Re: Great article but ...
Of course - why else are the eggs in the dairy section ?
26111 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Dec 2009
Looked at moving to NZ about 10years ago. They were running a big Move to NZ drive but it was totally aimed at getting Kiwis to go home - it was full of the "cultural fit" type euphemisms that seemed like the Keep Australia White campaigns in the 50s
The real problem with NZ is that it's such a small population that it's hard for a couple to get a job in the same city. Not much point emigrating if you get a programming job in Wellington and your wife is offered a teaching job in Auckland.
Ended up in Vancouver which is basically New Zealand friendliness+scenery with cultural diversity and the US near enough to go shopping.
Insurance is often the correct response for unlikely and unpredictable events.
You could spend X millions on securing your systems and still be hit OR your could find an insurer that will pay the Y million you lose if a one in Z million event happens and charge you a little more than Y/Z for taking the bet.
What would you suggest? The company fires everybody not directly involved in security - since any spending on anything other than security is obviously not "doing all they can"
>By your reasoning murder, rape and child molestation would be legal, because some people commit those acts despite their being laws against them.
No it's like making a new law specifically banning sending a kidnap ransom demand by email and requiring a box to be ticked on every email stating that this isn't a ransom demand.
Because the NSA's other major role is to advise its client - the US government and its armed forces.
Telling the chiefs of staff that the codes they use to protect their troops are faulty, you knew they were faulty or deliberately made them faulty in order to spy on facebook - is likely to get a response a little stronger than 'regrettable'
So nobody else sees any irony in the same government prosecuting a UKIP voter for saying "kill all X" and then dropping some munitions on a wedding party in county X in order to secure votes from UKIP in an upcoming election?
In one case somebody is offended that a racist is racist, in the other some kids get a cluster bomb up them. One is bad, the other isn't.
>In what possible way could sharing the data on aircraft passengers have helped thwart the Charlie Hebdo killings?
Because it would have set a precendent for checks on road and rail links and requiring internal passports to travel to different regions. Then Paris could be kept for nice white French people and the Pieds Noir kept to the south - although without the confederate flags.
Wasn't there a famous response by a C19 politician to a Prussian request that Marx and his supporters be arrested for calling for the end of monarchy - "In Britain there is no offense in calling for the death of kings so long as no actual act is planned"
It should be perfectly reasonable to stand up on a street corner and say you want to kill XYZ as long as you aren't actually planning an attack.
Otherwise we have the ridiculous case in UK law where it is legal to defame a religous group but not an ethnic one, and we have a series of legal precedents which declare Jews and Sikhs to be a racial groups and therefore protected but muslims and hindus to be religous groups and therefore not subject to race relations laws.
Or the even more ridiculousness US laws which make some groups a protected minority and others not. So it is an offense to attack gays (protected) but not transgender (not covered in the act)
Saying we should bomb $MiddleEasternCountry in retaliation and somebody feels like killing $EthnicGroup would seem rather similar.
But apparently one is national policy and the other is a hate crime - although only if it is an Ethnic group and not a purely religious one.
The people I really feel sorry for are France's far right parties.
"We deplore the attacks on the Jewish supermarket. It's a flagrant case of copyright violation"
And back in 1991 I used to email /etc/hosts files to other universities - we had no DNS
But the point is that google could run a whole separate internet without needing a .google simply by relying on all chrome and android users by default and anyone else putting the name into the search bar.
Wouldn't the solution be slower more expensive connections?
If they only had 56K dialup then the NSA would have had to time to get an warrant and walk over to Sony before the hackers had finished downloading the data.
The solution, create a General Post Office and give it a monopoly on telecomunications
The real genius is how office365, office, sharepoint, Onedrive and even lync refuse to play nicely.
Click on a document in Sharepoint, opens in office365, click on edit, opens it then says, "this needs to checkout", click checkout, says this can only be done in word, click to download, get a warning that this might damage your computer, click ok, Click to edit again,
Work on doocument
save, don't even think about saving the document to onedrive
Exit,
It might checkin depending on the phase of the moon and the I-ching.
Check status in sharepoint, it may or may not show it as checked out to you.
Try and send document by lync to somebody else because they can't get the sharepoint "allegedly locked" version.
In the end we have created a wonderful collaboration tool of all sitting in a group around a single laptop reading the document together. We are thinking calling it "reading circle" or "watch with mother"
Their surveillance is targeted.
Any students that are a bit lefty - especially those that end up being labour cabinet ministers
Any bishops that suggests Thatcherism isn't completely what Jesus would have done.
Any journalist that writes about anything in government
Anyone who complains about any local or national government activity.
All perfectly targetted at potential threats to MI5