Re: Yes, but was this reported by inside sources that have been reliable in the past??
It was a man that works down the chip shop.
He also swears he's Elvis
26124 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Dec 2009
And all the commercial partner would have to do is ensure that an equal proportion of each component was built in all contributing countries and that the first crew were French.
If you think Nasa is a bureaucratic bunch of pork-barrelled politicians you haven't worked on anything with ESA
Indeed, requiring a warrant before you spy on your own citizens. Ridiculous, they'll be wanting trials before the sentence next.
The whole point of having the right to bear arms is so that the government can have the right to enter your property whenever it wants.
1G used analogue variation in power to transmit calls
2G used digital signals to transmit calls
3G used IP packets to transmit data
4G used vague handwaving to transmit marketing bullshit
5G will use nuclear physics to actually manipulate inter-atomic bonds to send data at almost the speed of light between copper atoms. Billions of these copper atoms will be contained in a new atomic metalic fibre only slightly thicker than an optical fibre and be connected directly to each handset in what the makers a re calling cord-to-handset technology.
Out here in the colonies, I'm 10km from the center of a city of 2M people that is allegedly the high tech hub of the country.
I pay $35 for ADSL 5Mb down / 0.5Mb Up and achieve exactly half that.
I could pay $70 for cable and get 15 Mb down / 0.5Mb up
For "cultural and security reasons" we are limited to a choice of one telco and one cable company.
How did they know the Swedish accents were authentic?
Because they sounded like the chef in the muppets or because they sounded like the plumber in the movie they watched in the 70s?
I think the Swedish academy of science might need to look at a more secure authentication program.
Although First Direct having it's call centre in Leeds was a good test. Unless nigerian scammers have learn't t'tak proper like wot ar do sithee.
So apart from wasting $billions subsidizing Boeing to make up for the end of the cold war, being used as an excuse to spend more $billions keeping the Shuttle flying to keep a few senators with Nasa facilities happy - the ISS serves no useful purpose.
And we now have the problem that having the ISS there, restricts the flight paths of commercial sat launches.
What data will you collect = that's classified.
How will data be stored = that's classified.
How will data be retrieved = that's classified.
How ill data be backed up = that's classified.
I would do this for £1.5bn - leave the cash behind the tree in the usual place and never contact me again
I thought it meant:
Article 10: Freedom of Expression
(1) Everyone has the right of freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without inference by public authority and regardless of frontiers. This Article shall not prevent States from requiring the licensing of broadcasting, television or cinema enterprises.
I thought it was a new labour trick to use technical legislation to get around the human rights act, looks like this lot have learned from them.
There are a lot of clever engineers inventing clever CPUs that ended up doing nothing in the market - the Transputer, the Transmeta, Intel i860. We spend most of the 90s fending off salesmen from the latest "direct compile into hardware will solve all your problems" outfit.
If you want to encourage hobbyist programmers into parralel computing then an Amazon account on a Tesla is better than a $99 homebrew board
> There are up to hundreds of people on these planes.
There are 1000s of people on cruise ships.
The titanic was sunk by an iceberg
An iceberg is like an icecube (*)
So we must ban ice cubes - won't somebody think of the children - you can't be too careful
( - well more like an ice cube than a 1mW laser pointer is like a megawatt airborne laser)
It stopped the Canadian Radarsat-2 being launched from the US - so it was launched form Kazakstan (no I don't understand that either)
There was also a european communications satelite that was banned from being launched in China because it contained US tech. Instead the makers helped the chinese set up their own satelite building business using their own technology.
And how long does the expertise last if you stop doing the manufacturing?
Then you stop doing the R+D, then you stop doing the basic research.
So the UK stops making TV/computers/etc , but that doesn't matter because the inventors are still British - it doesn't matter where they are made.
Then a few years later how many TV/computer/etc designers do you have?
How long would British expertise in jet engines/radar, last if BAe moved all manufacturing abroad?
> no software patents (copyright covers these adequately)
Not always, it's a little more complicated than; software patent = evil
If you build a mechanical analogue computer for predicting tides you can patent that (well you could in 1872)
Now if you implement the same thing in analogue electronics you can patent that (in the 1930s)
Convert it to a single IC - still your invention and protected
What if you implemented the circuit on an FPGA - is that software?
Copyright only protects your specific FPGA code
If I took your analogue circuit and implemented it in my own FPGA in a clean room I haven't violated copyright - although I would have violated a software patent on your implementation.
So why should patents protect an idea implemented in brass gear wheels but not one implemented on a computer?
The kill switch is there to protect the market from it's user.
If an algorithm war between two faulty bits of software drove the price of Apple down to zero then Apple might respond by moving it's listing to a different stock exchange - the exchange would like to avoid that.
Remember the market doesn't care about the traders or the listed companies as such - it just wants things to work so people keep using it.
>As it is, Noble and Green are ambassadors for British engineering
So following on from strapping a scrap jet engine from a 1950s fighter into a car, they are now strapping a scrap rocket engine from a 1960s SAM into a car.
And this is supposed to how there is a future in engineer? Or just that we have a lot of scrap lying around from we actually did engineering?
Market saturation - perhaps?
There is a limited number of people who can shell out $699 for a tablet.
Assuming all those who can, already have an iPad then all the future sales will go to Android.
Of course this doesn't really matter for Apple - Porsche do very nicely with a tiny market share compared to VW