Re: Counterterror fail
If the purpose of this was to catch terrorists that would be true.
If the purpose of this is to have some dirt on everybody - just in case - then the more data the better
26111 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Dec 2009
>But spying on the citizens of your allies OK then?
That was the origin of the UKUSA agreement.
US president Hoover's swore that he wouldn't spy on Americans "Gentlemen don't read other gentlemen's mail.". Unlike Mr Obama didn't have his fingers crossed. So he got the Brits to intercept US mail and read it and he did the same for them.
A more refined form of lying for a more civilized age.
“The unauthorised disclosure of a top-secret US court document threatens potentially long-lasting and irreversible harm to our ability to identify and respond to the many threats facing our nation,”
No it doesn't - it tells potential terrorists that they will be immediately detected by the all seeing eye of the NSA and so they shouldn't try anything.
It's like claiming that leaking the existence of American nuclear weapons to the USSR put America at risk.
Check your small print - it used to be that if the DSS decided that a claim was invalid/fraudulent they came after you for all the rent you had been paid. If you didn't pay up they seized the property.
So you had full retrospective liability for a benefit claim that you weren't allowed to know any details of - try getting insurance against that!
"That would be for a court to decide. They're the only people empowered to make decisions on what is or isn't legal."
They would do the ASBO trick. The material on the list wouldn't have to be proved illegal - circumventing the list to access these sites would itself be illegal, even if the site was on the list by accident
One of the first prosecution under the UK's data protection act was a senior police officer who saw a car parked outside his house had the owner traced and then beat up the man who was knocking off his wife. He got off because he didn't know how to use the computer so had a WPC do the actual typing.
We then had our own PATRIOT act to stop international terrorism. One of it's first uses was by local councils asking fro cell phone location tracking so they could detect people not picking up dog crap. Then they launched total surveilance programs on people who were living outside the catchement area trying to send their kids to a good school.
Electric cars could be the savior of the electricity grid - especially in developing countries with poor infrastructure (like the USA).
You have coal plants which you can't adjust and a massive demand during the day for AC (which you can't meet) and no demand at night (which destabilises your grid).
Having a million UPS distributed across California hooked up to smart meters could save billions on having to build super high capacity DC links like Germany is having to do now it got rid of its nukes.
You don't even need to spend the money on roads. There was a study that claimed the increase in driving due to hijack fears/security hassles already upped the death toll significantly.
The more worrying one is the increase in food contamination/poisoning since the food safety inspectors came under DHS and were reassigned from checking food plants to searching for terrorists.
> My comment is based on the fact that it's annoying not being able to make a cup of tea in a hotel room. And I'm British, dammit.
I believe that this is a major part of the US defence (no spellchecker it shouldn't be "s") against a British counter revolution. The right to bear arms and the requirement to drink coffee.
Sinking merchant shipping without warning was one of the war crimes Admiral Dönitz was charged with at Nuremberg. So unless your homing torpedoes can stop, put up their country's flag, wait for the crew to get into lifeboats and then sink the ship - you might be in trouble.
Unless of course you are on the winning side!
Exactly - a cruise missile is just a naval bombardment on steroids
This is a remote install minefield.
Send a drone to loiter over an enemy camp (or wedding party, or village in Gaza). It's programmed to shoot/missile/bomb any target (or women collecting water) that appears on the street
At the end of the news cycle you move the drones to the next village.
The civil servants have a choice, publish each banned site along with the reasons and be prepared to justify it in court, or at least in the media when you 'accidentally' ban a breastfeeding site or a rape survivors charity.
Or keep everything secret and face no risk whatsoever
The navy has been doing rather badly in the war on terror.
It's difficult to show that building another 12 carrier battle fleets will substantially reduce the risk form Al Queda
They really need a distant enemy - and a pacific one is best for the publicity photos.
If you could persuade the Chinese to steal the plans for the F35 and then spend $$Bn building a pointless fleet of air superiority fighters while at the same time devaluing their own R&D and distracting their manufacturing from developing it's own high tech products you could destroy their entire economic and political system.
Worked on the other lot.
It's not the pricing - it's what Apple singapore (or Apple Ireland) does.
They claimed to the US that Apple Singapore is a real company that markets and sells apple computers, buys Apple products at wholesale from the US, runs it's own operations and makes it's own profits and so all the profits made by Apple Singapore don't go back to the US and don't get taxed.
If in fact Apple Singapore is simply a brass plaque on a wall somewhere and Apple US make all the decisions and sales it' s a little harder to claim that all the profit should be taxed in Singapore or Ireland
For reasons I completely fail to understand - most of the component makers have deals with the laptops where the official drivers are locked out.
I bought some very expensive Asus laptops for work which had out of date graphics drivers. But the NVidia official ones wouldn't load. There was actually a deliberately coded check - something like "you must use manufacturer supported drivers with this product"
No it's a reference Intel H61 motherboard design, basically the same as the Shuttle DS61/HS61 which works perfectly out of the box with Linux.
The only issue might be the mini-PCI wifi card. The model fitted will probably depends on your region and how picky your local FCC is. But linux can use the windows driver stubs now for most of the proprietry cards
Not necessarily. The point of money is to turn it into goods and services.
I might be quite happy to have some part of my wealth in a form that I can convert into books/music/computers/airline tickets etc without it ever being changed into dollar/euros or pounds
It used to be a common trick here in the frozen north. You contract for a US company but are resident in Canada and pay taxes in Canada on any money your bring back. Of course any money you leave in your US bank account and then use your US visa card to buy groceries in Canada doesn't get taxed. Just an unofficial version of the Jimmy Carr scheme
"best interests of the shareholders" is different from minimize tax this year.
If the result of these tax games was a ban on government contracts, a monopolies commission investigation into your advertising business or a boycott of your coffee shops by consumers - then your shareholders might decide that you haven't done your best fiduciary duty.
If maximum profit was the only driver then drug smuggling would seem to be the best business plan. A few of your employees might end up in Singapore jails but the shareholders would do very nicely.