Alternatively
You could stop selling silent diesel electric boats to dodgy 3rd world dictatorships?
26106 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Dec 2009
If the value of your app is in the data it can access - the only way to have a business plan is to own the data or have it opensource.
Openstreetmap isn't as good - yet, but if everybody starts using it then it soon will be
If your commercial mapping can be taken away when the supplier signs an exclusive deal - then it's the only safe choice.
The same thing happened recently with Amazon, they cut off a bunch of iPhone apps from accessing their catalogue data,
I paid for a Wii (the wife wanted the fitness game)
Apparently I can't hack this model to play movies because they fixed the loophole.
Why? I don't want to hack it play pirate games - I don't really want to play any games!
But if you let it run XBMC/Mplayer natively I would buy another for the bedroom.
If you let it run skype I would buy one for my parents.
Why aren't the makers building this in?
Are sony afraid of undercuttign their DVD player business?
What are Nintendo afraid of, undercutting BT's international call business ?
Your customers using a post-code makes it much cheaper and easier for you to deliver mail.
So you charge them for the post-code data !
I think I'll try that. It will cost you £6000 for the phone number of our sales dept. that shoudl make us millions of £.
Of course the PO is a monopoly, and it's not like there is any alternate way of sending mail or instantly messaging someone than by printing them out and putting a stamp on them
Obviosuly no objectionable site could exist in Australia, because Australians wouldn't do this sort of thing so all the filth and 'really bad stuff' on the internet comes from abroad.
Since there are only about a dozen cables linking the country to the rest of the uncilivsed world, half an hour with an axe could ensure that Oz could live on in it's own internet purity.
It's not like the rest of the world is going to notice or care.
>If users (as they often do) use the same login credentials for social networking sites and more sensitive accounts
That's the whole point, people use junk passwords for all those sites that insist on a password for no good reason - and keep the secure ones separate for important uses, like er' reg comments.
>100kb a month is nothing.
But it's free. A text message is <128bytes but costs 10p / 25c (on PAYG)
So a kindle can send >100quids worth of free text messages/month - should make it popular with kids
And that's per app not per unit - so you can have a dozen different txting apps installed.
Weren't the bombs in London on the tube and a bus?
Wouldn't it make more sense then to install scanners at all tube stations and on all buses?
Since that will rather slow down loading of passengers so you will need to do some pre-selection. Perhaps a separate door at the back of the bus with a scanner for people with the appropriate skin colour?
But it does record people coming from Northern Ireland to England - while keeping out the Welsh and Scots will probably involve building another dyke and wall.
The tricky bit is keeping those northerners out of the south-east co-prosperity zone. Probably checkpints and some sort of propiska.
So this will stop illegal immigrants - except those that enter illegally.
It will stop people on tourist/student visas working illegally - unless they don't tell their employers.
It will stop terrorism. except those from Northern Ireland or Leeds
So 1.2Bn to count roughly how many people are in the country
Good point about Concorde/Harrier, a better comparison in terms of innovation in design and materials would have been the SR71.
The only really cleaver part of the shuttle is the main engine - which is still an amazing performance even today.
But a simple calculation at the time must have shown they would never get off the ground without the solid boosters. So simply lose the engines and the huge fuel tank and add a couple more boosters and you could build the whole flying brick in a fraction fo the time.
As street transport yes.
Now what about the same technolgy in a wheelchair that can climb curbs but can't fall over?
Or a wheelchair that holds somebody in a standing position so they can live in a normal house and work in a normal office/factory, reach items on shelves etc?
Or a mini forklift that can fit in narrower aisles in a warehouse
>In view of its apparent value (i.e., why it's there in the first place)
Why it was there was to be a money pit.
It was a way of financing Boeing/Rockwell/Lockheed etc when it looked like they would be in trouble at the end of the cold war (and presumably the same for MIG, Sukhoi etc)
It also gave Nasa something to do when they didn't really have a role.
>So if USA / NASA go home and abandon the party, can the rest of the world carry on without them?
Technically yes, politically a bit trickier. The Russians have been making noises that they want to carry on using it.
They could probably make some reasonable claim under maritime law that it was abandoned and so was salvage. Or they could simply have their people in the last crew not leave and be replaced by more Russian crew
.
