Re: Impressive
So, Software As A Service As A Service Server
26130 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Dec 2009
Because there is an agreement between the grown-ups that we're not putting weapons in space. Because otherwise everyone else will and eventually somebody will misinterpret an accidental collision or rocket explosion and decide to take out all your satellites in response, or just put a satellite with 2tons of ball-bearings and a bit of gunpowder and say "well if I can't go up there - nobody can"
It's amazing after all these years they aren't helping themselves.
Had to start up an old Win10 machine "for reasons". It starts doing a series of updates and one bit of the update needs to reboot while another update is still downloading. The restart message pops up a box saying something like:
"systemcore master-control-program prohibited by special services secret-double-probation mode in tron.dll". Ignore Y/N?
But it's now like Keynes's description of the stock market. You aren't guessing which is a bus, you are guessing which picture a million other people, who have never seen a US school bus, think is a bus.
Of courses now that the AI are trained on the same images you have to detect which ones nobody else thought was a bus.
> explain to me in simple terms why this deal benefits Intel
The new major shareholder has an infinite budget and makes up the law.
Every Federal/DoD computer user now has to buy Intel, anybody receiving Federal grants has to buy Intel, any foreign government who doesn't want tariffs/a visit from the 101st airborne, better buy Intel
>, it probably won't be a problem like the Y2K bug
Except the Y2K bug was only a problem for financial systems etc which dealt with a date and year.
Whatever the panic consultants said - no aircraft avionics software was calculating engine settings using a 2digit year
But how may SCADA systems are assuming that time_t always increases, and will do bad things if = measurement/(time_t - prev_time) returns negative, or NaN ?
There is obviously a production Matrix out there where they took all the results from the failed tests and fixed them. Unfortunately we are living in the sandbox Matrix that some junior dev is playing with
It's just another cost of doing business, so ultimately comes off their corporate tax bill and is paid to the "special tax fund", where the executive branch can spend it on gold toilets
An economically literate cynic might think it was effectively just a payment from the American taxpayer to the king.
Surely if all boys are put into proper all-boys schools at the age of 5 where they can be subject to healthy outdoor sports and cold showers we can keep the horrors of boobies away from their poor fragile minds ?
ps. I'm not about to google it from work - but isn't the age-of-consent/marriage age int he UK still 16 ? Seems a bit odd that you have to keep your eyes closed on your wedding night
>If we could market hubris
We would need a dept of Hubris, a cabinet level appointment and a separate hubris csar.
Together they would collaborate to produce a hubris plan as part of the hubris strategy toward a hubris future
Of course design and manufacturing of actual hubris would have to be outsourced to someone with real expertise