So the world's experts on AI
Can't think of a way of making money from AI - other than sell AI services to other companies that can't find a way of making money from AI
Have they thought of doing "chatgpt: how do I make money form AI" ?
26124 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Dec 2009
Of course, all Govt Depts should have their own specialised police
British Transport Police investigate wifi hacks on stations, British Education Police investigate wifi hacks in schools and British Work and Pensions police investigate why your nan's sky box doesn't work
It's owned by a consortium of its customers = the airlines.
So if more investment would make it more efficient then that's a decision for its customers/owners to make. Without the cost being a political decision affecting GDP and the treasury
I assume this frightens politiciant
So company X runs WIFI for WBRCT (Whatever-British-Rail-Is-Called-Today)
But a separate company Y supplies the landing page
And they outsourced management of the landing page server to company Z
But changes to the landing page have to be made by media company SQUIGGLE_NOT_AVAILABLE_IN_UNICODE
And this is cheaper and more secure ?
Imagine if the track, maintenance, signals, locomotives, trains and tickets were all operated by separate companies - it would be total chaos
>Medical profession and religious crowd out there push that people should live to the end at whatever the cost to them, their loved ones etc.
While the same people are happy to send millions of their children to kill themselves over to what degree a S.E. Asian country implements strategic investment in vital national industries.
>They tricky part will be getting the liquid nitrogen. If you can do that, why not use your car as the suicide pod?
We used to carry open 50L tanks of liquid Nitrogen to a telescope inside ancient Fiat Panda hatchbacks.
Until one fell over.
Amazing how fast you can get out of a car when it starts turning into a scene from Terminator 2
"a device that is used solely for suicide contradicts the medical purpose under therapeutic products legislation and cannot be classified as a medical device."
Not sure how you would do the clinical trials for ISO-13485
The device failed because one of the trial participants lived ?
>UNIX, and Linux began life as single-user systems with no thought being given to proper isolation and security
No, if you install bad stuff as a regular user in Unix it is limited to destroying only stuff that you control as a user = your data / pictures / documents / emails / messages
The system level stuff that can be wiped and re-installed from scratch in 5minutes is perfectly safe.
Didn't Microsoft move the graphics subsystem into the kernel - for performance
So MSFT would be responsible for testing/certifying, and understanding, Nvidia's entire GPU stack ?
Sounds like the 737MAX 'commentators' who were proposing that the FAA should be in charge of all aircraft design and manufacture at Boeing
ps. Of course you could move stuff out of the kernel that didn't need to be there - but that's just silly
They tried being less selective - it didn't work out too well.
The problem is the 'F' in FAA. So one side of the house aren't going spend more (cos government spending is communism) and are going to block any spending by the other lot cos that would let them have a political win.
Ironically having ATC privatized in Europe works a lot better for society. If the airlines want better ATC because their spreadsheets say it will save them money on fuel/delays then they can just write a cheque
Number of runways isn't necessarily the metric to worry about.
An airport in the middle east with no weather and 2 runways that only has A380s arriving every 5mins - can handle a lot of passengers
While a west coast airport with wind/storms/fog, local nimbys that demand you can't over fly their mansions at certain times, are surrounded by 4 other airports and 6 military bases and have to handle a mix of business turborpos, 737 and A380s arriving and departing - might have more capacity issues even with a dozen runways
> If these systems are still running today, it is a testament to how well they were designed, built and programmed.
And either somebody originally over-specced them by 10,000% or they are struggling to manage 100x the traffic volume they were built for and we are just lucky that we haven't had any oopsies
They are already ahead of you Wanna watch a movie? Sure! Lemme just park the lounge room
And have 3D views of the inside of your facility, not just the view from the public street, and inside your underground parking. With real time updates of what changed - when a delivery arrives, how busy are your loading docks, when do your employees go home ?
Even without the Asiatic bogey-man of the day - I would be concerned if I were Ford and people were driving Teslas into my plant.
And why it's cheaper to pay 3x as much for a flight returning on a friday rather than paying for a night in a hotel and a cheap weekend flight
Or why it's better to sit on a travel request for 3months and have the approved travel office book a British Aiways flight the day before, rather than an easyJet flight 3months out
Your forgetting the one where the admin console doesn't use KEYMAP and assumes a US keyboard layout - but the login console, and you used special chars
Or the RaspberryPi which asummes a UK keyboard when you enter the hidden-from-view passwd at first boot. Tricky if you are working in the colonies with their weird keyboard customs.
>My guess is that someone therefore thinks that inputting more than 32 characters results in a reduction of entropy, and should be avoided. T
Unlikely given the high professional standards and deep knowledge of cryptographic fundamentals throughout the software industry - especially among web developers
Writing the password down is, in most cases, a good thing - better than just using "Password123!" everywhere
If N. Korean hackers can read the post-it note on my monitor - I have bigger problems than 32 or 64 char limits
I'd argue that a bit of paper stuffed in the back of my phone case is more secure than the Super-secure-corporate-approved authenticator app - that is one buffer overflow form being available to every other Android app in the Play Store, or my bank that quaintly thinks a text message is somehow secure.
"built without Linux, and won't run Android apps. Huawei promotes the OS as offering superior performance and security."
This laptop can't run any software built for any operating system, has no i/o and no network support.
Ironically comes with McAffee pre-installed