Since it would probably be considered in rude for the US to deliberately de-orbit it or shoot it down with military personnel of a rival nuclear armed (ex)superpower on board - there will probably be some deal worked out where the Russians are funded by Europe/Japan to 'maintain' it.
The US legally can't use Russian services to get crew to the ISS because they are an axis of evil country (for supporting terrorist cuba).
The UK isn't allowed to spend any money on manned spaceflight.
So having a Brit on the passenger list is a bit tricky for ESA - somehow it has to show that none of the UK's contribution is being used for this guy, while demonstrating to all the other partners that they aren't subsidizing him either.
The ruling comes from an earlier ESA (cough French) plan to build an upowered mini shuttle on top of Ariane - called Hermes. This would allow a couple of european (cough French) astronauts to go into orbit to the greater glory of europe (cough France).
the project was known in the UK aerospace industry as <muppet voice>frogs .. in ... space'
The UK government cynically thought this obviously worthwhile project might be hijacked by other countries (cough France) for political gain and because they didn't trust the scientists to make the correct decisions on the project - they made it illegal to use British funding for manned space flight.
No they are just adding it to a quasi-official list of sites to be blocked by schools, parents etc.
Of course schools don't have to use this list, the teachers can just explain to the Daily Fail why they are letting peado-internet-terrorists have access to the dear sweet little children.
It's like not banning games/movies, you just 'classify' anything you don't like as "XXX evil = only a deviant pervert would watch this" - you aren't a deviant pervert are you?
So you wouldn't be wanting to watch this would you?
>Nine per cent of respondents believe Sir Tim Berners-Lee is the head of MI5.
Damn the secret is out.
>Another five per cent identified Sir Tim as the first British astronaut in space.
You're thinking of Sir Terrence Lambert-Simnel
http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/British_Moon-landing
>Six per cent think phishing is "an angling method used by Eskimos."
Obviously the eskimos moved to Nigeria because the ice melted
>Six per cent believe SaaS (software as a service) was an '80s pop band.
And Kraftwerk is a web framework
>Eleven per cent couldn't name a single social-networking website.
Good - thats a big vote for the inteligence of the British public,
>Three per cent identified Bill Gates as an American comedian.
It's just sysadmins don't get the joke.
>Firstly I would argue that e-books are non-essential
All e-books just because they are electronic?
So a nursing manual as an e-book is non essential but a Jeffery Archer on paper is?
Or do we setup a dept to go through each book deciding if its essential or not?
The 'essential' test was the result of an early test case which greatly expanded VAT's reach. It is easier to include something in the VAT rules by showing it is not essential than it is to force something to have VAT by proving its a 'luxury'.
Inadmissible in court- only counts if it goes to court , if it only goes as far as a hood being put over your head and you being bundled onto a plane to pakistan/syria/etc then it doesn't really matter.
Of course that would only happen to terrorists, it could never be used against anti-war protesters, striking miners or anyone else.
Vista was over hyped (winfs, .Net based OS?) ,had poor driver support , UAC confused or annoyed people and a lot of apps didn't work - not all of that was MS's fault.
They allowed Intel and others to certify HW as Vista capable and showed wizzy desktop animations when the HW was barely capable of running the basic mode - that was their fault.
If all MS did was turn off some of the toy desktop gadgets and wait a few years for apps and graphics (especuially on laptops) to catch up - then you could just rebadged Vista now and it would be a success. Some claim thats all they have done.
It's a trick.
These are supposed to be highly skilled, high value workers (plus footballers), so if any of them can take time off to visit one of the border agency passport service offices (in delightfull places like Peterbrough) rather than fork out £8 they are obviously not high enough value and can be deported!
ps. If you think the other lot are going to get rid of a central database that links everything everybody does to the taxman. They might get rid of the id card (or just rename it) - but it's HMG getting informed everytime you buy anything, visit anywhere or pick your nose that is the real problem.
Politics aside, how exactly did Airbus manage to screw up a simple transport aircraft?
It's not like the Eurofighter (make it a fighter, no make it a carrier plane, now don't now make it a bomber, now make it ....) .
If you can build the A380 how hard is it to make basically a modern copy of a C130 ?
Ok the engines are complicated, but come on !!