Re: graphics capabilities needed to customize dashboard displays
It can do real-time FEA modelling of the deformation of your car as it hits the one in front - because you were playing with all the toys instead of watching where you are driving.
26130 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Dec 2009
>Laptops are portable and self contained. A NUC is none of those things.
The majority of home laptops never leave the house
People buy them because they can surf/netflix/email from the couch and don't want either a desk in the living room, or a bunch of cables on the dinner table or have a flat with no room for either.
But to fake the moon landings and keep the conspiracy a secret for 40years is a much more impressive achievement than simply building a bigger V2 and shooting it at the moon.
It's people like you who don't believe our government capable of such an audacious plan that bring the country down.
Buying a company for its userbase or technology I understand. Rolling it into your own product and killing off the separate offering or starting to charge for it - makes sense.
But buying a company merely to shut down its service and then offer no alternative of your own seems like its designed only to piss off the users ?
Because their salesforce know how to make corporate sales, corporate sales are easy.
If some bank wanted 10,000s identical tablets with an ongoing service contract and consultancy HP would be all over it.
Need to make an innovative mobile product for a discerning yoof audience? That's trickier - so what you do is buy an innovative dynamic company and then roll it into HP - and let the enterpise sales people run it.
When this fails - just repeat with another company.
>Only infantry can take and hold ground.
Outsourcing.
Your smart drone knife missiles take the ground then you send in a bunch of 3rd world cannon fodder managed by "security consultants "- no need to waste any white boys.
It used to be you needed an empire (or a religious banner) to recruit a source of expendables - now you can just buy them from whichever country currently has more teenager boys than dollars
Growing up to become politicians
Imagine if camera phones had been around 20years ago, you now wouldn't be able to open your email without the risk of seeing some image of Cameron or Boris putting their wedding tackle somewhere 'hilarious' .
T' internet will collapse from the horror
So who is the person responsible?
The secretary who posted a CD to another dept?
The case manager who didn't check that the secretary followed ISO 2001:1138 section 56 part 54 when preparing data?
The BOFH who allowed secretaries access to CD writers?
The CTO who allowed the dept to install such a crap system?
The previous minister who ordered a system which couldn't talk securely to the other dept?
Safest thing is to never send anything, so the school never mentions to social services that they haven't seen the little girl for a couple of weeks - that way nobody will get into trouble for improper transfer of information - and the papers will blame the parents when they find the body
> Secondly, how do you think "martyrdom" of so many senior commanders of Taliban in Pakistan and Afghanistan was facilitated?
By real inteligence work, not stopping little old Canadian ladies flying to Florida to go on a cruise - because you had hacked her Canadian medical records and found she had once been treated for depression
HP is a vanity project by a departing executive that costs 2.5x as much to build as it sells for.
EMC is a simple reliable product designed by one the greatest auto engineers, was built in vast numbers for half a century and is so loved by its owners even decades after it finished that a new rendition became a best seller?
offtopic; An American management consultant gave us a pitch in which they asked if we wanted to be a "Cadillac or VW sort of company". Much to their confusion we all agreed we wanted to be VW.
ie. A globally successful engineering led outfit, not an overweight wallowing piece of old fashioned junk driven by little old ladies.
>Car makers can't enforce "only at authorised garages" for their servicing
No but they don't have to give away copies of their software. So if they decided that the engine management software needed to reside in the oil filter then anybody would be free to make and fit an oil filter - it's just that only theirs would allow the car to start. It would only be illegal if they did it deliberately to restrict servicing to them.
>"servicing" of a server must include firmware updates when the service engineer installs new hardware??
If HP claim that the updates are upgrades - ie a continuing process of improvement and support for new features then it's perfectly reasonable that they only give them to paying customers.
Its like Microsoft giving you service packs but charging for new versions - there is no law saying what is a service pack vs. what is a new product
Limiting free fixes to products in-warranty or in a service contract is probably OK.
You could argue that the firmware update is fixing a flaw in manufacturing and so is equivalent to a product recall - but you would have a job claiming that the server wasn't fit for purpose if you had used it for its entire warranty period.
It is definitely illegal to prevent other people servicing your equipment or offering replacement parts. But the plug-compatible laws are a bit out of date when it comes to your firmware.
I imagine Europe's car makers are watching the case with interest. If HP are allowed to block replacement parts which aren't recognised by HP firmware - yet you aren't allowed to modify HP's firmware - then I'm sure BMW/MB/VW are going to find a reason why their oil filters need to talk to their engine management system.
The very corporate funded ICANN wants to invent lots of new domain names so you can be www.sony
Organisations like Nato point out that if people try and register .nato as a new business Nato will have to go around and drop a big pile of "peacekeeping" on them.
So wouldn't it be better if ICANN announce that you can't register .nato, .un, .red-cross etc
Because parents don't have the technical ability to know that website X has to be blocked because its parent company competes with one of BT's strategic partners in a different business area.
Over here one of the countries big 3 telcos (we can only have a cartel of domestic carriers for security and cultural reasons) decided to block the website of the union it was in dispute with - for all it's customers.
Bizarrely they didn't seem to think anyone would be annoyed, or that it would be news!
No RSA can't be held liable for being ordered by a secret court to do as it was told - just like Huawei can't be held liable in China for doing the same thing.
But all RSA's foreign customers can now decide that it is about as trustworthy as Huawei and be about as likely to use if to for important stuff. Its US customers will ask themselves if secured by RSA now means - "copied to the IRS" and every other government agency.
But following on from more than a decade of fighting strong encryption products like PGP, weakening existing standards and secretly reducing the key length in commercial products exported.
You would have to be very niave and very out of touch not to be suspicious.
Although it is possible that all the world class security experts at RSA never use the internet, or read the newspapers or watch TV or follow the news in anyway.