Re: Yes.
>don't these people have *people* to tell them not to do that sort of thing?
They have people to tell them to do precisely this sort of thing.
Had anyone heard of Luton Travellodge, or whatever her name is, before the home video leak ?
26130 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Dec 2009
You realise that by posting the location of GCHQ you 'may' have just become a terrorist.
Section 58 Terrorism Act 2000 <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2000/11/section/58>:
(1) A person commits an offence if—
(a) he collects or makes a record of information of a kind likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism, or
"Economic fact: There can be no cheap housing because landlords won't build housing to rent for lower profits"
If only there was some public organisation devoted to the common public good rather than profit. They could build housing and rent it for affordable rates, enough to cover further building. It would also be helpful if the same organisations were in charge of public transport and were able to decide which public land to use.
Next week Tim demonstrates the impossibility of having an army, since no customer would pay for a tank that might not be used to defend them.
Allow essentially unrestricted building in the south east
Builders want to maximise profit - they still need you to pay as much as possible for a house. So instead of building high density low price housing on vacant lots they build estates of million quid McMansions on 1/2 acre lots (just like every US city from Houston to LA)
You now have a suburb that stretches from London to Dover.
The density is too low for public transport to work so everyone has to drive into London
So you need to build 8 lane motorways into London (just like every US city from Houston to LA)
So you need to knock down a lot of cheap high density housing on the routes into the city.
Housing problem cured, transport problem is a matter or the government, can't expect developers to be restricted by red tape and costs of public transport, just privatise the roads - then economics will cure it.
"If I want to do or say something which I am only prepared to do or say privately, then it is an interference with my freedom of expression if I cannot do it or say it because it will be reported in a newspaper,"
I thought that was what 'D' notices are for? If a judge/politician/policeman says something that would be embarrassing and a newspaper finds out - just claim it's a matter of national security and ban the reporting.
Of course if you are merely rich, you need to just get a super injunction to ban talking about it.
What the UK doesn't have is any workable freedom of information laws.
The point of the article isn't that manufacturers enable extra features for extra money - that's reasonable.
But if somebody enables that extra feature without paying that is a contractual matter between the maker and the purchaser. Using a draconian copyright order to prevent a news site talking about it is unreasonable and is the point of the article. It is also becoming more common.
Whats next?
Report that a certain car bursts into flames when rear-ended? Can't do that anymore , any mention of the car comes under the DMCA.
A ban on explaining that they don't need to buy the expensive duplex version of a printer because they can turn the paper upside down and print side 2 ?
The required party line is hardly a neutral no-comment:
" Nonetheless, it’s worth restating that the Code Club board believe X are a tremendous partner. As a member of the board I am completely aligned with that view'.""
And this is a public volunteer effort aimed at kids. Imagine it was an oil company funding the National Trust, you wouldn't expect to be able to get away with saying that about fracking in a national park.
If it did truly defeat anti-missile defences the only logical option would be to launch all your own missiles the day before it became operational.
That's why star wars was so destabilising - if it really made your own deterrent non-deterring then it automatically starts a war.
Not just the MET, 10 years after the end of the miners strike South Yorkshire police were having to ship suspects to Nottingham for identity parades because the level of hatred for the police meant they couldn't get any volunteers for a line-up.
Although at one point they did famously get creative and blacked up a bunch of officers in a line-up where the suspect was black !
The police banned an Iraqi born doctor from taking AS level chemistry to re-qualify in Britain because of concerns the information might be useful to terrorists.
Presumably German BMW engineers visiting the new Mini plant aren't allowed to see any details of the car in case they learn how to build tanks.
But at US shows the booth babes are dressed in exactly the same way as the staff (Las Vegas gets very prudish about exposed flesh).
So unless you make the assumption that none of the smiling attractive women (or hair producted men_) could possibly be engineers - your only guide is that the smiling ones are models and the ones sulking at the back of the stand chatting to their colleagues work there.
At most US shows the booth babes are actually more use.
They are usually hard working actors/models/waitresses who will explain that they don't work there and will try and find somebody who does. The actual employees, even if sober and not hungover, have been sent to a show in Vegas/SF as a reward for selling the most units that month in Podunk.
Even if they could give a damn about your question they are slightly less qualified to answer it than the half naked women body-painted with the corporate logo.
>WYSIWYG
If you are an author you don't need to care about layout - that's what you have publishers, editors and cover designers for.
It's like saying a composer should use a mixing desk because they need to know what level of compression will be used when they music is played on Radio3.
>whether IBM should try to play seriously in the low end PC market in order to drive volumes (the PS2 does not count as a serious low cost strategy);
>how it can address the move to the PC in a way that generates new revenues and profits and maintains a distinctive user experience;
>and how far new growth will come from PCs and how far from new product categories.
Greed is the only bit of macro-economics that works - the problem is that the rest of it is politics.
Economists make announcements based on ideology - that's why economics is not a science.
Werner von Bran (not a lefty) and Sergei Korolev (hero of the soviet union) make a rocket engine in the same way, but ask an economist if 2% inflation is bad and it depends on which political religion they are.
>Since when has George Soros been associated with espionage activities?
Bill Gates is now a good guy, Maxwell is dead and nobody can take the idea of Beardie Branson as a Bond villain seriously so he's all that's left