Re: Total C-Suite fail
But you agreed to it when you clicked OK on the 300 pages of Microsoft EULA.
You did have your lawyer review the EULA before you clicked OK didn't you ?
26130 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Dec 2009
Wait till you have a vital business service tied to an email address on a domain that you no longer own, because you let it lapse when you found that it was a trademark by your competitor (and you had assumed that if you could get the .com domain for the name you were good)
That's a proper startup enterprise-grade screw up
>Dropping prices is not good for anybody but end users and some companies who do not belong to the big boys.
Current high prices and restricted supply isn't even good for the memory makers long term.
It's a short term windfall which is being eyed by workers and government tax offices, but they can't commit to spending it on building new plants
Once their existing stock is sold at huge profits then they are paying more for wafers against HBM and GPU. Leaving them with the risk of ordering runs for much higher cost parts that might not have a customer next year. And long term will see technology drives to use less memory.
It's like the Iran oil shock, it's great for oil companies while they have stuff in the pipeline (as it were), but they aren't going to be building new rigs on the back of it and it will lead to faster take up of EVs and renewables by their customers.
>Literaly, the first line of my post said that the chinese are NOT selling cheaper. just bringing more volume than what the bigunns are offering.
Then for customers that can buy the stuff, market prices will fall at least in the medium to long term
If they are charging the same as Samsung/Micron there is no value in western companies taking the political, and future supply chain, risk of buying from them
>so just ask Spain for how they'll help shoulder the cost of defense
Defense from ? Russian tank armies rolling across the Pyrenees?
Just like how the USA is protected by its geography, boarded by 2 friendly nations and 2 vast oceans is able to be strategically secure while spending absolutely nothing on defense beyond some coast guard.
Spain is safe from anything except an Imperial France or Andora getting the Q-bomb. It probably doesn't need to spend 5% of GDP on F35s
You have to assume that any technical data has already been supplied to Boeing (who are even now looking for someone who can read)
This is to prevent Airbus's business critial AWS service being shutdown 'for national security reasons' during some sales competition with Boeing
>It's not isomorphic, compilers are formal, deterministic transformations of the code
I'm not sure that's true for all optomising compilers that do statistical analysis of code paths
IIRC it's one of the issues of getting absolute reproducible builds
And similarly is there any reason an LLM can't ensure it produces the same output for the same prompt ?
>Tin men don't have tinman-rights and cannot claim copyright on their output, you see.
Is that also true for compilers ?
LLM: prompt a human types -> LLM generated source code
Compiler: high level language human types -> intermediate code -> randomised by Monte-Carlo reordering optimiser into fast but incomprehensible spaghetti -> binary
Is this a brilliant viral marketing campaign to make you think "hey my shitty Microsoft PC could also fsck up, perhaps I better enable Microsoft Cloudy Backup Surveillance AI with Clippy Services for Workgroups" (or whatever it's called) ?
Or it's a brilliant marketing campaign by Linux
Or is it just a fsck up ?
It's a market opportunity.
"sick of reading non-human prose ?"
Our new AI X-bot will read TPFKAT for you, saving you the wasted time and psychological damage of viewing their AI drivel yourself.
X-bot the electronic monk for the internet generation