US wouldn't supply the preferred helium.
That's kind of the problem with ITER. Each member country decides which bit they want to build - rather than just paying into a pot like the infrastructure parts of CERN.
There are some cool technologies that everyone wants to develop, so you have more potential makers for these bits than you actually need.
There are other bits that only a country with an advanced weapons program knows how to do, but they don't necessarily want to build those and show what they know.
There are some boring parts that nobody wants to build
To further complicate matters, there are some parts that have to be built on site. If you are eg. a Korean company, whats the politics/economics of building a factory in France and staffing it with Korean workers (and their families?) for 5years to make superconducting coils and then tearing all that down on delivery? Do your workers get French labour protection, do spouses get work permits?
Tokamaks are a dead end when it comes to power generation, this was a Tokamak because it's the only thing we knew how to build on this scale when the project was agreed.
In many ways ITER is the maximally suboptimal setup. It's a massive multi-government operation, but with every government contributing the part that they want to build, not just putting in money.
It's an experiment, but built on power station scale, and to power station regulations.
The best analogy is if in 1930, the world had come together to make intercontinental air travel possible and decided to build a mile long Zeppelin - because that was the safest technology.
Jamming at airports is less of a problem. The receiver (ie the aeroplane) needs to be in view of the jammer, so the jammer would need to be near the friendly airport.
This is different to a battlefield system blasting massive amount of power upward and affecting aircraft 100s of km away because they are 10km high. You could plant a high power jammer in a truck at the end of Heathrow, but you are likely to draw attention to yourself
Aviation GPS precision approach also require an augmentation system broadcasting a much more powerful correction signal. This is meant to give more accuracy but also prevent a valid but spoofed signal sending a plane off course.
That's going to be an issue for Northern Independence as well.
No way are we having those Sheffield dee-dahs setting the standard for t'language, on the otherhand nobody can understand anyone from Dales.
We need Modern Standard Yorkshire or there will be civil war
>A cynical man might think one of the reasons for the original spin-off was to shelter the parent company from potential liability
That's a bit cynical, there was also union busting, pension fund savings and a bit of financial engineering in the free-money era
China is a newly developed economy. They still naively believe that the govt should be involved in resources vital to their national interests.
Once they become a more fully developed modern economy they will realise that these elements must be owned by hedge funds and sovereign wealth funds of other countries.
The choice of EVs is definitely an issue.
Tesla - unreliable + Elon factor
A dozen identical Korean minivan-SUVs that are too big for driving around town
A handful of euro hatchbacks that have an EV version because the Eu/Ca insist on it. But tiny batteries and zero range.
Nissan leaf - the Austin Princess of EVs
>Nobody can live on the profit margin on only 15% of the vehicle
No they live on 10-12% kickback from the finance company and charging $200/hr for dealer servicing to maintain your warranty ($800 to change the cabin air filter and check fluids ? Why thank you BMW)
Trouble with EVs is that you don't do much servicing