Re: Snowden?
They don't abuse their own laws. They do exactly what the laws were designed to do - keep journalists afraid and compliant.
26130 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Dec 2009
I think it's disgusting that the state security apparatus has to go through all this pointless bureaucracy to access data from the state broadcaster.
To improve efficiency we need all depts of government to work together so all information from the state health service, state broadcaster is immediately available to the police and cabinet office.
The same bill that required you to hand over your password also applied to steganography. The wording was something like "any document that contained a hidden or secret message" so if you had a copy of anything by James Joyce or pretty much any religous book in the house you were in trouble.
It's a bit tough to get 5years if you can't explain Paradise Lost
"The penalty for non-disclosure might be significantly less onerous than that for any crime revealed to have been committed if the key is disclosed. "
Not that now the penalties for displeasing her majesty's intelligence services include being extraordinarily renditioned to some -istan to be tortured and then chained to a floor to freeze to death.
It's not a question of experts predict - it's that this money comes out of physics budget and goes to which ever bandwagon is flavour of the month.
So it's nano-tech this, quantum that, cyber-thingy - most of it goes on new buildings and marketing but the studentships, post-docs and staff positions are all cut.
Because government are so much better at spotting the area of physics where the next breakthrough will come than physicists are and can so much more efficiently target resources.
That' why we have all these high temperature superconductor research centers founded, and funded, in the 80s which have produced so much
That people aren't reading or editing certain pages because of a fear that the visit will be monitored and you will go on some government list ?
If the secret police were photographing everyone entering a store and making a list of what they bought - would the store have to prove that some people had stayed away ?
Safe harbour is only about commercial protection of data. If it was about protecting your data from the US government then the Eu wouldn't allow data to be processed in the UK where it will be handed over to our 5eyes partners.
It is about not having your medical records sold to an insurance company, or your banking information sold to advertisers.
The restriction is probably that the banned animals all eat grain. So the rich could have luxury meat by feeding them stuff that people can eat - which would drive up the price of food.
Obviously Jehovah is a commie and that explains the Daily Mail's dislike of his chosen people.
>In that case, how does economics suggest we proceed in order to maximise the amount of science done by the human race in toto?
Traditionally having a decent world war
>Has anyone tried it? If so, what were the results, compared with other alternative approaches?
Last time, we got computers, radar, jet engines, nuclear power, rockets, sonar, proper weather forecasting, ocean floor mapping, discover of the jet stream.
Although there were a certain level of inconvenience for many people and quite a lot of mess.
No - lack of training stuff that up.
A kid in Somalia can read Einstein's papers online. So there is no need for Somalia to invest in higher education, they obviously have all the info they need to build a nuclear power station.
So Britain can wait for Japanese/Korean/Chinese researches to make a discovery and publish the theory and then British industry can go and hire some school leavers and immediately begin manufacturing room temperature super-conductors? All we need is a single national subscription to Phys Rev Letters ?
The point of public science is to train scientists. So they go and work in industry and make things.
After a wasted PhD in nuclear physics (thanks to the cowardly USSR throwing the towel in) I now work on making a new kind of 3d surgery robot. It's not that I found a paper saying how to build this - but that I had years of training in research and solving problems.
The BoM for a collider or a space telescope isn't an investment in science - it's a WTO avoiding subsidy to your country's aerospace industry. That's why most of the staff at CERN or ESA are devoted to making sure that Belgian companies get 2.73% of the contracts to match their contribution.
Diverting that money from student place, staff posts, and university depts is what does the damage.
>Generously rewarding PV ... must go down as one of the most stupid ideas ever conceived by a British government
Not if you think of it as MIRAS with a new greener coating.
Giving homeowners money for nothing, paid for by charging OAPs and poor renters more for leccy is frankly brilliant.
Pay $100/year to the BBC to be able to watch TV from over here - not allowed
$few/episode to the BBC to watch Sherlock/Qi/Dr Who - not allowed
Pay $50/month for BBC America on top of $100/month premium cable, to watch episodes a month later with commercials - allowed
Or Torrent for free ?
Worker cost isn't the main reason to build iPhones in China - it is that the chip fab is next door to the screen maker who is next door to the glass maker who is next door to the machine shop....
You could build a cost effective automated assembly line for iPhones in america. And if you built it in the right southern state you could be paid for building it. The trouble is that all the components would come from china and take 6weeks - so your stocking, logistics and ability to ramp up/down production are horrible
> if Korea can build these, so can everyone else
I think you missed the bit where it says "government will invest in Research"
We can certainly throw $15M at a silicon roundabout PR initiative to develop a digital concept around how people would relate to a robot in a multcultural mobile scenario - but building robots ?
That's the enlightenment. The idea that you try things, see which work and then come up with a reason - rather than pray/do something pointless but must be right because you have always done it that way and the guild says to do it.
It's just that it took about 300 years longer for the idea of evidence to catch on in medicine than it did in physics. There are even signs it may soon be discovered b economics.
>include clauses where you the customer effectively wave your data protection rights
It doesn't matter what they put in their terms and conditions - the law wins.
I can put in the small print that you waive the requirement that my medical product is approved by the FDA, and that you allow me to resolve all claims in Liberia. But the FDA are still going to come and see me - and the still carry guns.
Except that the German security authorities (along with the UK, French et al) have just announced that they will slurp all your data "for security reasons".
So a US corporation could argue that this is nothing to do with privacy and is purely an anti-competitive move and is no different from the FAA forcing all US airlines to only use US built planes and engines "for security reasons"
No it's because the deal is for an end-end trip with the driver knowing in advance and agreeing to the deal and fare before picking you up. A black cab has to pick you up, has to take you to where you want, and can have have you decide to just get out at the first red light and just pay for 1/4mi.
It's like the difference between a fixed price contract to install off the shelf software and an hourly rate to write a custom system where you can quit at any point. I don't know about you but I would charge a very different rate for those.
The taxi is required to take you anywhere - the minicab isn't.
The taxi drivers would argue that they need a monopoly to make up for the loses by having to take less profitable fares rather than picking and choosing only profitable trips to the airport.
Obviously the solution today is simply market pricing - the rate/mile to go across south of the river after 10:00 could be more than a trip to Heathrow.