Re: Ready, steady, eddy
> the planetary defense community.
I want them to have a really cool logo
And possibly silver lycra suits
26124 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Dec 2009
The telescope isn't going to be rebuilt. No scientist is ever going there again. It's too far out of the way to be a tourist destination.
They presumably need to keep some sort of 'science facility' there to keep the lease/avoid remediation costs
So put up a birdbox and call it a wildlife habitat
The engineers will go back to Japan and sit in their office 12hours a day looking busy for their bosses
Having been 'trained in America' they are now flagged as special little boys for promotion. So all they have to do is not rock the boat and not doing anything wrong for 10years and they are guaranteed the corner office
We put the power button on the bottom so it's functionality wouldn't spoil the pure perfect lines of perfection (said in either a supercilious French accent or a rather sinister Dr Strangelove German)
I would hate to have to find the Fire Alarm button in Apple HQ, you probably have to swipe clockwise 3 times on a glass door
Nigel gave me a drawing that said 18 inches. Now, whether or not he knows the difference between feet and inches is not my problem. I do what I'm told.
But you're not as confused as him are you? I mean, it's not your job to be as confused as Nigel.
Spinal tap, where the stage designer builds a Stonehenge set 18inches high from a sketch by a confused heavy metal band
So your local petrol station sells for £1.35/litre. It pays £1.25/litre to Esso for the petrol. Does it pay 25% on £1.35 income or 25% on (£1.35-£1.25) = 10p profit ?
The Hermes store on Oxford St sells a handbag for £5000, it pays Hermes-France £4999 for the bag. So it pays 25% of £1 .
You could have a tax law which says - don't take the piss you rich thieving bastard (only in Latin) but that's why the tax law isn't written on a Post-It
Because you can always trust code you wrote and compiled yourself
The government would have setup its own, run by leading government appointed executives and staffed by top government employees.
It would have a monopoly on supply to government organizations.
It could even have a 5 year plan for meeting it's production quota
That sounds like something that would unite all wings of US politics
So we've had remakes/reboots of every 80s movie, every 80s TV series and now we're basing movies on USA-only 'educational' computer games.
What's the next 'inspiration' for the 50 somethings who are now in charge of the studios?
DOS 3.2 the movie? A horror series based on getting all the protected mode drivers in the right order in config.sys ?
"This post is hidden from public view because one of its ancestors has been deleted by a moderator."
Certainly remove offensive posts quickly. But deleting them 3 days later and losing a rich seam of classic el'reg sarcastic responses to the USA loons seems a little off.
If I were an American poster I would now insert a long enraged diatribe about 1st amendment and the Deep State.
Instead I shall have a cup of tea. Unless that triggers any of the new readers in Boston
Don't store info you don't need. Ideally don't collect info you don't need, but this is govt.
So check a driving record on hiring but don't store the license on a live system afterwards.
If you need to check SSN don't store it, or store a hash and ask people for it again if you need to verify. And ffs stop assuming knowing your SSN proves identity.
And if you must store data - silio it. The receptionist who clicked on a spam link shouldn't have full access to every field in every database and every file share.
This goes double for bosses, the higher up the tree you are - the less data you NEED direct access to.
Strangely this should have been obvious to high school kids 20 years ago so it's not like this is a "workplace boomers don't understand computers" thing
>I owned a wooden house built pre-1911
How much have the functional requirements for 'single family home' changed since 1911?
Probably less than the requirements for hyperscale data center. Which in 1911 was a room full of women with slates
Surely they would have the easiest job hiring.
Perkins? Do you remember interviewing that new chap that just started working in network security?
No - he just showed up one day, but he's in the HR computer system and on payroll
Excellent....
>provide reasons which would be clear and objective enough to meet such a requirement as to why the unsuccessful ones would be rejected
If you are government or a very visible corporation you already have to do this.
Have had lists of questions to ask, all candidates must be asked the same set of questions, all questions are vetted by HR.
Anything about their life,hobbies or their 'fit' is obviously banned - I've normally managed to get a question about "opensoucre packages you have contributed to" to at least find out if people are actually interested in programming.
>Who's gonna stop them?
The workers.
If company X gets a reputation for fake job ads then the graduating class are going to find out and everyone is going to know.
Result = nobody any good applies for X, so they have to increase salary or rely on hiring 2nd rate candidates, hope for H1b, etc
There was a UK finance software company that was very picky in only doing recruiting fairs at Oxford/Cambridge/Imperial. In the 90s there was a bit of a dip and it cancelled offers to all its graduate intake.
The next year its stalls were a little bare.
Although since its main business was derivatives/high frequency trading systems on mainframes - the writing may have been on the wall anyway