Re: Asperger's has been very good to me
>So what you're suggesting is being NT is a disability?
In my line of work, being the one in the office without a maths PhD means you are handicapped - yes !
26111 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Dec 2009
The UK government famously prosecuted the communist party for destroying a bug.
While denying that MI5 had planted the bug or even that MI5 existed.
The prosecution's argument was that the spied upon believed that it was the government was doing the spying and so intended to destroy government property !
It's worse over here in Murika. We have the "this facility contains a substance known to the state of Ca to cause cancer" warnings on our office door. Because it applies to so many things (printer toner, floor cleaner, nail varnish remover) that it's impossible not to have it.
But our anodizing plant - full of really nasty chemicals - has the same warning message.
The city of London is the best place in the world to commit a crime - that's why so many institutions have their HQ there.
Compared to the finacial regulators in New York, Frankfurt or Singapore you can be pretty sure that the City of London police will take very little interest in your activities
That's the beauty of copyright.
You have the copyright on every single line of code you write - even after it goes into the kernel.
So if you misuse it by breaking the GPL, every single author of every single line of code can sue you. In this case vmware are specifically using (allegedly) a module written by this guy
Because it's more effective to shut down an airport/train station/shopping center with a call rather than an actual bomb.
An actual bomb risks you getting caught or accidentally blowing up a photogenic disabled child which would look bad on the news. The official terrorists have code words registered with the police so that both sides know it's a real call.
1) Airpower can suppress opposition but
The opposition comes from your own voters.
Stealth aircraft look cool and you don't get many dead pilots if you stay high enough.
2) ground forces are needed to drive them out and
Why would you want to drvie them out, good enemies are hard to find these days.
3) political will is needed to keep them out.
Commies are funny now and since we have fracking we don't even want to keep them out of countries that have oil
4) You can't indefinitely occupy a country whose inhabitants don't _want_ to be occupied and (Soviets in Afghanistan?)
That's why the Brits always split the country and let them fight each other - works for centuries.
5) you don't win hearts and minds by dropping bombs on some bystander's family
Only hearts and minds of congress matter. As long as you build the bomber in their constituency they will support you.
6) (on the other hand, doing so is one of the best recruiting tools for terrorists that exists) case in point: ISIS
ISIS mostly kill other people that we would be killing. We will get round to re-doing the terrorist league tables next year.
I think it's disgusting that the state security apparatus has to go through all this pointless bureaucracy to access data from the state broadcaster.
To improve efficiency we need all depts of government to work together so all information from the state health service, state broadcaster is immediately available to the police and cabinet office.
The same bill that required you to hand over your password also applied to steganography. The wording was something like "any document that contained a hidden or secret message" so if you had a copy of anything by James Joyce or pretty much any religous book in the house you were in trouble.
It's a bit tough to get 5years if you can't explain Paradise Lost
"The penalty for non-disclosure might be significantly less onerous than that for any crime revealed to have been committed if the key is disclosed. "
Not that now the penalties for displeasing her majesty's intelligence services include being extraordinarily renditioned to some -istan to be tortured and then chained to a floor to freeze to death.
It's not a question of experts predict - it's that this money comes out of physics budget and goes to which ever bandwagon is flavour of the month.
So it's nano-tech this, quantum that, cyber-thingy - most of it goes on new buildings and marketing but the studentships, post-docs and staff positions are all cut.
Because government are so much better at spotting the area of physics where the next breakthrough will come than physicists are and can so much more efficiently target resources.
That' why we have all these high temperature superconductor research centers founded, and funded, in the 80s which have produced so much
That people aren't reading or editing certain pages because of a fear that the visit will be monitored and you will go on some government list ?
If the secret police were photographing everyone entering a store and making a list of what they bought - would the store have to prove that some people had stayed away ?
Safe harbour is only about commercial protection of data. If it was about protecting your data from the US government then the Eu wouldn't allow data to be processed in the UK where it will be handed over to our 5eyes partners.
It is about not having your medical records sold to an insurance company, or your banking information sold to advertisers.