Re: Christian values? By what measure?
I think it's well established that Hashem was of course English, although he moved to America on the Mayflower.
How else would his kid be white ?
21372 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Dec 2009
Celeron was originally the branding if you used certain Intel processors AND Intel's wifi chipset.
The idea was that they couldn't demand CPU customers use their expensive wifi chips cos of monopoly laws, but they could stop computer makers from benefiting from the halo of the wonders of the Celeron brand if they didn't pay up
> Otherwise they'll have to use the generators all the time, which means no real difference
Aircraft generally need 100% of engine power at take-off but much less for cruise.
If you have enough battery to supply 50% of take-off power you can rate the engines for 50% - just enough for cruise. It's also quieter and lower emissions at take off - especially important for city centre airports.
>Their target strike price of $48/MWh is AFAIK higher than what the North Sea is already operating at.
The North Sea is very shallow
The pacific off the California / Washington coast is very deep, and gets deep very fast.
The east coast has shallow seas but has storms and nimbys. The great^4 grandchildren who inherited their ocean front homes from 19C industrial barons strangely don't want their view spoiled.
The tech billionaires in California think the wind turbines look cool, but it's currently slightly expensive to buidl them in 4000m deep water
>"Chip manufacturing, as opposed to hardware use and energy consumption, accounts for most of the carbon output," the report said.
Really? Just for Samsung chips or in general?
The majority of chips by volume are memory flash/dram. The process to make them is going to have to be very energy intensive to cancel out a server running for a decade. You can just think of the energy bill, if a chip costs $1 retail it can't have more $0.1 of energy in its manufacture and you can bet the computer containing the chips is going to use more than "number of chips * $0.1" energy during it's life
> For example, nearly 30 percent of emissions from manufacturing 12-inch wafers are due to PFCs, chemicals, and gases"
That statement doesn't link to the previous one. It's entirely possible that 30% emissions is due to processing chemical steps. But that could still be 1% of the energy to truck the chips to the store or 0.001% of the energy the computer will use during its life
Every last fscking nut and bolt. That's why even bone-yard aircraft coffee machines are worth $$$$$
Any parts supplier that doesn't want permanent bans from the USA at best, and visits from unsympathetic men in acronym-ed windcheaters at worst, is going to be very careful.
They could probably buy scrapped parts from crashed African freight airlines - definitely the sort of thing you want flying over your capital.
> And the lady doing the tests can clearly been seen faking tests because she has to "meet targets"
So that's where Elizabeth Holmes went
>Lets hope they aren't doing the same with the plane tests.
No need to fake the plane tests, just don't do them and don't tell the Feds
>Its not the people of China that are the issue, it's the CCP that we all have an issue with,
Fortunately in a democracy the failings are the fault of the electorate not the leaders
You only need water and electricity to operate a fab
If you can get a tax break for simply building a building, or promising to build a building, or laying out the marker tape for a building and arrange a ribbon and a silver spade for a political photo op.
Presumably NVidia can just render a CEO and politician into a ground breaking ceremony entirely in a GPU
Following privatised space we can have privatised ICBMs. In orbit is a network of fabs, car plants, bank head offices and movie production companies packaged in cube SATs.
On a message from the appropriate stock market they can fire their retro rockets and break ground anywhere on earth in 4minutes
Yes the kit works, the question is whether it's a good public investment.
Essentially give Starlink a guaranteed subsided business to supply certain rural areas with a service that works from day one, but might not be as great in 5years VS run fibre which can be expanded and improved and supply fast service for decades.
It's like for some remote rural areas it might make more sense to pay a local taxi company rather than run a bus, but it wouldn't necessarily be the best thing to give UBER a $Bn instead of building a subway.