Re: Their deaths
Yes - our argument has always been about which "creator"
Having visited some areas of the south, we beleive it must have been Cthullu
26124 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Dec 2009
That's the nice thing about these cases - even if it never goes to trial you can bankrupt the person with legal bills, they lose their business because you impounded everything electronic they own for 3years, and then after it's all dropped they are still on your system as a "suspected whatever" so get refused any sort of job that needs a police check.
Actually bothering to have a trial and a conviction is almost unnecessary
His views on women were a bit 1920s ! But so are those of the majority of churches and yet we let them carry on.
Having spoken to other people who knew him professionally - I don't think racist is fair. Just very anti-european, specifically anti-German. And anti- the hypocracy that we must have a race relations act, saying you can't say anything about race - championed by a succession of governments who are all rich white eton-educated anglicans.
SMS will often get through when there is almost no signal
There have been lots of cases where people have been rescued from the local mountains here or from boats where they couldn't get a phone signal. But since 911 can't do SMS they have had to text a friend and ask them to call 911
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/indonesia/1322755/Girl-in-Bali-sends-text-message-SOS.html
Because in 2006 picking ARM meant using a processor for cell phones with that weird Linux stuff to run our business? That sounds like a career limiting risky move.
Today using an Arm and Linux means getting off that legacy COBOL-era Wintel platform into the bright new dawn of Android, iThingy, Cloudy goodness makes me look like a cutting edge dynamic thrusting rockstar.
But 80% of those are low end Android2.3 used as web browsers so the kids don't take your laptop.
Android tablets have really taken netbook customers
For 'real' work a tablet with a keyboard replaces a laptop and Windows8 is quite nice on a surface - bloody terrible on a desktop - but very nice on a surface
It absolutely makes sense from an energy point of view.
Instead of accelerating the vehicle through the dense lower atmosphere at huge speed/cost you gently lift it high enough for the second stage to work.
You also get to choose your launch position depending on what orbit you want - that's why the mothership has such large range.
The downside is the limited size/mass of the payload, mounting it so that it's safely held horizontally under gravity and then vertically under thrust and the extra complexity of the parent aircraft and it's crew
"If you don't compare to a reference copy, how do you know that it is the proper GPL license and not one that has a "now we own your first born" clause?"
No because then the contract would be a lie, if it says GL2 then the real GPL2 is what you are agreeing to.
Otherwise it would be like faking a banknote and saying that the other person accepted it so its OK
Many countries have no pubic domain - it's intended to protect authors.
With public domain you can always just take some work and say: "I thought it was public domain", where there is none you have to at least show some understanding that it did have an author - even if their rights have lapsed.
It's equivalent to compulsory voting - it seems pointless but makes it harder to prevent people exercising their rights.
Except outside Iran. In the USA and UK it would resolve to the american version, in Turkey it would resolve to the Iranian one, in France it would resolve to the Iranian or USA one depending on the last row between their presidents.
Imagine if all international phone numbers depended on who was currently having a diplomatic row with who
The USA owns the domain name registry. So it could decide tomorrow to hand over all Iran's URLs to some American outfit - like it did with Iraq's. Then of course Iran would set up it's own root DNS so which site you got would depend on whose root DNS your ISP prefered. Then it would do the same for all those other axis-of-evil countries, and probably France.
The ITU was setup so that country's phone (and telegraph) systems would talk to each other. Suppose BT decided that instead of +98 being the country code for Iran it would use 98 for premium rate chat lines, France could decide to use +44 to give it some extra numbers.